{"id":270279,"date":"2022-07-18T14:00:54","date_gmt":"2022-07-18T08:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=270279"},"modified":"2022-07-20T10:12:36","modified_gmt":"2022-07-20T04:42:36","slug":"indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court<\/span>: In an interesting case regarding insurance claim, the Division Bench comprising Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*<\/b>, JJ., reversed the NCDRC’s decision directing the insurance company to indemnify the insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim.<\/p>\n

The Court held,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe delay in processing the claim and delay in repudiation could be one of the several factors for holding an insurer guilty of deficiency in service. But it cannot be the only factor.\u201d<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

The instant appeal had been filed under Section 23<\/a> of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986<\/a> against the impugned order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) directing the appellant-insurer to make payment of the sum assured under a Marine Insurance Policy.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

The complainant took a policy of insurance for a sum of Rs.1,62,70,000 from the insurer, covering risks to the Mechanical Sailing Vessel MSV Sea Queen for the period 04-10-2010 to 03-10-2011.<\/p>\n

On 30-05-2011, the subject vessel allegedly sank in the high sea between Oman and Pakistan, due to bad weather and rough tides, which damaged the lower portion of the vessel. Consequently, the complainant lodged a claim with the insurer. Since the claim was neither admitted nor repudiated, the complainant filed a consumer complaint before NCDRC.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the insurer repudiated the claim by a letter dated 04-09-2013 on the ground that the subject vessel was engaged in illegal activities and was hijacked by Somali pirates and that in any case, the Meteorological reports of Oman and India showed absolutely fair-weather conditions on 29-05-2011 and 30-05-2011.<\/p>\n

Findings of NCDRC<\/p>\n

The NCDRC allowed the claim on the basis of the following findings:<\/p>\n

(i) Though the incident took place on 30-05-2011, the surveyor was appointed on 03-06-2011 and a Final Survey Report was sent on 25-03-2013, the claim was repudiated by the appellant only on 04-09-2013, i.e., after more than two years, therefore, the inordinate delay violating Regulation 9 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Protection of Policyholders’ Interests) Regulations, 2000, constituted deficiency in service;<\/p>\n

(ii) Though the insurer raised a dispute with regard to the place and nature of the incident, the claim of the complainant was supported by the statement of the crew members of the subject vessel which was recorded by the Superintendent of Customs and the Immigration Officer;<\/p>\n

(iii) The Report of the Meteorological Departments relied upon by the insurer had nothing to do with the place of the accident;<\/p>\n

(iv) The plea of the complainant that SOS\/ distress calls were made from the subject vessel, was corroborated by the statement of the crew members; and<\/p>\n

(v) It was too late for the insurer to raise a dispute with regard to the value of the subject vessel.<\/p>\n

In view of the above findings, the NCDRC directed the insurer to pay the complainant, the sum assured of Rs.1,62,70,000 together with interest at 9% per annum.<\/p>\n

Factual Analysis by the Court<\/p>\n

The complainant’s version was that the subject vessel left Djibouti on 21-05-2011 on its return journey to India but on 30-05-2011, it encountered bad weather and rough tides when it was between Oman and Pakistan. The crew of the subject vessel made a distress call, which was received by the crew of another vessel-MSV Chetak.<\/p>\n

Since the statements of the crew members of the subject vessel were also corroborated by the Captain of the rescuing vessel MSV Chetak, the NCDRC found the version of the complainant had been proved. The Court remarked,<\/p>\n

\u201cBut what the NCDRC failed to see was that there were more questions that remained unanswered in the version of the complainant and that there were more missing links.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n

Can receipt time of SOS message and the actual time of rescue be the same?<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

