{"id":271106,"date":"2022-08-03T16:00:14","date_gmt":"2022-08-03T10:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=271106"},"modified":"2022-08-12T17:51:04","modified_gmt":"2022-08-12T12:21:04","slug":"madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/span>: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision under Order XLVII Rule 9<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC), a review of an order passed in a review petition is not maintainable.<\/p>\n

A petition was filed seeking recall of an order passed by the Court in a Miscellaneous Petition. The said petition was dismissed against which a review petition was filed under Order XLVII Rule 1<\/a> CPC<\/a>. The review petition was also dismissed by the Court, against which, the Petitioners filed the instant review petition.<\/p>\n

Senior Counsel appearing for the review petitioners contended that gross error had occasioned and hence, the court has jurisdiction to entertain the same. She relied on few judgments and Section 141<\/a> of CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Deputy Advocate General objected stating that in terms of Order XLVII Rule 9 of CPC a review of a review is not maintainable.<\/p>\n

The Court distinguished the judgments relied on by the petitioner on facts and reiterated Section 141 of CPC holding that if the contention of the petitioner is to be accepted with reference to Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, then all the previous proceedings will be a nullity. The Court further reproduced Order XLVII Rule 9 of the CPC:<\/p>\n

“9. Bar of certain applications.- No application to review an order made on an application for a review or a decree or order passed or made on a review shall be entertained.”<\/b><\/p>\n

The Court dismissing the petition held that clear reading of Order XLVII Rule 9 would bar the second review application.<\/p>\n

[Anand Deep Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2022 SCC OnLine MP 1816<\/a>, decided on 08-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mrs Shobha Menon, Sr Adv and Ms Aanchal Saraf, Advocate, for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n

Mr Amit Seth, Deputy Advocate General, Advocate, for the Respondent 1;<\/p>\n

Mr K.C. Ghildiyal, Sr Adv with Mr Aditya Veer Singh, Advocates, for the Respondent 6 and 16;<\/p>\n

Mr Umesh Tripathi, Advocate, for the Respondent 5.<\/p>\n

\n

*Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268364,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11211,8331,7201,30265,2897,4841],"class_list":["post-271106","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-application","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-petition","tag-Review","tag-review-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nMadhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-08-03T10:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-12T12:21:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-03T10:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-12T12:21:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed | SCC Times","description":"The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed","og_description":"The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-08-03T10:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-12T12:21:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/","name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","datePublished":"2022-08-03T10:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-12T12:21:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. dismissed a second review petition holding that pursuant to the provision","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/03\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-review-of-an-order-passed-in-a-review-petition-under-order-xlvii-rule-9-held-not-maintainable-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Review of an order passed in a review petition under Order XLVII Rule 9 held not maintainable; Petition dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":300768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":271106,"position":0},"title":"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"High Courts are superior Courts of records, and the power to review orders is not restricted by the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/doctrine-of-merger-not-attracted-by-dismissed-slp-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":271106,"position":1},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court with or without reasons, will not attract the Doctrine of Merger: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising the review jurisdiction, it must be borne in mind that review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and must strictly be confined to the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Doctrine of Merger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":271106,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming that the Additional Director General of Police was unlawfully encroaching upon their land.\u00a0 The petitioners had claimed that they had approached the relevant authorities, but no action was taken by them. They subsequently filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/15\/mp-hc-no-reason-to-review-by-court-if-there-is-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-review-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":271106,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | No reason to review by court if there is no error apparent on the face of record; review petition dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of S.C. Sharma and Virender Singh, JJ., dismissed the review petition on the ground that no interference was required when there was no error apparent on the face of the record. A Public Interest Litigation Writ Petition was made by certain persons against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/29\/mp-hc-in-the-garb-of-review-rehearing-cannot-be-permitted-court-dismisses-review-petition-finding-no-error-apparent\/","url_meta":{"origin":271106,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | In the garb of review, rehearing cannot be permitted; Court dismisses review petition finding no error apparent","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a case seeking review of an order of this particular Court by the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J., dismissed the same finding no ground to interfere in the original order. The instant review petition has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/mp-hc-plaint-filed-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-can-be-rejected-based-on-grounds-mentioned-in-rule-11-or-if-the-cause-of-action-has-not-been-disclosed\/","url_meta":{"origin":271106,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Plaint filed under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC can be rejected based on grounds mentioned in Rule 11 or if the cause of action has not been disclosed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Prakash Shrivastava, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 115 CPC where they challenged the order of the Trial Court, whereby their application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The respondents had filed the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271106","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271106"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271106\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271106"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271106"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}