{"id":270640,"date":"2022-07-26T10:00:47","date_gmt":"2022-07-26T04:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=270640"},"modified":"2022-07-29T11:20:11","modified_gmt":"2022-07-29T05:50:11","slug":"delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely because sometimes sexual abuse results in tying of knot between the victim and the accused in violation of provisions of law or results in birth of a child, it does not mitigate the act of the petitioner in any manner, since the consent of a minor is immaterial and inconsequential in law.<\/p>\n<p>A complaint was filed by the mother of the victim alleging that some unknown person had kidnapped her daughter of 15 years, missing since 09-07-2019. On investigation, the complainant was charged for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\">363<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561687\">366<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\">376<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\">4<\/a> &amp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\">6<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (\u2018POCSO Act&#8217;) as the victim was recovered along with her 8-month-old female child from the house of petitioner\/accused and was about 1\u00bd months pregnant. The complainant was arrested and thus, the present bail application was filed contending that the victim is wife of the petitioner-accused and is suffering on account of incarceration of the petitioner and he needs to take care of his wife and child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">State submitted that that victim was merely 14 years and 06 months of age, at the time she was lured and kidnapped by the petitioner and the entire machinery was kept in the dark by the petitioner who deliberately concealed the particulars of the victim and misled the investigating agency on the wrong path despite filing of the Habeas Corpus petition by the mother of the victim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that alleged marriage with a minor as claimed by the petitioner is in violation of the provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825992\">Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Placing reliance on <i>Independent Thought<\/i> v. <i>Union of India<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/TFJIdrPV\">(2017) 10 SC 800<\/a> and <i>Jayanti Lal Dabgar<\/i> v <i>State of Gujarat<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5tWCuOjq\">(2015) 7 SCC 359<\/a> wherein it was observed that sexual intercourse or sexual act by a man, even with his own wife under 15 years of age, has been classified as rape, the Court opined that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">sexual relationship with minor is prohibited and the law clearly treats them as offences even if the same is based upon alleged consent of a minor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that such <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">incidents of luring a minor and entering into physical relationship, accused thereafter claiming consent of the minor, cannot be treated in a routine manner. Merely because the petitioner has claimed that marriage had been performed with the victim in a temple, the same cannot sanctify the offence as the victim was a minor and under 15 years of age at the time of the incident. The claim of marriage is also yet to be proved on record.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court rejected the bail being devoid of evidence in favour of accused suggesting consent of the parents to take their minor daughter away from their lawful custody along with constantly misleading the Court during investigation and his claim of consent by minor for sexual intercourse being irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Jagbir v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/33K9jIIR\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 2159<\/a>, decided on 22-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Himanshu Sharma and Mr. Haider Khan, Advocates, for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Advocate for Ms. Supriya Juneja, Advocate for complainant with Complainant in-person, for State.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sexual abuse resulting in tying of knot between the victim and the accused in violation of provisions of law or birth of a child, does not mitigate the act of the petitioner in any manner, since the consent of a minor is immaterial and inconsequential in law<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269169,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3239,3118,2583,30523,4021,3229,9471,23204,50461,2572,23834,2727],"class_list":["post-270640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consent","tag-Habeas_Corpus","tag-Investigation","tag-kidnap","tag-marriage","tag-minor","tag-offence","tag-pocso","tag-polygraph-test","tag-Rape","tag-sexual-intercourse","tag-Victim"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-26T04:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-29T05:50:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-26T04:30:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-29T05:50:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":560,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"consent\",\"Habeas Corpus\",\"Investigation\",\"kidnap\",\"Marriage\",\"minor\u00a0\",\"offence\",\"POCSO\",\"polygraph test\",\"Rape\",\"sexual intercourse\",\"Victim\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-26T04:30:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-29T05:50:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/07\\\/26\\\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected | SCC Times","description":"Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected","og_description":"Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-07-26T04:30:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-29T05:50:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected","datePublished":"2022-07-26T04:30:47+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-29T05:50:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/"},"wordCount":560,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg","keywords":["consent","Habeas Corpus","Investigation","kidnap","Marriage","minor\u00a0","offence","POCSO","polygraph test","Rape","sexual intercourse","Victim"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/","name":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg","datePublished":"2022-07-26T04:30:47+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-29T05:50:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. rejected bail to an accused allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl of 14 years. The Court held that merely","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-defense-of-consensual-sexual-intercourse-immaterial-if-victim-is-minor-bail-rejected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court: Defense of consensual sexual intercourse immaterial if victim is minor; Bail rejected"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-2.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270640\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269169"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}