{"id":267828,"date":"2022-06-03T12:02:54","date_gmt":"2022-06-03T06:32:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267828"},"modified":"2022-06-10T12:26:26","modified_gmt":"2022-06-10T06:56:26","slug":"pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:<\/strong> In a case where the bench of <strong>MR Shah*<\/strong> and BV Nagarathna, JJ was posed with the question as to whether on re\u00ademployment in the government service, an employee who was serving in the Indian\u00a0Army\/in\u00a0the\u00a0Armed\u00a0Forces\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0entitled\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0pay scales\u00a0at\u00a0par\u00a0with\u00a0his\u00a0last\u00a0drawn\u00a0pay, it has been held that a claim for the last drawn pay in the armed forces is not a matter of right.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The issue revolved around the interpretation of Para 8 of the Central Civil Services (Fixation of Pay of Re\u00ademployed Pensioners) Order, 1986 [CCS Order]. The Court observed that as per the said provision, Emergency Commissioned Officer and a Short Service Commissioned Officer working in the Armed Forces on his employment to a civil post shall be entitled to advance increments equal to the completed years of service rendered in the Armed Forces on a basic pay equal to or higher than the minimum of the scale attached to the civil post in which they are employed. However, the pay arrived at should not exceed the basic pay last drawn by them in the Armed Forces.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, Para 8 of the CCS Order makes a reference to two rates of pay in case of emergency commissioned officers and short service commissioned officers being appointed in the government service:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">First, they may be granted advance increment equal to the completed years of service rendered by them in the armed forces on a basic pay equal to or higher than the minimum of the scale attached to the civil posts in which they are employed. The pay is to be fixed with reference to the scale attached to the civil posts in which they are employed;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Second, while computing the pay in the aforesaid manner it should not exceed the basic pay last drawn by them in the armed forces. In another words, while computing the pay of the said officers who joined the civil posts their pay cannot exceed last drawn pay by them in the armed forces. In case it exceeds then it is capped to the last drawn pay in the armed forces.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also explained that Para 8 of the CCS Order does not indicate that the pay last drawn by the re-employed person in the armed forces should be the pay to be computed when he joined the civil post. <strong><em>There is no entitlement of pay protection under para 8 of the CCS<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cThe manner of computation of pay as envisaged under para 8 also clearly stipulates that the pay so arrived at should not exceed the basic pay (including the deferred pay but excluding other emoluments) last drawn by the respondent in the armed force. That does not mean that the respondent is entitled to a pay equal to what was last drawn by him in the armed force.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court made clear that the reference to the last drawn pay in the armed forces is only to ensure that the pay computed in the civil post in the manner envisaged in para 8 of CCS Order does not exceed the basic pay (including the deferred pay but excluding other emoluments) last drawn by the personnel in the armed forces. For example, if the minimum of the scale attached to the civil post is higher than the last drawn pay of the personnel in the armed force and while computing the pay for the civil post as envisaged under para 8 of CCS if it so exceeds then possibly the last drawn pay in the armed forces could be paid. The said Rule prescribes fixation of a pay exceeding the basic pay (including the deferred pay but excluding other emoluments) last drawn by the personnel in the armed forces in respect of the civil post to which an exarmed force personnel is appointed. Thus, in a case where computation of pay exceeds last drawn pay in the armed forces then, in such a situation possibly the last drawn pay of such a personnel can be fixed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Union of India v. Anil Prasad, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6161bkbF\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine SC 665<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20.05.2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">*Judgment by: Justice MR Shah<\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsels<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For UOI: ASG Aishwarya\u00a0Bhati<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondent: Senior Advocate Vinay Kumar\u00a0Garg<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In a case where the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ was posed with the question as to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":267890,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[12331,49624,49625,49623,35065,49622,49620,49621,5941],"class_list":["post-267828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-armed-forces","tag-central-civil-services","tag-central-civil-services-fixation-of-pay-of-reemployed-pensioners-order","tag-civil-service","tag-government-service","tag-last-drawn-pay","tag-pay-parity","tag-reemployment","tag-service-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In a case where the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ was posed with the question as