{"id":267705,"date":"2022-06-01T15:00:09","date_gmt":"2022-06-01T09:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267705"},"modified":"2022-06-10T11:41:59","modified_gmt":"2022-06-10T06:11:59","slug":"if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/","title":{"rendered":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&#038;C Act? Del HC examines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:<\/strong> While addressing the ineligibility of an arbitrator to be appointed, Vibhu Bhakru, J., elaborated on the expression \u2018close family member\u2019 and the likelihood of bias.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, the petitioner had filed a petition under Sections 14(2) and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, <em>inter alia<\/em>, praying that the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator be terminated, and an independent arbitrator be appointed in his place.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The claim of the petitioner was that the Arbitrator was ineligible to act as an arbitrator by virtue of Section 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act and he was related to the parties, and they have not entered into any agreement waiving their right to waive the ineligibility, in terms of the proviso to Section 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Law<\/span><\/h4>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">\u201cIt is well settled that Sections 12 and 13 of the A&amp;C Act provide for the mechanism regarding challenge to the appointment of an arbitrator. A party challenging the appointment of an arbitrator would necessarily have to confine itself to that scheme.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the Delhi High Court decision of <em>HRD Corpn. (Marcus Oil and Chemical Division) v. Gail (India) Ltd., <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/44992m50\"><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">2017 SCC OnLine Del 8034<\/span><\/a>, it was held that a person, who is ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator, would <em>ipso jure <\/em>not have the mandate to perform such functions. He would lack the inherent jurisdiction to act as an arbitrator. In such a case, it was not necessary for the party challenging the appointment to follow the procedure under Section 13 of the A&amp;C Act; it was open to seek recourse to Section 14 of the A&amp;C Act.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the petitioner\u2019s application before the arbitrator, it was unequivocally stated that he had not cast any aspersion on the integrity or the character of the arbitrator. The recusal of the petitioner was sought solely on the ground that he was ineligible to act as an arbitrator and to ensure that neither party, at a future stage, could raise a challenge on the said ground.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Question for Consideration<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the arbitrator under Section 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act and if so, whether the petitioner has waived his right to object to such ineligibility?<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Entries nos. 1 to 9 of the Seventh Schedule of the A&amp;C Act relates to an arbitrator\u2019s relations with the parties or the counsel. Entry No. 9 \u2013 which is central to the controversy in this petition \u2013 reads as under:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cTHE SEVENTH SCHEDULE Arbitrator\u2019s relationship with the parties or counsel<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*** *** ***<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\" start=\"9\">\n<li>\n<blockquote><p>The arbitrator has a close family relationship with one of the parties and in the case of companies with the persons in the management and controlling the company.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted from the above that, it is not sufficient that the arbitrator is related to any one of the parties; the relationship must be a \u2018family relationship\u2019 and, that too, a close one. If an arbitrator has a close family relationship with one of the parties, it is likely to raise a doubt as to his independence and impartiality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the High Court expressed that, where there is a likelihood of bias, such as where a family member of an arbitrator has a significant financial interest, the same is applicable only if the family member is a <em>\u201cspouse, sibling, child, parent or life partner\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The above indicated that, the relationship between the arbitrator and the parties can be described as a close family relationship solely on the basis that the arbitrator\u2019s son is married to their niece.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that, the plain language of Entry no. 9 indicates that it is not the legislative intent to render a distant relative of the parties to be ineligible for being appointed as an arbitrator if both the parties so agree.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, in the present case, the family relationship between the arbitrator and the parties cannot be described as a close family relationship.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">\u201cClose family relationship of A with B and B with C does not necessarily mean that A and C have a close family relationship. This is clear if one considers that first cousins from the maternal side and first cousins from the paternal side can hardly be considered to have any family relationship.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lastly, it was noted that the respondent insisted on continuing with the arbitration before the Arbitrator, notwithstanding that neither Sudhir Singhal nor the Company was parties to the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court found that the petition was unmerited and was accordingly dismissed. [Himanshu Shekhar v. Prabhat Shekhar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/876AN3JM\"><b><span id=\"Highlight_0000\" class=\"Highlight\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 1651<\/span><\/b><\/a>, decided on 31-5-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Petitioner: Mr P. Nagesh, Senior Advocate with Mr Rajeev Ahuja and Mr Akshay Sharma, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondent: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr Ravi Prakash and Mr Atif Samim, Advocates.