{"id":267723,"date":"2022-06-01T18:00:59","date_gmt":"2022-06-01T12:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267723"},"modified":"2022-06-10T11:44:50","modified_gmt":"2022-06-10T06:14:50","slug":"neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Pushpendra Singh Bhati J. modified the impugned order and enhanced the compensation to Rs 75000\/- (for wife) and Rs 25000\/- (for son).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are such that the marriage was solemnized and a son was born out of the said wedlock. It was further submitted that, on account of the alleged disharmony the wife left her matrimonial home and came back to India along with the son. Thus, the wife filed an application against the husband under Section 125 CrPC before the Court, which was allowed vide the impugned order, while awarding the monthly maintenance to the wife and the son . The petitioner-husband (respondent herein) preferred the petition against the order seeking quashing and setting aside of the said order. The petitioner-wife (respondent herein) preferred instant revision petition challenging the order praying for enhancement of monthly maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was submitted that the wife is earning Rs 85, 000\/- per month and staying at Hyderabad, and thus, competent to earn her own livelihood, while the husband does not oppose the maintenance granted to the son vide the impugned order. Counsel also submitted that the wife deserted the husband of her own sweet and free will, and thus, she is not entitled to any kind of maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on Supreme Court judgment in <em>Rajnesh v. Neha<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ujyg83Pj\">(2021) 2 SCC 324<\/a>, even if the wife is earning, then also she is entitled to the determination of maintenance, in accordance with the lifestyle of her husband in the matrimonial home.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was submitted that the sustenance does not mean and cannot be allowed to mean a mere survival, and the lifestyle at Hyderabad, where the wife alongwith her son is presently residing, is very costly, and the son is also going in a good and reputed school at Hyderabad, the expenditure whereof is also too high. Thus, even if the wife is earning something, then also she is entitled to claim the necessary and adequate maintenance from her husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted that the husband himself took divorce; therefore, the charge of desertion cannot become a ground so as to enable the husband to disqualify the wife from claiming the amount of monthly maintenance, in any manner whatsoever.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This Court finds that the husband is earning about Rs.12,00,000\/- per month and the wife is earning Rs.85,000\/- per month, and therefore, a very reasonable capacity of the husband to pay the maintenance should be 1\/12th of his income, which shall take care of the husband\u2019s claim for the high cost of living in the USA.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court thus held <em>\u201cthe amount of monthly maintenance as awarded by the learned court below, vide the impugned order dated 30.08.2018, to the wife and the son, is enhanced to Rs.75000\/- (for wife) and Rs. 25000\/- (for son).\u201d<\/em>[Neha Mathur v. Arvind Kishore, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9F1m6o7f\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Raj 943<\/b><\/a>, decided on 26-05-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Appearances<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Petitioner(s): Mr Parvej Moyal (for wife)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondent(s): Mr Shadan Farasat a\/w Mr Harshit Bhurani (for husband)<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati J. modified the impugned order and enhanced the compensation to Rs 75000\/- (for wife) and Rs <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49600,49599,2641,2549,12531,2642],"class_list":["post-267723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-earning-wife","tag-enhancement","tag-husband","tag-maintenance","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-wife"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-01T12:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-10T06:14:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-01T12:30:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-10T06:14:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance | SCC Times","description":"Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance","og_description":"Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-01T12:30:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-10T06:14:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/","name":"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-06-01T12:30:59+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-10T06:14:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/neither-the-mere-potential-to-earn-nor-actual-earning-of-wife-howsoever-meagre-is-sufficient-to-deny-claim-of-maintenance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Neither the mere potential to earn, nor actual earning of wife, howsoever meagre, is sufficient to deny claim of maintenance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246092,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/25\/maintenance-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":267723,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | It is for the wife to establish alleged source of husband&#8217;s income; Husband would have paid maintenance rather than going jail: HC reduces interim maintenance to wife and son","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., partly allowed a revision petition filed by the husband and reduced the amount of interim maintenance granted to the respondent-wife and son from Rs 12,500 per month to Rs 4,500 per month. While so deciding, the Court held that: \"It is trite law that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/07\/mp-hc-husband-is-liable-to-maintain-his-wife-rs-3000-pm-maintenance-is-not-on-the-higher-side\/","url_meta":{"origin":267723,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Husband is liable to maintain his wife; Rs 3000 pm maintenance is not on the higher side","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. dismissed the revision petition and directed the applicant to pay Rs 3000 as maintenance to the respondents. In the pertinent case, the applicant filed the present revision being aggrieved by the order passed by Family Court, Dhar whereby maintenance of Rs 3000 per\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/mumbai-court-sets-aside-order-maintenance-wife-earning-90-lakhs-husband-earning-3-lakhs\/","url_meta":{"origin":267723,"position":2},"title":"Wife earned 90 lakhs, husband employed in her firm earned 3.5 lakhs; Mumbai Court sets aside order granting maintenance to wife","author":"Ridhi","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pin-pointed the huge difference in income of the husband and wife, and that there was no documentary evidence to support the wife's claims of being indebted.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"greater bombay sessions court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/greater-bombay-sessions-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/greater-bombay-sessions-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/greater-bombay-sessions-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/greater-bombay-sessions-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/08\/261308\/","url_meta":{"origin":267723,"position":3},"title":"Tri HC \u2502Whether maintenance granted to the wife under S. 125 CrPC can be cancelled in view of husband\u2019s obtaining a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and wife\u2019s refusal for the same?","author":"Editor","date":"February 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., decided on a petition which was filed by the petitioner challenging order passed by the Additional Judge, Family Court which stated that the petitioner was not entitled to any maintenance allowance under section 125 Cr.P.C from her husband in view of her refusal to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/12\/del-hc-capable-of-earning-different-from-actual-earning-capacity-to-earn-is-no-ground-to-reduce-maintenance-awarded-to-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":267723,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;Capable of earning&#8221; different from &#8220;actual earning&#8221;; Capacity to earn is no ground to reduce maintenance awarded to wife","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the Family Court whereby the petitioner-husband was directed to pay interim maintenance of Rs 33,005 per month to the respondent-wife and their minor child. The above order was made by the Magistrate while deciding the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/09\/gau-hc-husband-bound-to-maintain-wife-and-child-under-s-125-crpc-in-absence-of-specific-evidence-as-to-the-income-of-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":267723,"position":5},"title":"Gau HC | Husband bound to maintain wife and child under S. 125 CrPC in absence of specific evidence as to the income of wife","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the family court whereby the petitioner was directed to pay a monthly sum of Rs 2000 each to his wife and child towards their maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The wife had left petitioner's home\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267723\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}