to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-03T06:32:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-10T06:56:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/\",\"name\":\"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-03T06:32:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-10T06:56:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court","og_description":"Supreme Court: In a case where the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ was posed with the question as to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-03T06:32:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-10T06:56:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/","name":"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-03T06:32:54+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-10T06:56:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/03\/pay-parity-last-drawn-pay-reemployment-government-service-armed-forces-civil-service-not-right-supreme-court-judgments-legal-updates-research-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pay on a par with last drawn pay on reemployment in Government Service? Not a matter of right, holds Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-193.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":225289,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/07\/second-national-judicial-pay-commission-submits-its-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":267828,"position":0},"title":"Second National Judicial Pay Commission submits its Report","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The Second National Judicial Pay Commission has filed the main part of the Report in 4 volumes covering the subject of Pay, Pension and Allowances, in the Registry of the Supreme Court on 29.01.2020. The Commission has been constituted pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court in All India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353699,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/sc-stays-pay-minus-pension-rule-aiims-jodhpur\/","url_meta":{"origin":267828,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court stays \u2018pay minus pension\u2019 rule for ex-defence faculty recruited by AIIMS Jodhpur","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Pay Minus Pension is a salary fixation method applied to retired government employees who are re-employed or appointed to new government positions after retirement. Under this rule, the employee\u2019s monthly salary is adjusted by deducting the amount of pension they receive from their gross pay in the new job. Essentially,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SC Stays 'Pay Minus Pension' Rule","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/SC-Stays-Pay-Minus-Pension-Rule.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/SC-Stays-Pay-Minus-Pension-Rule.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/SC-Stays-Pay-Minus-Pension-Rule.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/SC-Stays-Pay-Minus-Pension-Rule.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":124581,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/13\/union-of-india-asked-to-deliberate-upon-the-issue-of-non-grant-of-equal-pay-for-equal-work-to-armed-personnel\/","url_meta":{"origin":267828,"position":2},"title":"Union of India asked to deliberate upon the issue of non-grant of equal pay for equal work to Armed Personnel","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that the Court would fail in it\u2019s duty if it did not took note of the grievance of the BSF, CRPF, CISF, ITBP, RPF and SSB who are grieved by non-grant of equal pay for equal work, that is, benefit that has been granted to the organized\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/24\/government-amends-rule-54-of-central-civil-services-pension-rules-1972\/","url_meta":{"origin":267828,"position":3},"title":"Government amends Rule 54 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"On the death of a Government servant while in service, the family is entitled to a family pension in accordance with Rule 54 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The family pension was payable at an enhanced rate of 50% of the pay last drawn for a period\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269406,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/04\/supreme-court-june-2022-roundup-clean-chit-to-pm-modi-maharashtra-political-crisis-psychological-evaluation-of-death-row-convicts-and-more\/","url_meta":{"origin":267828,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court June 2022 Roundup| Clean chit to PM Modi; Maharashtra Political Crisis; Psychological Evaluation of Death Row Convicts; and more","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Top Stories of the Month Clean Chit to PM Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots case \u201cSIT Officials have come out with flying colours unscathed despite all odds\u201d; SC upholds SIT's clean chit to PM Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots \u201cThe protagonists of quest for justice sitting in a comfortable environment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court June 2022 Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209551,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/06\/capfs-being-in-organized-group-a-services-entitled-to-non-functional-financial-upgradation\/","url_meta":{"origin":267828,"position":5},"title":"CAPFs being in Organized Group \u201cA\u201d Services entitled to Non-Functional Financial Upgradation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a huge relief to Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), the bench of RF Nariman and MR Shah, JJ has upheld the Delhi High Court verdict which had directed the Central Government to grant Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU) to CAPFs who are a part of\u00a0Organized\u00a0Group\u00a0\u201cA\u201d\u00a0Services. On the object\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267828\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/267890"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}