{"id":267899,"date":"2022-06-03T16:00:33","date_gmt":"2022-06-03T10:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267899"},"modified":"2022-06-03T14:24:22","modified_gmt":"2022-06-03T08:54:22","slug":"even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/","title":{"rendered":"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and J M Khazi, JJ. dismissed the appeal and quashed the impugned judgment directing the appellants to determine the compensation and pay the same to respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are such that the original respondent 1 viz., Narayana Reddy, owner of an agricultural land, wherein the said land, as well as several other lands, were required for formation of a layout between Banaswadi Road and Hennur Road commonly known as HRBR Layout. A preliminary notification dated 21-03-1977 and a final notification dated 14-05-1980 was issued. The father of original petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to give effect to the resolution for de notification of the land which was thereby dismissed. Then, again a writ petition was filed challenging the validity of the notifications which was again dismissed. The original petitioner again filed a petition challenging the notifications without disclosing the factum of filing two previous writ petitions by the father. The impugned notifications were quashed and the writ petition was allowed holding that the petition does not suffer from delay and laches as the scheme was not substantially implemented as required under Section 27 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 within five years from the date of the final notification and therefore, the scheme has lapsed. Thus, instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the appellant submitted that the original petitioner was guilty of suppression of facts and the writ petition filed by the original petitioner suffered from delay and laches and the writ petition was barred by res judicata. It was also contended that the original petitioner cannot claim any benefit on the principle of negative equality and no legal right accrues to the original petitioner even if in some cases in which adverse orders have been passed against the appellants, it may not have preferred an appeal. However, it is fairly submitted that the land owners are entitled to just and fair compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on judgment <em>Krishnamurthy v. Bangalore Development Authority, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L8I0HYFc\">1995 SCC OnLine Kar 498<\/a> wherein it was observed <em>\u201cIt is also pertinent to note that proceeding under Section 27 of the Act would lapse only if two conditions are satisfied viz., failure to execute the scheme by dereliction of statutory duties without justification and substantial execution of the scheme depending upon the scheme.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that it is trite law that <strong>principles of constructive res judicata and res judicata apply to writ proceeding<\/strong>. <strong>In the instant case, the original petitioner who claims title in respect of property in question through his father is bound by the decision of previous writ petition and cannot be permitted to agitate the validity of the impugned notifications again on the principle of res judicata<\/strong> Thus, the challenge to the aforesaid notification is barred by principles of res judicata.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further relied on judgment <em>K. Jayaram v. Bangalore Development Authority<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3u6o03RB\">2021 SCC Online SC 1194<\/a> and observed that the petitioner is guilty of suppression of material facts and has not approached the court with clean hands. Therefore, the discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which is equitable and extraordinary cannot be exercised in favour of the original petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on <em>Chandigarh Administration v. Jagjit Singh<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pglfafpn\">(1995) 1 SCC 745<\/a>, and opined that even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right on the original petitioner to claim similar relief. Therefore, even if some land owners may have been granted the benefit, inadvertently by the authority, the same would not confer any legal right on the original petitioner to claim the similar benefit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court directed that the <em>\u201cappellants shall take steps within a period of six weeks to determine the compensation payable to respondents 1(a) to 1(d) and shall make payment of the amount of compensation as is permissible in law.\u201d <\/em>[Bangalore Development Authority v. Principal Secretary, Revenue Department W.A. \u00a0No. 4121 \u00a0of \u00a02017, decided on 24-05-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appearances-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For appellants- Mr Gurudas S Kannur and Gouthamdev C. Ullal<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For respondents- Mr Rajashekar and S. Suresh Desai<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and J M Khazi, JJ. dismissed the appeal and quashed the impugned judgment <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":265017,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31812,48417,2728,42067,30456,5353],"class_list":["post-267899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-agricultural-land","tag-bangalore-development-authority","tag-compensation","tag-delay-and-laches","tag-land","tag-res-judicata"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-03T10:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/\",\"name\":\"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-03T10:30:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief | SCC Times","description":"Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief","og_description":"Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-03T10:30:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/","name":"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-03T10:30:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/even-if-some-similarly-situated-persons-have-been-granted-benefit-inadvertently-or-by-mistake\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Res-Judicata] Kar HC | Even if some similarly situated persons have been granted benefit inadvertently or by mistake, the same does not confer any legal right to claim similar relief"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/all-hc-order-dismissing-first-writ-petition-operates-as-res-judicata-second-petition-on-same-facts-not-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":267899,"position":0},"title":"All HC | Order dismissing first writ petition operates as res judicata; second petition on same facts not allowed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This writ petition was filed before a Divison Bench of Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., for issuance of direction to respondent to consider the claim of petitioners for providing compensation in lieu of acquisition of plot situated in Village Pratap Patti District Varanasi\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/no-appeal-preferred-against-an-action-wrongly-decided-renders-the-matter-with-same-cause-of-action-as-res-judicata\/","url_meta":{"origin":267899,"position":1},"title":"SL CA | No appeal preferred against an action wrongly decided renders the matter with same cause of action as res judicata","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Sri Lanka Court of Appeal: This appeal was filed before a 2-Judge Bench comprising of A.H.M.D. Nawaz and E.A.G.R. Amarasekara, JJ. Facts of the case were such that District Judge dismissed the plaintiff\u2019s action on the premise that the plaintiff\u2019s action was barred by the law of res judicata. Plaintiff\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330883,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/17\/2024-scc-vol-7-part-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":267899,"position":2},"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 141 and 142 \u2014 What is binding \u2014 \u201cLaw declared by Supreme Court\u201d \u2014 Doctrine of merger","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 SCC Vol. 7 Part 3","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-7-Part-3.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233863,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/all-hc-whether-principle-of-res-judicata-in-a-subsequent-claim-would-apply-on-an-issue-of-fact-which-in-the-former-proceedings-was-decided-by-a-forum-of-competent-jurisdiction-between-the-same-parti\/","url_meta":{"origin":267899,"position":3},"title":"All HC | Whether principle of res judicata in a subsequent claim would apply on an issue of fact which in the former proceedings was decided by a forum of competent jurisdiction between same parties; MACT award modified  \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Attau Rahman Masoodi, J., allowed the appeal and modified the impugned order by applying the principle of res judicata. The factual matrix of the case is such that the present appeal has arisen out of the judgment and award dated 16-02-2016 delivered by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208022,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/14\/tripura-hc-res-judicata-applicable-where-suit-subject-is-identical-even-if-subsequent-suit-filed-by-different-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":267899,"position":4},"title":"Tripura HC| Res Judicata applicable where suit subject is identical even if subsequent suit filed by different party","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and Arindam Lodh, J. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment rendered by trial court dismissing a civil suit. The trial court dismissed the suit on grounds of\u00a0res\u00a0judicata.\u00a0It was found that the issue of declaration of title over the suit land\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/16\/manipur-hc-mere-dismissal-of-earlier-suit-which-was-not-decided-on-merits-would-not-attract-res-judicata\/","url_meta":{"origin":267899,"position":5},"title":"Manipur HC | Mere dismissal of earlier suit which\u00a0was not decided on merits would not attract &#8216;res judicata&#8217;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: Kh. Nobin Singh, J. allowed civil revision petition questioning the validity and correctness of the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Imphal East. In the present case, a suit was instituted by the petitioner in a land dispute, without the originals of the documents being\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267899\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/265017"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}