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: While addressing the ineligibility of an arbitrator to be appointed, Vibhu Bhakru, J., elaborated on the expression \u2018close family <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":267713,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3226,17711,49595,2543,29785,42834,42768,49596],"class_list":["post-267705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration","tag-arbitrator","tag-close-family-relationship","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-updates","tag-section-125-of-the-ac-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act? Del HC examines | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act? Del HC examines\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&amp;C Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-01T09:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-10T06:11:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/\",\"name\":\"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act? Del HC examines | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-01T09:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-10T06:11:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&#038;C Act? Del HC examines\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act? Del HC examines | SCC Times","description":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act? Del HC examines","og_description":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-06-01T09:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-10T06:11:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/","name":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act? Del HC examines | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg","datePublished":"2022-06-01T09:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-10T06:11:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&C Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/01\/if-arbitrators-son-was-married-to-niece-of-one-of-parties-would-that-be-described-as-a-close-family-relationship-resulting-in-ineligibility-of-arbitrator-by-virtue-of-s-125-of-the-ac-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"If arbitrator\u2019s son was married to niece of one of parties, would that be described as a close family relationship resulting in ineligibility of Arbitrator by virtue of S. 12(5) of the A&#038;C Act? Del HC examines"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/DelArbitrator.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/16\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-arbitral-award-by-arbitrator-de-jure-inability-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":267705,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside arbitral award passed by Arbitrator having de jure inability to pass the award","author":"Arunima","date":"June 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The ineligibility of an Arbitrator goes to the root of his jurisdiction and the Arbitral Award cannot be considered as valid.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/21\/appointment-of-arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":267705,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Can sole arbitrator&#8217;s appointment be disputed if he was consultant\/advisor to one of the parties to dispute? Court examines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: J.R. Midha, J., in view of serious doubts on the independence of sole arbitrator as named in the arbitration agreement, appointed another independent arbitrator. Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Parties had agreed for reference of disputes to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Alternate Dispute Resolution&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Alternate Dispute Resolution","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/alternate_dispute_resolution\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/12\/appointment-of-arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements\/","url_meta":{"origin":267705,"position":2},"title":"Appointment of Arbitrator in Lender-Borrower Agreements","author":"Editor","date":"May 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Mohd. Suboor\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitrator in lender-borrower agreements","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286933,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/unilateral-appointment-of-arbitrator-whether-absolute-prohibition-contrary-to-the-scheme-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":267705,"position":3},"title":"Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator \u2014 Whether Absolute Prohibition Contrary to the Scheme of the Act?","author":"Editor","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Prashant Tripathi\u2020 and Sanjeev Singh\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272655,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/calcutta-high-court-illegal-procedure-for-appointment-of-arbitrator-does-not-render-arbitration-agreement-illegal-in-toto-guiding-principles-for-appointment-of-arbitrator-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":267705,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Illegal procedure for appointment of Arbitrator does not render Arbitration agreement illegal in toto; Guiding Principles for Appointment of Arbitrator reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court: In a petition challenging the appointment of sole Arbitrator by the respondent, Shekhar B. Saraf, J., held that merely because an arbitration clause provides for an illegal method of appointment of arbitrator, it does not come to an end and after removing the illegal portion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/arbitration-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":267705,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Whether disability of an appointing authority to appoint an arbitrator frustrate the arbitration agreement. HC unravels in light of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., while addressing the matter in respect to the invocation of an arbitration clause expressed that: \u201c\u2026the legislative policy is to encourage arbitration, thus, any interpretation that would nullify an arbitration clause must be avoided.\u201d What led to the filing of the present petition? Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267705"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267705\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/267713"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}