{"id":270893,"date":"2022-07-30T12:00:45","date_gmt":"2022-07-30T06:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=270893"},"modified":"2025-05-17T12:20:23","modified_gmt":"2025-05-17T06:50:23","slug":"allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/","title":{"rendered":"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">&#160; &#160;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court<\/span>: The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order of convicting accused-appellant under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561635\">326<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#39;) and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\">3 (2) (v)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\">Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (&#8216;SC\/ST Act&#39;) observed that to prosecute a person for an offence committed under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC\/ST Act, there must be evidence to show that the accused committed the crime knowing that such person\/victim is a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The FIR came to be lodged against the accused on 29-01-2011 by the father of the injured as the injured was hospitalized.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the appellant had submitted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561635\">326<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> is not made out as injuries are not such which would fall within the purview of Section 326 of IPC. As far as commission of offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\">3 (2) (v)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\">SC\/ST Act<\/a> was concerned, it was submitted that the F.I.R. nowhere states that the injured belonged to a particular community. No documentary evidence to prove the same was there.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court considering this a special case discussed the importance of FIR and its content. The Court noted that this FIR was silent on the aspect that the injured belong to a particular community falling in the term &#8216;Scheduled Castes&#8217; or &#8216;Scheduled Tribes&#8217; so as to attract the provision of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\">3 (2) (v)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\">SC\/ST Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>For attracting the provisions of Section 3 (2) (v) of SC\/ST Act, there should be corroboration by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured, on whom the act is committed, belongs to &#8216;Scheduled Castes&#8217; or &#8216;Scheduled Tribes&#8217;.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span>The Court relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in <i>Ram Das v. State of U.P.,<\/i><\/span> <span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/531vBP57\">(2007) 2 SCC 170<\/a> where there was rape on woman belonging to Scheduled Caste, it was held that these could be no ground to convict the accused under Section 3 (2) (v) when there was no evidence to support the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\">3 (2) (v)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\">SC\/ST Act<\/a>. Mere fact that victim happened to be a girl belonging to Scheduled Caste did not attract provisions of SC\/ST Act. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in the case at hand no independent witness have been examined who would depose that the accused committed the offence on the ground that injured belonged to a community covered under SC\/ST Act. The Court thus believed that this omission proves fatal for the prosecution in such a vital matter where punishment is for life imprisonment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Judge has not even discussed the evidence and only on the basis of caste, he held that the offence was deemed to be committed. There is no deeming provision under SC\/ST Act. <\/span>The Court consequently set aside the Conviction and sentence under Section 3 (2) (v) of the accused-appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Coming to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561635\">326<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> which deals with voluntary causing grievous hurts by dangerous weapons or means the Court noted that the fact that the injured had sustained burn injuries on the face, show that the injures had sustained grievous injuries therefore, ingredients of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561635\">326<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">IPC<\/a> are made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the punishment was too harsh in relation to which the Court analysed the theory of punishment prevalent in India. The Court relying on <i>Mohd. Giasuddin v. State of A.P.,<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/aQTO5369\">(1977) 3 SCC 287<\/a>; <i>Deo Narain Mandal v. State of UP<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Cxr2Dl39\">, (2004) 7 SCC 257<\/a>; <i>Ravada Sasikala v. State of A.P.,<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9pRWxuAj\">(2017) 4 SCC 546<\/a> held that keeping in view <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">criminal jurisprudence in our country which is reformative and corrective and not retributive no accused person is incapable of being reformed and therefore, all measures should be applied to give them an opportunity of reformation in order to bring them in the social stream.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case stated that it is necessary to impose punishment keeping in view the &#8216;doctrine of proportionality&#8217;. The Court believed that punishment of 10 years imprisonment is too harsh and the fine of Rs.25000\/- is also too harsh reducing it to 9 years&#8217; incarceration and fine to Rs.2000\/-, reason being, the complainant and the injured would have been adequately compensated by the Government as they have invoked provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\">3 (2) (v)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\">SC\/ST Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Pintu Gupta v. State of U.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gHfQ4o88\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 SCC OnLine All 497<\/a>, decided on 28-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Rajesh Yadav, Advocates, Counsel for the Appellant;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Nagendra Srivastava, A.G.A. assisted by Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate, Counsel for the State.<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#160; &#160; Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269339,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,50587,34054,30486,5861,50585,50586,29584,29585],"class_list":["post-270893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-corrective-theory","tag-grievous-hurt","tag-injury","tag-modification","tag-reformative-theory","tag-retributive-theory","tag-scheduled-caste","tag-scheduled-tribe"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-30T06:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-17T06:50:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-30T06:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-17T06:50:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified | SCC Times","description":"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified","og_description":"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-07-30T06:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-17T06:50:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/","name":"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-07-30T06:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-17T06:50:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/guj-hc-held-not-every-insult-offence-under-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":270893,"position":0},"title":"Gujarat High Court: Not every insult or intimidation amounts to an offence under SC ST Act","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFrom the allegations made in the complaint, the prosecution has not proved that the accused is guilty of an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"not every insult offence under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":270893,"position":1},"title":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJust because the witnesses\u2019 statements do not disclose any overt act, that by itself would not be a ground to discharge the accused as law does not insist plenty of witnesses to prove an offence and the evidence of a solitary wholly reliable witness would suffice the purpose.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"charges under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/20\/free-fight-without-intent-humiliate-member-sc-st-not-offence-under-sc-st-act-jharkhand-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":270893,"position":2},"title":"Free fight without any intent to humiliate a member of SC\/ST not an offence under SC\/ST Act: Jharkhand HC","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court said that it was apparent that the incidence took place on 11-01-2008 for which the case and counter case were lodged.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/22\/allahabad-high-court-sets-free-rape-convict-languishing-in-jail-from-past-21-years-showed-anguish-on-authorities-for-non-considering-his-for-remission-legal-research-legal-news-u\/","url_meta":{"origin":270893,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad High Court sets free rape convict languishing in jail from past 21 years; Showed anguish on authorities for notconsidering him for remission","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by Special Judge convicting the accused under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019) read with Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (\u2018SC\/ST Act\u2019) and sentencing him to life imprisonment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301702,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/16\/allahabad-hc-grants-bail-to-two-christian-persons-accused-of-mass-conversion-of-sc-and-st\/","url_meta":{"origin":270893,"position":4},"title":"Read why Allahabad High Court granted bail to two Christian persons accused of Mass conversion of SCs &amp; STs","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court noted that there does not appear to be any material to show that accused persons had used any undue influence or allurement to the villagers for mass conversion.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":195320,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/19\/arrest-under-sc-st-act-1989-must-be-made-with-prior-approval-of-ssp-concerned-and-only-after-recording-reasons-of-arrest-in-writing\/","url_meta":{"origin":270893,"position":5},"title":"Arrest under SC &#038; ST Act, 1989 must be made with prior approval of SSP concerned, and only after recording reasons of arrest in writing","author":"Saba","date":"April 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: While disposing off the present appeal wherein the appellant was charged under Section 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(d) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the Bench of J.P. Gupta, J., reiterated the recent Supreme Court decision in Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270893\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}