{"id":271172,"date":"2022-08-04T17:00:08","date_gmt":"2022-08-04T11:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=271172"},"modified":"2025-05-19T14:18:28","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T08:48:28","slug":"uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

   <\/p>\n

Uttaranchal High Court<\/span>: The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post does not indicate the promotion rules, does not mean that there are no Rules framed or applicable for promotion, requiring minimum service in the feeder cadre.<\/p>\n

Facts:<\/p>\n

The appeal was preferred by the appellants after obtaining leave, since they were not parties to the writ proceedings, wherein the impugned order was passed by the Single Judge on 11-08-2017. The writ petitioners are respondents in this instant appeal preferring a writ petition assailing the order dated 09-09-2016 passed by the respondent authority, whereby the respondents were promoted to the post of Assistant Accounts Manager in the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation.<\/p>\n

The appellants have assailed the impugned order dated 11-08-2017 on the ground that the Court wrongly proceeded on the premise that, for promotion to the post of Assistant Accounts Manager, the persons working in the feeder post should have substantive service of at least 7 years, as a condition of eligibility. According to the appellants there was no minimum qualifying service required.<\/p>\n

Arguments:<\/p>\n

The counsel for appellant contended that prior to bifurcation of the State of Uttarakhand from the State of Uttar Pradesh, in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Development Corporation, from which the respondent corporation has been carved out, the service conditions were governed by Regulations framed in the year 1985. In the said Corporation's promotion Rules, the minimum required service of 7 years was prescribed in the feeder cadre. However, upon the creation of the State of Uttarakhand, the respondent was created in the year 2001. According to the appellants, after 2001, the 1985 Regulations of the Uttar Pradesh Forest Development Corporation were no longer applicable. He further submitted that on 06-06-2007, a completely new cadre of officers was created in the respondent corporation.<\/p>\n

The counsel finally submitted that even the communication did not clearly indicate as to what were the promotion rules. Further, the mandatory requirement of experience must be deemed to have been waived.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the respondent corporation drew attention to Sections 67<\/a> and 74<\/a> of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000<\/a> (‘UP Reorganization'), which led to the formation of the State of Uttarakhand. He submitted that as the corporation has carved out from Uttar Pradesh Forest Development Corporation it continues to operate in the State of Uttarakhand.<\/p>\n

The counsel placed his reliance on Section 74<\/a> of the UP Reorganisation Act<\/a> argued that the conditions service of persons serving in connection with the affairs of the State, could not be alerted to their disadvantage, and they continued to operate as they were operating prior to bifurcation of the State. He submits that no previous approval was obtained by the Central Government to remove the minimum requirement.<\/p>\n

Observation and Analysis:<\/p>\n

The Court found no merit in the argument that there was any requirement of any minimum qualifying years of service.<\/p>\n

Further it was held that merely because the order sanctioning the posts did not indicate the promotion Rules, does not mean that there was no Rule framed or applicable for promotion.<\/p>\n

Hence, the respondent corporation was directed to fill up the vacancies in the cadre and the special Appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n

[Krishna Kunwar Singh Dewari v. Kripal Singh, 2022 SCC OnLine Utt 789<\/a>, decided on 19-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel for Appellants: Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate<\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Abhijay Negi, Advocate<\/p>\n

Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General<\/p>\n

Mr. V.K. Kapruwan, Advocate<\/p>\n\n

https:\/\/hcservices.ecourts.gov.in\/ecourtindiaHC\/cases\/display_pdf.php?filename=rC8SUFuyEFsvB5V61cXUrElu1MmZWPXzCwheqkAW3XaTdJ8LLlyIa%2B%2FGilaNnsw2&caseno=SPA\/682\/2018&cCode=1&appFlag=<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Uttaranchal High Court: The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[50713,3645,50712,47565,5941,8981,50714,29960],"class_list":["post-271172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-minimum-qualifying-years-for-promotion","tag-promotion","tag-promotion-rules","tag-sanction-of-posts","tag-service-law","tag-service-rules","tag-uttar-pradesh-reorganization-act-2000","tag-vacancies"],"yoast_head":"\nUttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-04T11:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-19T08:48:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/\",\"name\":\"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-04T11:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-19T08:48:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules | SCC Times","description":"The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules","og_description":"The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-04T11:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-19T08:48:28+00:00","author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/","name":"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-08-04T11:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-19T08:48:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325107,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/orissa-high-court-validates-promotion-forest-rangers-through-reservation\/","url_meta":{"origin":271172,"position":0},"title":"Orissa HC upholds Forest Rangers\u2019 promotion who were promoted through reservation under OFS Group A (JB), 2013","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDenial of consideration of the cases of the appellants, who had completed five years of continuous service in the rank of OFS Group-A (JB) for their promotion in the rank of OFS Group-A (Senior), would amount to nullifying their promotions to the rank of OFS Group-A (JB) from the post\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314547,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/19\/cal-hc-upholds-promotion-selection-process-emphasises-on-minimum-merit-benchmarks-beyond-written-test-stage-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":271172,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds promotion selection process; emphasises on minimum merit benchmarks beyond written test stage","author":"Ritu","date":"February 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the appellant at best can make an endeavour before the fact-finding forum because in exercise of writ jurisdiction, the High Court found no tenable and cogent ground on which the impugned judgment can be faulted.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/high-court-cannot-treat-itself-a-court-of-appeal-while-entertaining-writ-of-certiorari\/","url_meta":{"origin":271172,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | High Court cannot treat itself a court of appeal while entertaining writ of certiorari","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of S.K, Mishra ACJ. & N.S. Dhanik J., dismissed a petition filed against Claim Petition No. 05\/NB\/DB\/2014. The petitioners prayed for quashing of the judgment and order dated 20-06-2018 passed by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal and to issue a writ in the nature\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/compartmentalization-of-vacancies-based-on-academic-qualification-challenged\/","url_meta":{"origin":271172,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Compartmentalization of vacancies based on academic qualification challenged; Court decides claims","author":"Editor","date":"November 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Manoj Kumar Tiwari and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., decided on a petition which was filed seeking a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other writ declaring the Rule 6 of the Uttarakhand Subordinate offices clerical cadre employees (direct\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343655,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/15\/exemption-from-efficiency-test-for-promotion-is-not-a-matter-of-right-but-a-one-time-exception-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":271172,"position":4},"title":"Exemption from Efficiency Test for promotion is a one-time exception, not a matter of Right: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA government employee cannot claim promotion as a matter of right and he can only be considered for promotion according to the extant Rules.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336435,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/02\/sc-denies-retrospective-promotion-and-notional-benefits-to-superannuated-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":271172,"position":5},"title":"SC denies retrospective promotion and notional benefits to superannuated employee under Rule 54(1)(a) of WB Service Rules","author":"Editor","date":"December 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPromotion only becomes effective upon the assumption of duties on the promotional post and not on the date of occurrence of the vacancy or the date of recommendation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"promotion to superannuated employee","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/promotion-to-superannuated-employee.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/promotion-to-superannuated-employee.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/promotion-to-superannuated-employee.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/promotion-to-superannuated-employee.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}