{"id":270373,"date":"2022-07-20T11:00:15","date_gmt":"2022-07-20T05:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=270373"},"modified":"2022-08-05T10:45:24","modified_gmt":"2022-08-05T05:15:24","slug":"jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/","title":{"rendered":"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Jharkhand High Court<\/span>: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420<\/a>, 406<\/a>, 34<\/a>, 120-B<\/a> of the Penal Code<\/a> on the ground that only the directors of the company were made accused in the FIR and not the Company. There was no mention of the bad intentions of the directors in the FIR too.<\/p>\n

Facts:<\/p>\n

The FIR was lodged by the informant alleging that the informant and his wife opened two Demat Trading Accounts through franchisee agent, Jitendra Agarwal, in M\/S Bonanza Portfolio Ltd (\u2018Company’), with its proprietary\/partners with S.K.Goyal, S.P. Goyal, V.K. Agarwal, Shiv Kumar Goyal and Narendra Singh.<\/p>\n

The informant used to invest money in Yes Bank Shares’ Future and delivery stock. The Company sold the shares of the informant without disclosing it to the franchisee broker and committed a breach of trust. The shares were valued at the lowest price of Rs. 4.95 with a credit balance of Rs. 5,43,150.46 in the accounts of the informant and his wife.<\/p>\n

Allegedly, instead of just selling those shares whose value equaled the short amount, the Company sold all the shares from the informant’s and his wife’s account, from the Delhi office. The Company was not supposed to sell the shares as the trading work for the informant was done by the local broker, Jitendra Agarwal. The Company neither informed the informant nor the local broker about the sale and the difference margin.<\/p>\n

The informant claimed that the five partners of the Company, under a conspiracy, committed fraud, cheating and breach of trust by selling all shares of Yes Bank of informant’s and his wife’s account. It is also claimed that on 06-03-2020, mighty share brokers with the help of the operators cause fall of Yes Bank shares by 85% for few seconds and sold off all shares for making wrongful gains. Due to this, there was a loss of Rs. 41,78,307.67 in both the accounts. On 11-03-2022 and 12-03-2022 the informant made representation to the Company but did not receive any reply.<\/p>\n

Arguments:<\/p>\n

Senior counsel, M.S. Mittal, appearing for the petitioners\/ partners of the Company submitted that the Company has not been accused in the FIR and relied on the Sharad Kumar Sanghi<\/i> v. Sangita Rane,<\/i> (2015) 12 SCC 781<\/a>, in which the Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceeding on on the same ground.<\/p>\n

Relying on the case Shiv Kumar Jatia<\/i> v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/i>, (2019) 17 SCC 193<\/a>, he submitted that as no specific allegation were made against the Directors in the FIR and in absence of any material to prove that the Directors had criminal intent, continuation of such proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.<\/p>\n

Lastly, he submitted that the Court is competent to quash the FIR itself as the dispute is purely civil in nature and there is mechanism of arbitration and the Member Client Agreements are safeguarding the company. He submitted that as the Directors are not directly alleged and the company is not made an accused, the entire proceeding is fit to be quashed.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the informants submitted that in the judgment relied on by senior counsel in the case Sharad Kumar Sanghi<\/i> v. Sangita Rane<\/i> (Supra), the complaint was filed, cognizance was taken by the Court against the Managing Director of the Company, and the Company was not made as an accused, this was the reason the entire proceeding was quashed. In none of the cases relied on by the petitioners, the FIR has been quashed. Hence, it was not justified for the Court to interfere at this stage as the investigation was still going on in the case at hand and there are parameters for quashing FIR.<\/p>\n

Observation and Analysis:<\/p>\n

The Court observed that law is well settled that if a wrong has been done by a company, the representatives of the wrong doer can be proceeded with, where the company is made a party<\/span>, which is lacking in the case in hand. The entire allegation is civil in nature.The Court further noted that there is no doubt that criminal proceedings and civil proceedings can go simultaneously if there are allegations of criminality, and it is proved both the cases can go simultaneously. However, it is well settled that if the criminality is not made out, the continuation of criminal case will amount to an abuse of the process of law.<\/span><\/p>\n

After considering the arguments of both sides, the Court analyzed that it is a fit case to exercise the power under Section 482<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a>. Accordingly, the FIR and the entire criminal proceeding was quashed.<\/p>\n