The head of the rescuing vessel revealed to have heard the SOS call at 10:00 am but according to the head of the subject vessel, they were rescued at 10:00 am. The Court opined that this crucial contradiction had been completely overlooked by the NCDRC. The Court noted that surprisingly, the inquiry by the Surveyors with Muscat Radio revealed that no SOS calls were made nor was any response from the rescuing vessel reported. Similarly, the Meteorological Departments of both countries namely Oman and India confirmed that the weather for the specific area coordinates, Latitude 23=40\u00b0 N and Longitude 61 =43\u00b0 E, was fair.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court remarked,<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is common knowledge that the time of receipt of the SOS message by the rescuing vessel and the actual time of rescue of the crew of the sinking vessel cannot be the same. Even according to the complainant, the subject vessel MSV Sea Queen could travel only at a speed of 67 knots. Unless the rescuing vessel is in close proximity, the time of the SOS call and the time of rescue cannot be the same.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n

Deviation from the set route<\/p>\n

Admittedly, the normal practice for the Indian Dhows trading from Indian West Coast to the Arabian Gulf Ports and Yemen\/Africa, in the month of May is to sail along the coast of Southern Oman and after crossing Kuria Muria Islands and Ras Madraka and set course North easterly to Gujarat. But the coordinates provided by the rescuing vessel showed that the rescuing vessel was positioned at 200 miles North. Therefore, the Court observed that the Surveyor was rightly compelled to draw the inference that subject vessel could not have been in the area where she reportedly sank.<\/p>\n

Noting that the Directorate General (DG) of Shipping had issued a Circular dated 31-03-2010 prohibiting the operations\/trading in waters South or West of the line joining Salalah and Male, the Court opined that the Circulars issued by the DG Shipping, especially with regard to the safety and security of the vessels and the crew are to be read as part and parcel of the policy conditions. <\/span><\/p>\n

Allegation of Piracy Attack<\/p>\n

Regarding the allegation of a piracy attack, the Court noted that there was a query on 25-10-2010 from both the coast guard and DG Shipping about a piracy attack on the subject vessel, and the same was denied by the complainant in its reply.<\/p>\n

Again on 27-10-2010, a query was made through email about the position of the vessel on 23-10-2010, the current position of the Dhow, and the crew list. To which the complainant had replied on the same day that the vessel was near Madarka Yemen on 25-10-2010 and that the exact position on 23-10-2010 was not known.<\/p>\n

Hence, it was clear that there was no piracy attack. However, the Court held that the exchange of emails about the suspected piracy attack demonstrated that at least the vessel was plying in the prohibited location.<\/p>\n

Discrepancies on the Part of the Complainant<\/p>\n

After analysing the facts of the case, the Court noted the following discrepancies on the part of the complainant:<\/p>\n

(i) The complainant did not state anywhere in the complaint where exactly the mishap had happened.<\/p>\n

(ii) The complainant relied on Column 47 of the Marine Casualty Report issued by the Indian Marine Mercantile Department, to show that the vessel sank due to bad weather. But interestingly, column 47 of the report does not contain any detail except stating broadly that there was rough weather.<\/p>\n

(iii) Moreover, Columns 50 to 53 exposed the falsity of the statements made by the captains of both the ships to the Customs Authorities as according to Columns 50 and 51, the incident happened at 4:00 a.m. local time on 30-05-2011 but the captains of both the ships state that the incident had happened at approximately 10:00 a.m.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the Court held that the delay on the part of the Insurance Company in securing the Final Survey Report and the further delay in issuing the letter of repudiation, could not per se lead to the complaint being allowed. The Court opined,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Consumer Forum which has a limited jurisdiction to find out if there was any deficiency in service, could not have allowed the complaint on the basis of sketchy pleadings supported by doubtful evidence.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n

Consequently, the Court concluded that the NCDRC was in error in allowing the complaint since there was no categorical evidence of any deficiency in service on the part of the insurer. Hence, the appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside.<\/p>\n

[New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Shashikala J. Ayachi, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 874<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by: Justice V. Ramasubramanian<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Gaurav Agrawal, Advocate, for the Appellant;<\/p>\n

