{"id":271316,"date":"2022-08-06T11:00:14","date_gmt":"2022-08-06T05:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=271316"},"modified":"2025-05-19T14:31:40","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T09:01:40","slug":"if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/","title":{"rendered":"“If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected”, says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi<\/span>: The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal, imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the appellant for not disclosing his status, to avoid court fees and appearing before the Bench through a third party, who pretended to be an advocate.<\/p>\n

Factual Background<\/p>\n

The Appellant had filed Information Application under Section 19 (1) (a)<\/a> of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a> before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against 37 different government agencies. The Appellant alleged in the Information Application that Respondent, National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) had formed various exclusive supply agreements in violation of Section 3(4)(b)<\/a> of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a> with the remaining 36 respondents where no other accreditation service other than that of NABL was allowed.<\/p>\n

On 24-02-2022, the CCI passed an order under Section 26(2)<\/a> of the Competition Act, 2002<\/a>, and was of the view that there was no contravention of the provisions of Section 3<\/a> and 4<\/a> of the Competition Act<\/a>. Aggrieved with the order passed, the Appellant filed the Company Appeal under Section 53B against the order given by the CCI. The Company Appeal was taken up for hearing on 01-06-2022.<\/p>\n

Observation, Analysis, and Decision<\/p>\n

While hearing the Appeal, the Bench suspected the status of the Appellant and thereof directed his counsel to submit a detailed affidavit verifying the status of his client. After the Affidavit was submitted, the Bench observed that the appellant evaded the applicable court by not mentioning before either the CCI or the Bench that he was a proprietor of an accreditation agency.<\/p>\n

Further, the Bench observed that not only the Appellant as well as his acting Counsel, Sumit Jain, misled the court as he was neither a lawyer nor a Chartered Accountant, Company Secretary, or Cost Accountant.<\/p>\n

At this juncture, the Bench referred to the provisions under Section 35<\/a> and Section 53(s)<\/a> of the Competition Act<\/a> and was of the view that a party cannot be represented by any third person who is not included in either of the aforesaid statutory provisions. Therefore, the Bench held that Mr. Sumit Jain had not only unauthorisedly represented the Appellant but impersonated himself to be counsel for the Appellant.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Bench opined that neither the Appellant was competent, nor the Company Appeal was competent to be taken note of.<\/p>\n

Thereby, the Bench dismissed the Company Appeal on the grounds of non-maintainability and said, “To preserve sanctity of the court proceeding and confidence of the public in the system, simply dismissal of this Appeal may not serve the purpose. Further to prevent recurrence of such activity, while dismissing the appeal it is appropriate to impose cost on the appellant<\/span>.” <\/span>Hence, imposed a cost of Rs.1 lakh on the appellant.<\/p>\n

Further, the Bench directed CCI to remain vigilant while entertaining Information applications.<\/p>\n

[Dushyant v. CCI, 2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 337<\/a>, decided on 29-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Sumit Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant;<\/p>\n

Shama Nargis, Dy. Director, Law, CCI, and Krishan Kumar, Nital Pal, Swikritmala Dubey, Arun Kumar, and Prema Priyadarshini, Advocates, for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":262229,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[39658,34595,31537,43683,22014],"class_list":["post-271316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-anti-competitive-agreements","tag-company-law","tag-competition-act-2002","tag-equity","tag-nclat"],"yoast_head":"\n"If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected", says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected", says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-06T05:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-19T09:01:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/\",\"name\":\"\\\"If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected\\\", says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-06T05:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-19T09:01:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"“If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected”, says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected\", says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate | SCC Times","description":"The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected\", says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate","og_description":"The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-06T05:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-19T09:01:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/","name":"\"If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected\", says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","datePublished":"2022-08-06T05:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-19T09:01:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Bench of Rakesh Kumar, J., Judicial Member, and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member, while dismissing a company appeal","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/06\/if-one-does-not-come-before-the-court-or-tribunal-with-clean-hands-his-claim-deserves-to-be-rejected-says-nclat-imposes-a-cost-of-rs-1-lakh-on-the-appellant-for-appearing-through-counsel-personi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"“If one does not come before the Court or Tribunal with clean hands his claim deserves to be rejected”, says NCLAT; imposes a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the Appellant for appearing through counsel personifying to be an advocate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/31\/nclat-modified-imposed-cost-on-being-highly-excessive-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":271316,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT modifies Rs Ten Lakh cost for being highly excessive","author":"Ritu","date":"May 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While speedily and effectively disposing off the present appeal, the NCLAT modified the imposed cost from Rs. 10,00,000\/- to Rs. 1,00,000\/- for the restoration of the company's name in the register maintained by the ROC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":174704,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/11\/nclat-rejects-appeal-due-lack-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":271316,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT rejects appeal due to lack of evidence","author":"Saba","date":"December 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: In the judgment delivered by S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson), AIS Cheema (Judicial Member) and Balvinder Singh (Technical Member) dismissing the appeal against the impugned order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) dated 8-2-2017. Mr. Subodh Kumar Sharma, the appellant had filed a complaint against Gateway\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/21\/nclat-company-and-its-directors-to-be-treated-equally-while-imposing-fine-for-delay-in-filing-cost-audit-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":271316,"position":2},"title":"NCLAT | Company and its directors to be treated equally while imposing fine for delay in filing Cost Audit Report","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial) held that the company and the directors have to be treated equally while imposing fine for delay in filing Cost Audit Report. The appeal was filed against the order of National Company Law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/14\/major-setback-to-amazon-as-nclat-upholds-ccis-decision-to-impose-rs-200-crore-penalty-vis-a-vis-the-amazon-future-deal\/","url_meta":{"origin":271316,"position":3},"title":"Major setback to Amazon as NCLAT upholds CCI\u2019s decision to impose Rs. 200 crore penalty vis-a-vis the Amazon-Future Deal","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): While deciding the instant appeal filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC challenging the order passed by the Competition Commission of India dated 17-12-2021 [Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings, In re, 2021 SCC OnLine CCI 71], wherein the CCI had imposed a penalty of INR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/12\/tyre-cartelization-matter-nclat-remanded-matter-back-to-cci-asks-to-review-fines-to-save-domestic-tyre-industry\/","url_meta":{"origin":271316,"position":4},"title":"Tyre Cartelization Matter | NCLAT remanded matter back to CCI; asks to review fines to save domestic tyre industry","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | In a landmark judgment related to cartelization activities of five major domestic tyre manufactures and their association namely Apollo, MRF, Ceat, JK Tyre, Birla Tyres, dating back around 10 years ago, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar, J. (Judicial Member) and Dr.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":271825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/18\/reduction-of-share-capital-is-a-matter-of-domestic-concern-nclat-confirms-reduction-of-the-share-capital-approved-by-the-shareholders-of-precious-energy-services-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":271316,"position":5},"title":"“Reduction of Share Capital is a matter of domestic concern”; NCLAT confirms reduction of the share capital approved by the shareholders of Precious Energy Services Ltd.","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): While deciding the instant appeal filed by Precious Energy Services Ltd., against the order of NCLT holding the reduction of share capital to be against the interests of the company; the Bench of Justice Anant Bijay Singh (Judicial Member) and Shreesha Merla\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271316"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271316\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/262229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}