{"id":268987,"date":"2022-06-24T16:00:15","date_gmt":"2022-06-24T10:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=268987"},"modified":"2022-07-01T14:12:02","modified_gmt":"2022-07-01T08:42:02","slug":"rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka High Court<\/span>: M Nagaprasanna, J. allowed the petition filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550512\">33(5)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (\u2018POCSO Act&#8217; ) is not applicable now.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was alleged to have indulged in acts which had become an offence punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\">4<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\">6<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">POCSO Act<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\">376<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC&#8217;). FIR was thereby filed, and the matter is pending consideration before the Sessions Judge. The petitioner filed an application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519587\">311<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Criminal Procedure Code<\/a> (\u2018CrPC&#8217;) seeking recall of the victim for further cross-examination which was rejected. Aggrieved by this, an instant petition was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that in terms of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519587\">311<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a>, a Court may at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding, recall a witness for re-examination, if his evidence appears to be essential for a just decision in the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Placing reliance on <i>V N Patil<\/i> v. <i>K Niranjan Kumar<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KkYdRn0t\">(2021) 3 SCC 661<\/a> wherein it was observed that the aim of every Court is to discover the truth. Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519587\">311<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">CrPC<\/a> is one of such provisions which strengthen the arms of a court in its effort to unearth the truth except where applications are filed as an abuse of the process of law. Such discretion will have to be exercised by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in terms of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550512\">33(5)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">POCSO Act<\/a>, the Special Court must ensure that the child is not called repeatedly to testify in the Court. A reading of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550512\">33(5)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">POCSO Act<\/a>, would clearly indicate the intention behind such enactment that in genuine cases the child-victim is not harassed. That would not mean that the accused can be deprived of his right to cross-examination in a trial, particularly, where offence punishable is beyond ten years. The mandatory nature to recall the witness for cross examination, if the evidence appears to be essential, is always necessary for a just decision in a case, except in cases where repeated applications under Section 311 CrPC are filed frivolously.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the other factor that is necessary to be noticed is, the current age of the victim once the victim crosses 18 years of age, the rigour of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550512\">33(5)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">POCSO Act<\/a> gets diluted, as it is the child-victim who shall not be called for cross examination or re-examination repeatedly. The word \u2018child&#8217; is defined under Section 2(1)(d) POCSO Act, to mean a person below 18 years of age. On the child reaching 18 years of age, the rigour under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550512\">33(5)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\">POCSO Act<\/a> gets diluted and sequentially, will not become a bar for seeking further cross-examination of the victim under Section 311 of the CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u201cthe victim ought to have been permitted to be cross-examined by accepting the application seeking to recall the witness\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mahammad Ali Akbar v. State of Karnataka, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/87VB9Nx1\">2022 SCC OnLine Kar 1048<\/a>, decided on 06-06-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr Syed Muzakkir Ahmed, Advocate, for the petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mrs KP Yashodha, Advocate, for the respondent.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna, J. allowed the petition filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":265017,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35234,19581,49856,42361,9121,2521,28334,9651,23204,49857,49858,19571],"class_list":["post-268987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adult","tag-child","tag-child-sexual-offence","tag-child-victim","tag-cross-examination","tag-Evidence","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-majority","tag-pocso","tag-s-311-crpc","tag-s-335-pocso-act","tag-sexual-offence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-24T10:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-01T08:42:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/\",\"name\":\"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-24T10:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-01T08:42:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC | SCC Times","description":"filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC","og_description":"filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-24T10:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-01T08:42:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/","name":"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-24T10:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-01T08:42:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"filed seeking further cross examination of the child victim as the victim has now attained 18 years of age and the rigour given","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/rigour-under-s-335-pocso-act-gets-diluted-once-the-child-attains-majority-kar-hc-allowed-cross-examination-under-s-311-crpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rigour under S. 33(5) POCSO Act gets diluted once the child attains majority; Kar HC allowed cross-examination under S. 311 CrPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323067,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/orissa-high-court-dismisses-petition-recalling-victim-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":268987,"position":0},"title":"POCSO| \u2018No absolute bar on recalling victim witness but each case must be evaluated on its own evidence\u2019; Orissa HC dismisses application to recall child victim to Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no absolute bar under Section 33(5) of the POCSO Act to recall a victim witness, every case has to be weighed on the strength of its own evidence and necessity of recalling the child victim.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/02\/victim-attaining-majority-during-trial-not-entitled-to-child-specific-safeguards-under-section-332-of-pocso-act-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":268987,"position":1},"title":"Victim attaining majority during trial not entitled to \u201cChild-Specific\u201d safeguards under Section 33(2) of POCSO Act: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe law... does not permit a retrospective resurrection of childhood once the individual steps into legal adulthood; and to permit otherwise would be to dilute the doctrinal rigour of age-based legal classifications and introduce subjectivity into a domain that demands exactitude.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264196,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/24\/whether-victim-under-pocso-act-can-be-permitted-to-be-cross-examined-once-she-turns-hostile-kar-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":268987,"position":2},"title":"Whether victim under POCSO Act can be permitted to be cross-examined once she turns hostile? Kar HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"March 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna J. allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter back to Sessions Judge for cross-examination. The instant petition was filed on a complaint being registered for offences punishable under Section 376(n) read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 i.e. IPC,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":372180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/del-hc-making-minor-touch-private-parts-aggravated-sexual-assault-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":268987,"position":3},"title":"Making minor touch private parts with sexual intent constitutes Aggravated Sexual Assault under POCSO Act: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Minor inconsistencies arising from age, vocabulary or manner of narration do not erode the credibility of the prosecution, particularly where the allegation relates to commission of sexual assault with sexual intent.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Making minor touch private parts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346913,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/01\/madras-hc-pocso-marriage-does-not-erase-crime\/","url_meta":{"origin":268987,"position":4},"title":"Offence under POCSO Act not against individual but against society; Subsequent marriage between accused and victim does not erase the crime: Madras HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOffence under the POCSO Act is not against individual and it is against the Society. Hence, the subsequent marriage between the convict and the victim will not take away the offence committed by the convict when the victim girl was a child. If the defence of subsequent marriage or the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/07\/man-convicted-under-pocso-act-for-penetrative-sexual-assault-on-her-daughter\/","url_meta":{"origin":268987,"position":5},"title":"Man convicted under POCSO Act for penetrative sexual assault on his daughter","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and Vinod Goel, JJ. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 6 read with Section 5(m) and (n) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268987\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/265017"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}