Senior Advocate Siddhartha Dave, Advocate, for the Insured.<\/p>\n

\n

*Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: In an interesting case regarding insurance claim, the Division Bench comprising Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*, JJ., reversed the NCDRC’s <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":55471,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[18321,11521,39194,2617,50309,3095,50307,50311,50316],"class_list":["post-270279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-consumer-protection-act","tag-deficiency-in-service","tag-indemnity","tag-insurance_claim","tag-marine-insurance-policy","tag-NCDRC","tag-piracy-attack","tag-ship-hijack","tag-weather"],"yoast_head":"\nIndian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCDRC decision directing insurance company to indemnify insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCDRC decision directing insurance company to indemnify insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-18T08:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-20T04:42:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-18T08:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-20T04:42:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"NCDRC decision directing insurance company to indemnify insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC | SCC Times","description":"NCDRC decision directing insurance company to indemnify insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC","og_description":"NCDRC decision directing insurance company to indemnify insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-07-18T08:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-20T04:42:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/","name":"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg","datePublished":"2022-07-18T08:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-20T04:42:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"NCDRC decision directing insurance company to indemnify insured of a Marine Insurance Policy on the sole ground of delay in repudiating claim","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/18\/indian-dhows-sinking-hijacking-by-somali-pirates-delay-in-repudiating-insurance-claim-cannot-be-the-only-factor-to-presume-deficiency-in-service-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Indian Dhows sinking & hijacking by Somali Pirates| Delay in repudiating insurance claim cannot be the only factor to presume deficiency in service: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/SupremeCourt-of-india-e1474695737123.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":371423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/bom-hc-consumer-not-penalised-insurer-cheque-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":270279,"position":0},"title":"Consumer cannot be penalised for insurer’s operational negligence with premium cheque: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe dishonour was not due to insufficiency of funds but due to technical problems in the aftermath of the floods.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consumer insurer cheque negligence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/18\/act-of-terrorism-interpretation-insurance-claim-repudiation-supreme-court-judgment-india-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":270279,"position":1},"title":"Can insurer rely on statutory interpretation of \u201cacts of terrorism\u201d to repudiate insurance claim where the policy itself defines the term? Supreme Court decides\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an insurance repudiation case the Division Bench of Ajay\u202fRastogi and Abhay\u202fS.\u202fOka*, JJ., held that where the insurance policy expressly defines a term the insurance company cannot rely on Statutory interpretation of the same to repudiate the insurance claim.\u00a0\u00a0 The Court reversed National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\u2019s (NCDRC)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333008,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/consumer-protection-deciphering-non-standard-settlement-of-motor-insurance-claims\/","url_meta":{"origin":270279,"position":2},"title":"Consumer Protection | Deciphering Non-Standard Settlement of Motor Insurance Claims","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Namrata Chandorkar*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Consumer Protection","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Consumer-Protection.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Consumer-Protection.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Consumer-Protection.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Consumer-Protection.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/sc-clarifies-that-whether-company-can-file-consumer-complaint-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":270279,"position":3},"title":"Can a company file a consumer complaint under Consumer Protection Act, 1986? SC clarifies","author":"Editor","date":"April 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a body corporate was brought within the definition of \u2018person\u2019, indicating that the legislature realized the incongruity in the unamended provision and rectified the anomaly by including the word \u2018company\u2019 in the definition of \u2018person\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consumer complaint by company under Consumer Protection Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6460,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/09\/29\/insurance-claim-for-stolen-tractor-denied-due-to-delay-in-lodging-fir\/","url_meta":{"origin":270279,"position":4},"title":"Insurance claim for stolen Tractor denied due to delay in lodging FIR","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 29, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): On account of delay in lodging FIR and intimation to Insurance Company, NCDRC has dismissed a revision petition filed by the petitioner whose tractor was stolen and his insurance claim was rejected by the insurance company. Earlier the petitioner was denied relief by District\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261752,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/14\/explained-can-an-insurance-claim-be-repudiated-in-case-of-delay-in-informing-the-insurance-company-regarding-the-theft-of-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":270279,"position":5},"title":"Explained| Can an insurance claim be repudiated in case of delay in informing the Insurance Company regarding the theft of vehicle?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, JJ has held that an Insurance Company cannot repudiate a claim merely on the ground that there was a delay in intimating it about the occurrence of the theft of vehicle. The Court was deciding a case relating to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-80.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-80.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-80.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-80.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-80.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270279\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}