[S.K. Goel v. State of Jharkhand, 2022 SCC OnLine Jhar 654<\/a>, decided on 12-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Mr. M.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate, for the Petitioners;<\/p>\n

Mr. Ashish Kumar, A.C. to G.A. II, for the State;<\/p>\n

Mr. Shailesh, Advocate, for the O.P. No.2.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269625,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34595,31359,9091,38654,50352,6721,13021,20481],"class_list":["post-270373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-company-law","tag-corporate-law","tag-criminal-proceedings","tag-offences-by-companies","tag-quashment-of-fir","tag-quashment-of-proceedings","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-vicarious-liability"],"yoast_head":"\nJharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-20T05:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-05T05:15:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1337\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/\",\"name\":\"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-20T05:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-05T05:15:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1337,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party | SCC Times","description":"Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party","og_description":"Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-07-20T05:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-05T05:15:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1337,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/","name":"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-07-20T05:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-05T05:15:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., quashed the criminal proceeding registered under Sections 420, 406, 34, 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg","width":1337,"height":888,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/20\/jharkhand-high-court-criminal-proceedings-against-directors-cannot-continue-when-the-company-has-not-been-arrayed-as-a-party\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jharkhand High Court | Criminal proceedings against Directors cannot continue when the Company has not been arrayed as a party"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":269841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/08\/allahabad-high-court-sections-4-not-when-criminal-jurisdiction-is-invoked\/","url_meta":{"origin":270373,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court | Sections 4 & 5 CrPC only applicable to proceedings under Special Acts; not when criminal jurisdiction is invoked","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Gautam Chowdhary, JJ. dismissed a petition which was filed praying for quashment of the impugned FIR under Sections 420, 406, 120-B Penal Code, 1860. First informant aged about 28 years, does business and petitioner 1 and 2 are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275215,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/07\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-hc-matrimonial-disputes-settlement-between-parties-high-court-inherent-power-quashing-criminal-proceedings-compromise-reached-chance-of-conviction-bleak-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":270373,"position":1},"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | To prevent the “frittering away of the fruits of compromise” HC can quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences if parties have arrived at a settlement","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deciding the instant petition wherein the Court was faced with the issue that whether it has the power to quash the proceedings, particularly when some of the offences alleged to have been committed by petitioner and others are non-compoundable in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/proceedings-ulterior-motive-wreaking-personal-vengeance-court-attending-circumstances-due-care-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":270373,"position":2},"title":"Courts must look into attending circumstances with due care in cases based on ulterior motive for wreaking personal vengeance: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court noted that there are multiple FIRs that have been registered over a period, thereby attracting the issue of wreaking vengeance out of private or personal grudge as alleged.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"attending circumstances","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/attending-circumstances.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/criminal-proceedings-cannot-be-permitted-to-degenerate-into-weapon-of-harassment-hcs-must-quash-frivolous-firs-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":270373,"position":3},"title":"Criminal proceedings cannot be permitted to degenerate into weapon of harassment; HCs must quash frivolous FIRs: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and\/or under Article 226 of the Constitution is designed to achieve salutary purpose that criminal proceedings ought not to be permitted to degenerate into weapon of harassment.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/1991-balwant-singh-multani-disappearance-sc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-punjabs-former-dgp-sumedh-singh-saini-in-a-fresh-fir-alleging-murder\/","url_meta":{"origin":270373,"position":4},"title":"1991 Balwant Singh Multani disappearance| SC grants anticipatory bail to Punjab’s former DGP Sumedh Singh Saini in a fresh FIR alleging murder","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah*, JJ has granted anticipatory bail to Punjab\u2019s former DGP Sumesh Singh Saini in Balwant Singh\u00a0Multani disappearance case and has directed, \u201c\u2026 he shall be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000\/\u00ad\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/07\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-proceedings-in-non-compoundable-offences-can-be-quashed-on-the-basis-of-compromise-between-accused-and-victim\/","url_meta":{"origin":270373,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Proceedings in non-compoundable offences can be quashed on the basis of compromise between accused and victim","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In the case relating to the compundable offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, 1860 and the non-compoundable offence under Section 13 of the Punjab Prevention of Human Smuggling Act, 2012, Anoop Chitkara, J., invoking the power under Section 482 CrPC, has quashed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270373\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269625"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}