{"id":271355,"date":"2022-08-08T10:00:11","date_gmt":"2022-08-08T04:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=271355"},"modified":"2022-08-12T10:08:57","modified_gmt":"2022-08-12T04:38:57","slug":"offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/","title":{"rendered":"“Offence occurred at the spur of the moment”; Tripura High Court modifies sentence"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Tripura High Court<\/span>: The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill or cause any grievous injury to the victim. The appeal was filed against the judgment and order of conviction for the offence punishable under Sections 447<\/a>, 326<\/a>, 307<\/a> Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for 10 years with default stipulation.<\/p>\n

Prosecution’s case being that on 11-09-2014 the appellant entered into the house of the complainant and started shouting and abusing him, and at that time nephew of the complainant arrived there and asked the reason of his shouting and then the accused got furious and attacked him taking out a dagger due to which he sustained grievous bleeding injury on his abdomen and the accused was so furious that after striking once he was in desperate mode to strike repeatedly as to kill the victim.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the appellant submitted that the prosecution had miserably failed to establish the charges leveled against the convict-appellant. He submitted that there was a scuffling between the accused-appellant and the victim and in course of such scuffling, the accused-appellant had also sustained severe injuries on his person caused by the victim and his relatives. It was further argued that if there was any assault or attack, as alleged, the same occurred at the heat of the moment and there was no intention on the part of the accused-appellant to cause any such injury to the victim.<\/p>\n

PP supported the findings of the trial court while convicting the accused.<\/p>\n

The Court revisited the evidences let in by the prosecution witnesses(PW) and defence witnesses(DW) in order to appreciate the submissions by the counsels and opined that it transpires clearly that initially there was an altercation between the accused-appellant and the victim which ultimately turned down into scuffling between them and it is further evident from the cross-examination of PW-6 and PW-8 that there existed some land dispute between the accused-appellant and the victim prior to the incident. Thus, it can be presumed that since there exist some dispute between the accused and the family of the victim, an altercation took place between the accused and the victim in regard to the land dispute and the accused-appellant on the heat of anger had committed such offence punishable under penal code, which act of the appellant was not at all intentional or that the appellant had no motive to kill or cause any grievous injury to the victim.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court held that the trial court had fairly convicted the appellant based on material evidence produced by the prosecution and there was no infirmity in the impugned findings regarding conviction however, the Court was of the opinion that considering the facts in its entirety, it seems that the offence occurred at the spur of the moment; the appellant had no intention or motive to kill the victim; the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent in his past life; he is not required in any other criminal case except the one in question.<\/p>\n

The Court thus, partly allowing the appeal modified the sentence of the appellant from 10 years to that of 7 years.<\/p>\n

[Chandan Adhikari v. State of Tripura, 2022 SCC OnLine Tri 492<\/a>, decided on 06-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr A. Das, Advocate, for the Appellant(s);<\/p>\n

Mr Ratan Datta, PP, Mr S. Debnath, Addl. PP, Advocates, for the Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

\n

*Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2521,34481,5861,24914,50752],"class_list":["post-271355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Evidence","tag-land-dispute","tag-modification","tag-motive","tag-spur-of-the-moment"],"yoast_head":"\n"Offence occurred at the spur of the moment"; Tripura High Court modifies sentence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""Offence occurred at the spur of the moment"; Tripura High Court modifies sentence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-08T04:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-12T04:38:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/\",\"name\":\"\\\"Offence occurred at the spur of the moment\\\"; Tripura High Court modifies sentence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-08T04:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-12T04:38:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"“Offence occurred at the spur of the moment”; Tripura High Court modifies sentence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"Offence occurred at the spur of the moment\"; Tripura High Court modifies sentence | SCC Times","description":"The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Offence occurred at the spur of the moment\"; Tripura High Court modifies sentence","og_description":"The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-08T04:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-12T04:38:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/","name":"\"Offence occurred at the spur of the moment\"; Tripura High Court modifies sentence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-08-08T04:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-12T04:38:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Division Bench of T. Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. partly allowed an appeal holding that there was no motive to kill","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/offence-occurred-at-the-spur-of-the-moment-tripura-high-court-modifies-sentence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"“Offence occurred at the spur of the moment”; Tripura High Court modifies sentence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/17\/not-planned-but-committed-in-sudden-spur-of-the-moment-bombay-high-court-reduces-father-brothers-li-to-10-years-ri-for-killing-girls-lover\/","url_meta":{"origin":271355,"position":0},"title":"‘Not planned but committed in sudden spur of the moment’; Bombay High Court reduces father-brother’s LI to 10 years RI for killing girl’s lover","author":"Editor","date":"October 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court : In an appeal filed questioning the legality of Judgment and convicting both Appellants i.e. a father and a son, under Section 235(2) of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentencing both\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205896,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-on-finding-incident-to-be-not-at-spur-of-moment\/","url_meta":{"origin":271355,"position":1},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld on finding incident to be not at spur of moment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and M.R. Shah, JJ. dismissed an appeal arising out of Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, while altering the conviction and sentence awarded under Sections 304 Part II IPC to that of under Section 302 IPC. The factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/02\/tripura-high-court-mere-presence-of-the-accused-person-and-last-seen-of-the-offence-cannot-draw-an-inference-to-committing-of-the-crime-conviction-reversed\/","url_meta":{"origin":271355,"position":2},"title":"Tripura High Court | Mere presence of the accused person and last seen of the offence cannot draw an inference to committing of the crime ; Conviction reversed","author":"Editor","date":"August 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of Amarnath Goud and Arindam Lodh, JJ. allowed an appeal which was filed against the judgment of Sessions Judge convicting the appellant under Section 302 of the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Marriage ceremony was solemnized in between the deceased Sima and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202097,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/21\/slightest-penetration-of-whatever-degree-is-sine-qua-non-to-attract-provision-of-section-376-ipc-absence-thereof-regarded-as-fondling-tripura-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":271355,"position":3},"title":"Slightest penetration, of whatever degree, is sine qua non to attract provision of Section 376 IPC; absence thereof regarded as \u2018fondling\u2019: Tripura High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arindam lodh, J. disposed of an appeal wherein the offence under Section 376 IPC was converted to Section 354 IPC. The Appeal was filed by the appellant against the order of District Court whereby he was alleged for the offence of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/09\/tripura-hc-obligatory-for-prosecution-to-prove-valid-sanction-for-filing-complaint-under-section-500-ipc-against-sitting-mla\/","url_meta":{"origin":271355,"position":4},"title":"Tripura HC | Obligatory for prosecution to prove valid sanction for filing complaint under Section 500 IPC against sitting MLA","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"\"In this case, though in the sanction order it has been recorded 'by order' but from that word\u00a0it cannot be inferred by whose order.\" Tripura High Court:\u00a0The Bench of S. Talapatra, J. set aside the conviction of the appellant (who was a Member of Tripura legislative Assembly at the relevant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/law-has-more-focus-on-reformatory-side-tripura-hc-commutes-death-sentence-into-life-imprisonment-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":271355,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Law has more focus on reformatory side\u2019; Tripura HC commutes death sentence to life imprisonment of a man convicted for murdering five people","author":"Editor","date":"February 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe sword of justice given to a Judge has to be exercise with utmost responsibility and judiciously considering the reforms.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}