{"id":268978,"date":"2022-06-24T15:00:27","date_gmt":"2022-06-24T09:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=268978"},"modified":"2022-08-05T17:09:04","modified_gmt":"2022-08-05T11:39:04","slug":"gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/","title":{"rendered":"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed  on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gauhati High Court<\/span>: Rumi Kumari Phookan J. held that Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002763212\">Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006<\/a> (FSS Act) only a food inspector has the authority to investigate such offences. Hence, the court directed Maharashtra Police to pay Rs 2,00,000\/- to the petitioner as a cost to the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Facts of the case<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner, Dharampal Satyapal Ltd., is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office in New Delhi. The petitioner had been granted a license under the FSS Act, to manufacture pan-masala, which is classified as a food product.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">An FIR was registered against Md. Imran Mohammed Hanif under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561468\">188<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561570\">272<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561571\">273<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561639\">328<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\">Penal Code<\/a> (IPC) in possession of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajanigandha pan-masala, Scented Tobacco and Baba Nabaratan pan-masala, etc.<\/span> which are <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">prohibited items<\/span> of food, given the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">notification issued by the Commissioner of FSS and Drug Administration, Maharashtra, dated 20.07.2019<\/span>. As the investigation proceeded, stocks of pan-masala and tobacco were recovered from the accused. After this, the respondent visited the petitioner&#8217;s factory at Bamunimaidam, Guahati, and forcibly seized the entire machinery and articles from the factory and prepared a seizure list (panchnama).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the respondent had no jurisdiction and power to seize the factory and other articles as they had not contravened any law in Solapur, Maharashtra as well the petitioner had the license to produce pan-masala, given by the appropriate authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent contended that the search and seizure done by the respondent were by the law. Further, the respondent submitted that the petitioner stored and sold the product manufactured by the petitioner in Maharashtra which was prohibited under the notification issued under the FSS Act<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">First, the court referred to Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552114\">41<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001552115\">42<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002763212\">FSS Act<\/a>, according to which Section 41 prescribes that Food and Safety Officer have the power to search and seize food articles and Section 42 prescribes that the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Food and Safety Officer is responsible for inspection<\/span> of food business, drawing samples and sending the same to the food analyst for analysis and thereafter can launch the prosecution in an appropriate case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the court was of the view that provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519689\">4(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">all offences under any other law shall be dealt with under the enactment regulating the manner of investigation and trial, etc.<\/span> and hence, FSS being a complete statute, has an overriding effect as a Special Act to deal with such food items.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">At this juncture, the court relied on the judgment given in the case of <i>Christy Fried Gram Industry<\/i> v. <i>State of Karnataka<\/i>, 2016 Cri LJ 482, wherein the court held that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">for initiation of proceedings regarding the manufacture and supply of food to the general public are regulated under FSS Act in complete mechanism is provided under the said Act to deal with the cases concerned with the food-related laws. Section 29 of the said Act specifies the authorities responsible for enforcement of the Act and Section 30 specifies the Commissioner of Food and Safety as a competent authority to implement the provision of the Act effectively<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting that, in the case at hand, the fundamental right of the petitioner to carry out the lawful business has been hampered for such illegal conduct on the part of the investigating officer, the Court observed that<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">\u201cThe petitioner herein without there being any criminal culpability has been thrown to utter hardship and inconvenience by seizure of building as well as the article valued more than crores of rupees thereby the petitioner has been compelled to run a legal battle consuming time, energy and heavy cost while continuing such litigation before the High Court.