{"id":270011,"date":"2022-07-13T13:00:10","date_gmt":"2022-07-13T07:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=270011"},"modified":"2022-07-14T14:38:06","modified_gmt":"2022-07-14T09:08:06","slug":"punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/span>: Fateh Deep Singh, J., dismissed a review application on the ground that no mistake or error was found on the records which would be self-evident, and any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1<\/a> of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (\u2018CPC\u2019).<\/p>\n

Order 47 Rule 1 states that a judgment\/ order could be sought only if there is a discovery of new and important matters\/ evidence which was not in the knowledge of the applicant even after due diligence and if the same was not produced by the applicant at the time judgment\/ decree was passed or there was some mistake or error on the face of record.<\/p>\n

The applicant made assailments on merits and interpretation of the evidence over the family settlement dated 15-03-1985, 17-07-1995 and 29-03-1997. The applicant has laid challenge over the documents in question executed between them on merits which is not permissible. Another argument was that self-contradictions and self- defeating stands cannot be taken into consideration.<\/p>\n

The respondent relied on Sasi<\/i> v. Aravindakshan Nair<\/i>, (2017) 4 SCC 692<\/a> and Parsion Devi<\/i> v. Sumitri Devi<\/i>, (1997) 8 SCC 715<\/a>, where the Supreme Court laid down that a review application cannot be disguised as an appeal for getting an incorrect decision reheard and corrected. It was also held that to rectify any patent error on the records, a review has to be filed within the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the issue was whether an application be made to reheard and correct an erroneous decision outside the ambit of Order 47 Rule 1The Court after perusal of the arguments advanced held that there was no such mistake or error on the face of the record and no merit was found. Hence, the application was dismissed.<\/p>\n

[Paramjit Singh v. Gurdial Singh, 2022 SCC OnLine P&H 1637<\/a>, decided on 05-07-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Fateh Deep Singh, J., dismissed a review application on the ground that no mistake or error was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":269629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,11211,8331,32045,31754,50171,2897,44244],"class_list":["post-270011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-application","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-documents","tag-error","tag-ph-highcourt","tag-Review","tag-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"\nPunjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-13T07:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-14T09:08:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/\",\"name\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-13T07:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-14T09:08:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing | SCC Times","description":"any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing","og_description":"any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-07-13T07:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-14T09:08:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","name":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-07-13T07:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-14T09:08:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Punjab and Haryana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":146181,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/03\/multiple-proceedings-on-same-cause-of-action-is-abuse-of-court-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":270011,"position":0},"title":"Multiple proceedings on same cause of action is abuse of court process","author":"Saba","date":"August 3, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Kenya at Nairobi: \u00a0It is a settled law that a litigant has no right to pursue pari passu two processes which will have the same effect in two courts at the same time with a view of obtaining victory in one of the process or in both.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/nclt-if-an-applicant-finds-the-finding-of-a-judgment-to-be-erroneous-can-he-be-permitted-to-seek-rehearing-of-appeal-under-r-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-tribunal-considers\/","url_meta":{"origin":270011,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | If an applicant finds the finding of a Judgment to be erroneous, can he be permitted to seek rehearing of appeal under R. 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016? Tribunal considers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate\u00a0Tribunal(NCLAT): The Division Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson) and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), while addressing the present appeal observed that: Exercise of inherent powers under Rule 11 has limitations and same cannot be enlarged to review the decisions. Company Appeal titled\u00a0Anubhav Anilkumar Agarwal v.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/possession-of-joint-land-by-one-co-owner-valid-in-absence-of-proof-showing-disagreement-between-other-co-owners-punjab-haryana-high-court-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":270011,"position":2},"title":"Possession of joint land by one co-owner valid in absence of proof showing disagreement between other co-owners; Punjab & Haryana High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Manjari Nehru Kaul, J., while dealing with a revision petition for setting aside the order passed by the Civil Judge in Execution Petition held that the petitioner was unable to bring any material that showed that other co-owners were not agreeable to take possession. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/judicial-powers-and-duties-of-permanent-and-additional-judges-are-same-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":270011,"position":3},"title":"Permanent Judges and Additional Judges equally duty bound to perform judicial work: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The primary duty of the office of a Judge is to render justice to the litigants by deciding the cases that are assigned to him and a Judge appointed under Article 224 of the Constitution of India is as much under oath to perform this duty, as a Judge appointed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/11\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-application-against-order-remand\/","url_meta":{"origin":270011,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Review is not an appeal in disguise\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses review application against Order of Remand","author":"Editor","date":"May 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"There are substantive differences between review and appeal. A decision's cryptic nature alone does not warrant a review.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271413,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":270011,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., dismissed the revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge vide which the application for appointment was dismissed on the ground that the order refusing appointment does not decide any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=270011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270011\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/269629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=270011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=270011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=270011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}