{"id":268478,"date":"2022-06-16T12:00:06","date_gmt":"2022-06-16T06:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=268478"},"modified":"2022-06-22T18:16:04","modified_gmt":"2022-06-22T12:46:04","slug":"mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner had\u00a0 filed Writ Petition challenging impugned order which was an interlocutory order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur, whereby the interim relief was denied to the Petitioner as he had failed to establish violation of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1hbkvwWJ\">SARFAESI Act, 2002<\/a>, in the proceedings initiated by the Respondent Bank under the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present writ petition was properly drafted and pregnant with the necessary specific pleadings. He further submitted that the DRT came to hold that under the provisions of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1hbkvwWJ\">SARFAESI Act, 2002<\/a> no interim relief was due to the petitioner. Hence, the only remedy to the petitioner is of filing of present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent\/Bank placed reliance on the recent order of Supreme Court wherein the Supreme Court had deprecated the practice of entertaining the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court reiterated Section 18(1) of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1hbkvwWJ\">SARFAESI Act, 2002<\/a> and noted that the appellate provision made it clear that the legislature in its wisdom has used the words \u201cany order\u201d made by the Debts Recovery Tribunal against which the appeal lies. The Court was of the opinion that expression \u201cany order\u201d was wide enough to include an interlocutory order drawing support from various decisions given by the High Courts of India in this regard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court considering the backdrop of the present case stated that there was nothing which made it obligatory for the Court to entertain this writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner. The Court considered the case of <em>Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Dilip Bhosale<\/em>, Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.(s). 13241-13242\/2019, decided on May 11, 2022 relied on by the Counsel\u00a0 for the respondent\/Bank and reiterated the relevant part which was:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; padding-left: 40px;\"><em>\u201cBefore parting with the order, we would like to observe that this Court is consistent of the view and can be noticed from the judgment in United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tandon <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hEX6RY7x\">(2010) 8 SCC 110,<\/a> that when a remedy under the statute is available and in the instant case which indeed was availed by the respondent\/borrower, filing of a writ petition under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/BQ00wa9M\">Article 226 of the Constitution of India<\/a> is to be discouraged by the High Court.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The interference was declined in view of availability of alternative remedy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\">[<strong>Devendra Kumar Rai v. State Bank of India, <\/strong><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VghRNAx0\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine MP 1295<\/b><\/a><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>, decided on June 13, 2022<\/strong>]<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For petitioner: Mr N.S. Ruprah<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For respondent\/Bank: Mr Prabhanshu Shukla<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":268364,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22204,35612,7201,13551],"class_list":["post-268478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternate-remedy","tag-debts-recovery-tribunal","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-\u2502-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-\u2502-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-16T06:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-22T12:46:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-16T06:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-22T12:46:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-\u2502-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-\u2502-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-16T06:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-22T12:46:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","name":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-16T06:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-22T12:46:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":337096,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/11\/mere-existence-of-alternative-remedy-not-ground-for-dismissal-writ-petition-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":268478,"position":0},"title":"Writ petition against administrative authority cannot be dismissed as &#8216;non-maintainable&#8217; merely on ground of existence of alternative remedy: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"December 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a difference between entertainability and maintainability of a writ petition. Powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be exercised in restricted circumstances and within well-defined parameters, even if there exists an alternate remedy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":189154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/15\/court-exercise-writ-jurisdiction-not-ignore-condition-imposed-law-entertaining-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":268478,"position":1},"title":"The Court, in exercise of writ jurisdiction, should not ignore a condition imposed by law for entertaining an appeal","author":"Saba","date":"February 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A civil writ petition was dismissed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ram Surat Ram Maurya, J., on the ground that the petitioner had an alternate remedy of appeal under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":195274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/16\/relief-under-writ-petition-declined-in-light-of-an-alternate-remedy\/","url_meta":{"origin":268478,"position":2},"title":"Relief under writ petition declined in light of an alternate remedy","author":"Saba","date":"April 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Michael Zothankhuma, J. declined to grant relief to the petitioner under the writ petition, in light of the facts that he had an alternate remedy to approach the Educational Tribunal for settling the dispute. The petitioner was aggrieved by non-provincialisation of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":109771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/28\/costs-imposed-for-trying-to-misuse-writ-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":268478,"position":3},"title":"Costs imposed for trying to misuse writ jurisdiction","author":"Saba","date":"February 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0A petitioner approached the High Court under its writ jurisdiction, when the petition was earlier filed before the learned Single Bench in 2016 and the petition was withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to the remedy available under the Family Disputes Redressal System or the Criminal Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":41211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/02\/high-courts-cannot-entertain-any-writ-petition-challenging-the-order-of-the-debts-recovery-tribunal-unless-any-exceptional-circumstances-arise\/","url_meta":{"origin":268478,"position":4},"title":"High Courts cannot entertain any writ petition challenging the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal unless any exceptional circumstances arise","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding the present petition wherein the issue was that whether a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) while disposing an appeal filed under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, is maintainable, especially when Section 18 of the 2002 Act\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/20\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-due-to-having-an-alternative-and-efficacious-remedy-under-s-17-of-the-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":268478,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Editor","date":"May 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. dismissed the writ petition in view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioners under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.\u00a0 The instant writ petition was filed by the borrowers for quashing the order dated 15-03-2022 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268478\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}