{"id":268089,"date":"2022-06-08T12:00:02","date_gmt":"2022-06-08T06:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=268089"},"modified":"2022-06-08T11:43:35","modified_gmt":"2022-06-08T06:13:35","slug":"2022-scc-vol-4-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/","title":{"rendered":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">2022 SCC Volume 4 Part 3, consists a very pertinent decision of the Supreme Court wherein it was held \u00a0that it cannot be said that the Tribunal will have jurisdiction only if the subject property is disputed to be a waqf property and not if it is admitted to be a waqf property as such interpretation will be against the provisions Section 83(1) of Act.Read the detailed Judgemnt here:\u00a0 <em>Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari<\/em>, <a style=\"color: #008080;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/06nlEq7q\">(2022) 4 SCC 414<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Short Notes: 3<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 5: <\/strong>Award on issues\/matters beyond the scope of the arbitration clause which was invoked, as the issues\/matters in question pertained to another distinct agreement, arbitration clause in which latter agreement was not invoked, is not valid. Award on lease rental and lease duration i.e pertaining to lease agreement is not permissible, when arbitration has been invoked under dealership agreement. [Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. v. Shree Ganesh Petroleum, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1Vn2Khh0\">(2022) 4 SCC 463<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 \u2014 Ss. 39, 16, 49(2) and 59 \u2014 Circular No. 26\/26\/2017-GST dt. 29-12-2017:<\/strong> Rectification of return, on the premise of Form GSTR-2A being non-operational at the relevant time is not permissible. [Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wVRFbWIg\">(2022) 4 SCC 328<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 S. 482 \u2014 Prayer for directions for conduct of impartial investigation:<\/strong> Interim order(s) cannot be passed by High Court, particularly without hearing the affected part(ies). [OLX India B.V. v. State of Haryana, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/z4E4UL57\">(2022) 4 SCC 390<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Evidence Act, 1872 \u2014 Ss. 65-A and 65-B:<\/strong> Copies of electronic evidence are sufficient when duly certified as per S. 65-B. The fact that original electronic evidence was one of the exhibits of the evidence on record, but not played in court, and only the certified copies thereof were played in court, is of no effect. [Taqdir v. State of Haryana, (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Jl09kIVL\">2022) 4 SCC 321<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Government Contracts and Tenders \u2014 Formation of Government Contract \u2014 Enlistment\/Blacklisting\/Downgrading of Contractor\/Tenderer \u2014 Blacklisting\/Debarment:<\/strong> Period of blacklisting, further held, has to be proportionate to nature of offence(s) committed by erring contractor. Tentative decision to blacklist erring suppliers\/contractors taken after assessing available materials prior to issuance of show-cause notice cannot be treated as pre-determined decision. Order of blacklisting passed after providing opportunity of hearing thereafter, held, cannot be called as violating principles of natural justice. [State of Odisha v. Panda Infraproject Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/vP33P8mr\">(2022) 4 SCC 393<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Dismissal\/Discharge \u2014 Grounds for dismissal\/discharge \u2014 Dismissal \u2014 Proportionality: <\/strong>As allegations of fraud committed by employee concerned on employer Bank were fully established, superannuation of employee concerned in the meantime is not relevant. [United Bank of India v. Bachan Prasad Lall, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/deuIyilH\">(2022) 4 SCC 358<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Penalty\/Punishment \u2014 Proportionality\/Quantum of punishment:<\/strong> Substitution of punishment of removal with compulsory retirement, when warranted, explained. [Umesh Kumar Pahwa v. Uttarakhand Gramin Bank, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2Ozbpu78\">(2022) 4 SCC 385<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Pension \u2014 Entitlement to pension \u2014 Vested\/accrued rights \u2014 Divesting of vested\/accrued rights with retrospective effect \u2014 Permissibility:<\/strong> Amendment having retrospective operation divesting employee of benefit already granted to him under existing Rules, violative of Arts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution. Employees who had opted for Pension Scheme had vested\/accrued rights and any amendment to contrary made with retrospective effect taking away vested right accrued to employee under existing Rules was impermissible. Further held, non-availability of financial resources cannot be justification to take away vested right accrued to employees and that too which was for their socio-economic security. Pension is not a bounty and it is the duty of appellant to make funds available to protect vested rights of employees accrued in their favour. Punjab State Coop. [Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. v. Coop. Societies, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QfD32G47\">(2022) 4 SCC 363<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Pension \u2014 Qualifying period\/service \u2014 Parity:<\/strong> Though it is settled law that the Rules applicable in matters of determination of pension are those which are in force at the time of retirement, but, held, that does not mean that employer can depart from this principle arbitrarily and confer benefit of Rules in force at the time of appointment, for computation of pension upon one employee and deny the same benefit to another employee who is similarly situated. [G. Sadasivan Nair v. Cochin University of Science &amp; Technology, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oKKx6S69\">(2022) 4 SCC 404<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Wakf Act, 1995 \u2014 Ss. 85 and 83 (as amended by Amendment Act 27 of 2013) and Ss. 86 to 90, 93, 94(1), 4 to 7, 51 and 52 \u2014 Wakf Tribunal \u2014 Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal: <\/strong>Proper forum for suit for permanent injunction in respect of wakf property, and power to issue temporary injunctions and whether subject property is disputed to be wakf property, or, admitted to be wakf property, is Wakf Tribunal and not civil court. However, examination of remedies under the Wakf Act, 1995 indicates that jurisdiction of civil court is not totally excluded. The 1995 Act makes a specific reference to court\/civil court also in certain places. Ss. 86, 90 and 93 make specific reference to \u201ccourt\u201d. S. 68(6) goes a step further by making a reference to \u201ccivil court\u201d. Thus, on a cumulative reading of various provisions of the 1995 Act, held, bar of jurisdiction of civil court under the 1995 Act is not total and omnipotent and that there may be cases which may still be entertained by civil courts. Further held, question of bar of jurisdiction of the civil court, has been left for judicial determination. [Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/06nlEq7q\">(2022) 4 SCC 414<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2022 SCC Volume 4 Part 3, consists a very pertinent decision of the Supreme Court wherein it was held \u00a0that it cannot <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":267145,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[49655,26884,29785,42768,11411],"class_list":["post-268089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-2022-scc-vol-4-part-3","tag-cases-reported","tag-law","tag-legal-updates","tag-supreme-court-cases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-08T06:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/\",\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-08T06:30:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"SCC Part\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3 | SCC Times","description":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3","og_description":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-08T06:30:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/","name":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-08T06:30:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"SCC Part"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/16\/2022-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":268089,"position":0},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11, 7, 2(1)(h), 16 and 45 \u2014 Non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement: Arbitration against, or by non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement, when may be invoked, discussed. The scope, ambit and validity of Group of Companies doctrine, explained. Doubting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-1-scc-supreme-court-cases-cases-reported\/","url_meta":{"origin":268089,"position":1},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2022 SCC Volume 4 Part 1, read a very interesting case, wherein the grievance of the builder was that out of total of 1134 apartments constructed and sold by them, the owners of merely 51 apartments have joined together and invoked the jurisdiction of the National Consumer Commission and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/14\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":268089,"position":2},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11 and 7: Non-payment or deficient payment of stamp duty on substantive contract comprising\/containing arbitration clause, or on standalone arbitration agreement, in cases where payment of stamp duty is mandatory, renders such arbitration agreement as non-existent pending payment of (the balance) stamp\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2023 scc vol. 7 part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/29\/supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996-section-116-scope-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":268089,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Three types of issues that can be considered in an application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"November 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by Telangana High Court, wherein the High Court dismissed the application filed by the appellant under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (\u2018Act of 1996\u2019), the division bench of B.R Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna*, JJ. held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":273401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/10\/arbitration-agreement-language-final-binding-arbitral-award-intention-valid-supreme-court-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":268089,"position":4},"title":"Arbitration clause, even without the words \u201cfinal and binding\u201d, valid if the intention of the parties, to abide by arbitrator&#8217;s decision, is clear: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"When Section 7 or any other provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 do not stipulate any particular form or requirements, it would not be appropriate for a court to gratuitously add impediments and desist from upholding the validity of an arbitration agreement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289846,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/17\/2023-scc-vol-3-part-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":268089,"position":5},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 20, 2(1)(e) and 42 \u2014 Jurisdiction of Court: Determination of jurisdiction of Court, based on juridical seat of arbitration, explained. Principles reiterated regarding availability of power of parties to: (1) select, and (2) modify the juridical seat of arbitration, by mutual agreement and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2023 scc vol. 3 part 5","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/2023-scc-vol.-3-part-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/2023-scc-vol.-3-part-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/2023-scc-vol.-3-part-5.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/2023-scc-vol.-3-part-5.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268089"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268089\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/267145"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}