{"id":268174,"date":"2022-06-09T15:00:59","date_gmt":"2022-06-09T09:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=268174"},"modified":"2022-07-08T15:44:43","modified_gmt":"2022-07-08T10:14:43","slug":"nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Shreesha Merla (Technical member) and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) has held that non-payment of TDS by the Corporate Debtor is not a default and an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be admitted over the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><strong>Factual Background:<\/strong> <\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present Appeal was preferred by a ex director of the CD against the order of the Adjudicating Authority which admitted a Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor (OC).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts leading up to the Section 9 application were as such. The OC had preferred a Section 9 application, however the parties agreed to enter into a settlement. The Adjudicating Authority passed an order to the effect, that the application could be revived in the event of settlements talks failing.\u00a0 Subsequently, the CD and OC entered into certain settlements. The settlement explicitly conveyed that the amounts were inclusive of the TDS amount.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Subsequent to settlement amounts being paid by the CD, the OC prayed before the Adjudicating Authority revival of the Section 9 Application and the Adjudicating Authority passed an order asking the CD to indicate the details of the payment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Consequently, via a supplementary affidavit the appellants conveyed the Adjudicating Authority that certain TDS amounts remained outstanding. Post this, the Adjudicating Authority admitted the Section 9 application and it is this order that the appeal has been preferred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><u><strong>Observations and Decision:<\/strong> <\/u><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal observed that there was no event or scope of settlement talks between parties failing and thus the Adjudicating Authority could not have intervened and made an order approving the revival.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The only outstanding amount payable were the two TDS amounts. It was held that non-payment of the TDS amount by the CD was no occasion for admitting Section 9 application by the Adjudicating Authority. \u00a0The appropriate authority for taking action against non-payment of TDS is provided under Income Tax Act, 1961 and is in the domain of income tax authorities. Therefore, the approval of Section 9 application was termed to be unsustainable and set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the tribunal clarified that the provisions of the IBC could not be used for giving effect to the recovery of TDS amounts. Appeal was allowed with a cost of Rupees One Lakh on the OC for misusing the process under IBC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[<em>Amitabh Roy<\/em> v <em>Master Development Management (India) Pvt. Ltd<\/em>., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Tg92G5Do\">2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 240<\/a>, decided on 18-5-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocates appearing before NCLAT:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For appellants:\u00a0Mr Anand Sukumar, Mr Mainak Bose and Mr Bhupesh Kumar Pathak<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">for Respondent:\u00a0Mr Ankur Rai<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Shreesha Merla (Technical member) and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) has held that non-payment of TDS <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":262229,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[4381,22064,22014,3031,3587,30426],"class_list":["post-268174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-default","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-nclat","tag-Non_payment","tag-settlement","tag-tds"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Shreesha Merla (Technical member) and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) has held that non-payment of TDS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-09T09:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-08T10:14:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-09T09:30:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-08T10:14:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP","og_description":"A coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Shreesha Merla (Technical member) and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) has held that non-payment of TDS","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-09T09:30:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-08T10:14:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/","name":"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-09T09:30:59+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-08T10:14:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/09\/nclat-using-provisions-of-ibc-for-revival-of-tds-amounts-is-a-misuse-of-ibc-nclat-holds-defaults-over-non-payment-of-tds-is-not-a-ground-for-initiation-of-cirp\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT| Using provisions of IBC for revival of TDS amounts is a misuse of IBC; NCLAT holds defaults over non-payment of TDS is not a ground for initiation of CIRP"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/application-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-section-7-barred-by-limitation-dismissed-nclat-appeal-tds-debt-default-limitation-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":268174,"position":0},"title":"Deduction of TDS itself is not sufficient to conclude the transaction: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While dismissing the appeal challenging the order of Adjudicating Authority which dismissed a S. 7 IBC application on the ground of want of limitation, the Tribunal held that there is no question of going into the merits of the case and the application is barred by limitation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":282241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/corporate-debtor-respondents-loan-agreement-financial-debt-demand-notice-section7-application-ibc-nclt-admited-appeal-challenging-order-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":268174,"position":1},"title":"Deduction of TDS and deposit in Form 16-A under Section 194-A of Income Tax Act proves the deduction was TDS relating to &#8216;Interest other than interest on securities&#8217;: NCLAT observes","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter an appeal was preferred against the order of NCLT admitting S. 7 IBC application or repayment of financial debt. Upholding the order of the NCLT, the Tribunal held that even if there is no proof of loan agreement other materials on record can prove the financial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":296119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/nclat-application-s-9-ibc-for-implementation-of-arbitral-award-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":268174,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Arbitration Proceedings\u2019 and \u2018IBC Proceedings\u2019 cannot go on together; NCLAT upholds NCLT&#8217;s order rejecting Section 9 application","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that an application preferred under Section 9 of the IBC for implementation of an Arbitral Award is not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/24\/agreement-arbitration-clause-dispute-nclt-section-9-ibc-application-admitted-nclat-no-bar-appeal-dismissed-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":268174,"position":3},"title":"No embargo on Operational Creditor to file application u\/S 9 IBC, even if agreement has an arbitration clause: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The scope and objective of the Code is \u2018Resolution\u2019, and not a \u2018Recovery Mode \/ Forum\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285762,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/scconline-legalroundup-14-rulings-from-tribunals-commissions-regulatory-bodies-february-roundup-2023-shiv-sena-party-symbol-dispute-medical-negligence-compensation-nclat-itat-election-commission-natio\/","url_meta":{"origin":268174,"position":4},"title":"Top 14 Rulings from Tribunals, Commissions, Regulatory Authorities: Shiv Sena Party Symbol Dispute, Income Tax Act, Medical Negligence and more| February 2023 Roundup","author":"Arunima","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundup contains many interesting rulings including the Shiv Sena Party Name and Symbol Dispute, Negligence committed by doctors and Compensation therein, Amendment to Section 178(6) of the Income Tax Act, Initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-574.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/nclat-section7-ibc-application-not-barred-under-section10a\/","url_meta":{"origin":268174,"position":5},"title":"Section 7 IBC application must confine to the defaults committed after Section 10A period: NCLAT","author":"Bharti","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\"When the Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) application is based on default committed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period and the amount claimed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period is well beyond threshold, application cannot be rejected on the ground.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 7 IBC application maintainable for post-Section 10A defaults","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268174"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268174\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/262229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}