{"id":270621,"date":"2022-07-25T14:00:39","date_gmt":"2022-07-25T08:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=270621"},"modified":"2022-07-29T11:17:19","modified_gmt":"2022-07-29T05:47:19","slug":"allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/","title":{"rendered":"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court<\/span>: The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners seeking protection of their lives and liberties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner 1 was married to respondent 3 and there were children born out of the said wedlock. Petitioner 1 alleged that she was harassed as respondent 3 had come in contact with bad elements and used to come home only at midnight. In the complaint dated 01-09-2021, she also alleged that on the night of 07-09-2021, he came with his friends and wanted her to have illicit relations with his friends which she refused and at night, when her husband and children were sleeping, she left the matrimonial home. She later on went to live with petitioner 2.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that till September, 2021, petitioner 1 was with respondent 3 and the daughters but it has not been disclosed that since when petitioner 1 and 2 were living as husband and wife and as to when respondent 3 had threatened their relation. The Court was unable to reconcile as to how the incident of 07-09-2021 can be narrated in a complaint dated 01-09-2021.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court distinguished on facts the case of <i>Indra Sarma<\/i> v. <i>V.K.V. Sarma<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kzeAig4U\">(2013) 15 SCC 755<\/a> relied on by the counsel of the petitioner regarding the belief of relationship where there is domestic violence perpetrated and defence was taken that there was no marriage. However, the Court said the marriage and family are social institution of vital importance reiterating relevant part of the same judgment. The Court thus concluded that it cannot be said that the relationship outside the matrimony has also to be recognized under Indian law. Paragraph 52 of the said judgment categorically mentions that Live-in relation as such is a relation which has not been socially accepted in India unlike many other Countries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court clarified that the contention that India is governed by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\">Constitution of India<\/a> and we are not living in primitive days makes no difference as in the present case it cannot be said that petitioners are living as husband and wife and it is evident from the record and submission that the marriage of petitioner 1 with respondent 3 has not yet been dissolved. Further, there was nothing on record to show as to when respondent 3 threatened her while being in live-in-relation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><b>Constitution of India may permit live-in relation but, this writ petition is nothing else but filed with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on their illegal relationship.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court determined whether there is any act, omission or conduct of the respondent which would permit us to issue direction of no coercive action or granting protection and found that petitioner 1 had come with incorrect facts deliberately as her complaint has not culminated into F.I.R. being lodged. The Court was of the opinion that there are grey areas in the facts of the case which police will have to investigate<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">. There is no threat perception, and no such complaint has been made to the police authority.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petition was dismissed with costs Rs.5,000\/- because there is no threat perception as prayed by petitioners from respondent 3.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sunita Devi v. State of U.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t0Dr96QV\">2022 SCC OnLine All 488<\/a>, decided on 18-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Shyam Shankar Mishra, Advocate, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">C.S.C., Counsel for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269339,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31563,4361,27214,4021,3151,48958],"class_list":["post-270621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-illicit-relationship","tag-life-and-liberty","tag-live-in-relationship","tag-marriage","tag-matrimonial_dispute","tag-threat"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-25T08:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-29T05:47:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-25T08:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-29T05:47:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship | SCC Times","description":"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship","og_description":"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-07-25T08:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-29T05:47:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/","name":"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-07-25T08:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-29T05:47:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. dismissed a writ petition with costs which was filed by the petitioners","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/allahabad-high-court-constitution-of-india-does-not-permit-to-issue-mandamus-when-there-is-no-threat-perception-alleged-or-transpired-petition-dismissed-for-filing-with-a-purpose-of-obtaining-seal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Allahabad High Court | Constitution of India does not permit to issue mandamus when there is no threat perception alleged or transpired; Petition dismissed for filing with a purpose of obtaining seal of this Court on illegal relationship"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":253170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/24\/live-in-relationship-6\/","url_meta":{"origin":270621,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | \u201cUnholy Alliance\u201d; HC denies protection to married woman who was residing in live-in with another man","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Calling it \u201cunholy alliance\u201d, Sant Parkash, J., denied protection to a married woman who was residing in live-in with another man. The petitioners had approached the Court for issuance of directions to the Police official to protect their life and liberty from the hands of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252955,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/19\/live-in-relationship-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":270621,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | \u201cLive-in relationship cannot be at the cost of social fabric of this country\u201d; Police protection rejected to a live-in couple","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Satish Kumar Sharma J. dismissed the petition and rejected police protection to a couple. The instant petition was filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code i.e. CrPC for protection of life and personal liberty of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners sought police protection on account of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":367499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/24\/all-hc-denies-protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":270621,"position":2},"title":"Protection to live-in couple without dissolution of marriage would amount to protection against bigamy: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, two adults were living in a live-in relationship and the women involved was a legally wedded wife of another man and their marriage was not dissolved yet.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Protection to live-in couple without dissolution of marriage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Protection-to-live-in-couple-without-dissolution-of-marriage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/20\/live-in-relationship-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":270621,"position":3},"title":"P&#038;H HC | No offence by married person being in live-in; HC differs with Allahabad High Court\u2019s decision","author":"Editor","date":"September 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Amol Rattan Singh, J., held that since adultery is not an offence, no offence would be committed by a married person by him\/her being in live-in even when his\/her divorce petition is pending before the Court. By the instant petition, the petitioners had sought issuance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/14\/allahabad-hc-stays-dsp-suspension-over-alleged-extramarital-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":270621,"position":4},"title":"Allahabad High Court stays UP Government\u2019s suspension order against DSP over alleged relationship outside marriage","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the standing counsel to file a counter affidavit within four weeks. A rejoinder affidavit, if any, was permitted to be filed within two weeks thereafter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295089,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/girl-denies-illegal-detention-parents-kerala-high-court-dismisses-habeas-corpus-by-boyfriend\/","url_meta":{"origin":270621,"position":5},"title":"Kerala High Court dismisses habeas corpus by boyfriend after girl denies illegal detention by parents","author":"Editor","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The alleged detenue told the Court that though she was in love with the petitioner and willing to marry him, she did not want to go with him but would prefer to go with her mother.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270621\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269339"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}