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court held that the investigation carried out by the investigating officer was beyond its jurisdiction under the law and directed the respondent to release all the seized articles to the petitioner and pay Rs 2,00,000\/- as a cost to the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/86kCN8V1\">2022 SCC OnLine Gau 943<\/a>, decided on 16-06-2022<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate, for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\">Mr. RKD Choudhury, Advocate and Mr. M. Phukan, P.P., Assam, Advocate, for the Respondent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gauhati High Court: Rumi Kumari Phookan J. held that Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":268980,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49853,32410,5501,49852,2583,35173,49854],"class_list":["post-268978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-criminal-procedure-code-1973","tag-drug","tag-food-safety","tag-food-safety-and-standards-act-2006","tag-Investigation","tag-search-and-seizure","tag-special-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-24T09:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-05T11:39:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1332\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"889\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/\",\"name\":\"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-24T09:30:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-05T11:39:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg\",\"width\":1332,\"height\":889,\"caption\":\"Gauhati High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory | SCC Times","description":"Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory","og_description":"Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-24T09:30:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-05T11:39:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1332,"height":889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/","name":"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-24T09:30:27+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-05T11:39:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Maharashtra Police neither had the jurisdiction nor the authority to investigate offences under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg","width":1332,"height":889,"caption":"Gauhati High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/gauhati-high-court-only-food-inspectors-can-investigate-offences-under-the-fss-act-rs-2-lakhs-cost-imposed-on-maharashtra-police-for-seizing-goods-from-gauhati-factory\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gauhati High Court| Only Food Inspectors can investigate offences under the FSS Act; Rs 2 Lakhs cost imposed on Maharashtra Police for seizing goods from Gauhati factory"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gauhati_high_court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/08\/gauhati-high-court-dog-meat-consumption-naga-custom-sets-aside-ban-commercial-sale-nagaland-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":268978,"position":0},"title":"\u201cDog meat consumption is an ancient Naga custom\u201d: Gauhati High Court sets aside ban on sale of dog meat","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Consumption of dog meat is a regarded custom amongst the Nagas since times immemorial and the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 already provides for an appropriate authority to issue prohibition orders.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gauhati high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/06\/principle-against-double-jeopardy\/","url_meta":{"origin":268978,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Do principles laid under S. 300 CrPC and principle of double jeopardy under Art. 20(2) of Constitution differ? Explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Manish Pitale, J., while setting aside an impugned order explained the slight difference between principles laid down under Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from the principle of double jeopardy under Article 20 (2) of the Constitution of India. Petitioner invoked the principles of nemo\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/06\/calcutta-high-court-examines-validity-of-police-investigation-under-fss-act-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":268978,"position":2},"title":"FSSAI | Can Police, not being Food Safety Officers, investigate food safety matters punishable under IPC? Calcutta High Court examines","author":"Ritu","date":"August 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court dismissed all the three criminal revision applications seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings and deemed them groundless.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/14\/bomhc-quashes-case-against-nestle-for-allegedly-selling-sub-standard-maggie-noodles\/","url_meta":{"origin":268978,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC quashes case against Nestle India Ltd. for allegedly selling \u2018sub-standard\u2019 Maggie noodles","author":"Simranjeet","date":"February 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"If the food\/sample is tested in a laboratory which does not fall within the definition of Section 3(p) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and is not recognized by the Food Authority, the analysis made in such laboratory cannot be relied upon.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202093,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/21\/no-bar-for-prosecution-under-ipc-merely-because-provisions-of-fss-act-provide-penalties-doctrine-of-double-jeopardy-not-applicable-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":268978,"position":4},"title":"No bar for prosecution under IPC merely because provisions of FSS Act provide penalties; doctrine of double jeopardy not applicable: SC  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ. disposed of a criminal appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court whereby an FIR\u00a0 filed against the respondents was quashed. The FIR was filed against the respondents, for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/14\/rohit-jiwa-hul-ceo-contaminated-horlicks-biscuits-proceedings-quashed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":268978,"position":5},"title":"Karnataka HC quashes proceedings against HUL MD &amp; CEO Rohit Jiwa over contaminated Horlicks biscuits","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Special Court for economic offences took cognizance for offences punishable and Sections 51 and 59 of Food and Safety Standards Act, 2006 (2006 Act) and initiated proceedings against Rohit Jiwa.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"HUL CEO","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/HUL-CEO.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/HUL-CEO.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/HUL-CEO.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/HUL-CEO.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268978\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}