{"id":267456,"date":"2022-05-27T14:00:56","date_gmt":"2022-05-27T08:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267456"},"modified":"2022-05-26T18:49:11","modified_gmt":"2022-05-26T13:19:11","slug":"law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights  \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Prasantha De Silva and K.K.A.V. Swarnadhipathi, JJ. dismissed an appeal which was filed against the dismissal of the revision application citing no exceptional circumstances to invoke the revisionary jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The 2nd Party Respondent-Petitioner-Appellants (Appellants) had filed the case within 3 months, as per a settlement. Five years after filing the said action and when it reached the stage of the trial, it was revealed that the subject matter of the action is a co-owned land. Thereafter, the Appellants had withdrawn the case reserving the right to file a fresh action. 1st Party Respondent-Respondent-Respondents (Respondents) filed a motion stating that the 2nd Party Respondent-Petitioner-Appellants have withdrawn the case and hence permit the Respondents to put up the boundary fence in terms of the settlement. Primary Court Judge allowed the application of the Respondents to put up the boundary fence on 09-07-1997.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 16-07-1997, Appellants had filed a motion stating that a partition case has been filed in respect of the land dispute and therefore to vacate the above Order. On 15-09-1997, Magistrate stayed the above order. On 28-05-2003, 2nd Party Respondents moved to withdraw the said case with liberty to file a fresh action and the District Judge allowed the said application. On 14-08-2013, Respondents filed a motion in the Primary Court informing that Respondents have withdrawn the said partition action and therefore to allow the Respondents to put up the boundary fence on the land in dispute as per the terms of the settlement. Accordingly, the learned Primary Court Judge allowed the application. On 15-11-2013 the 2nd Party Respondent-Petitioner- Appellants aggrieved by the order filed an application for revision. The High Court judge dismissed the said application on the basis that the Appellants had not disclosed any exceptional circumstances to invoke the revisionary jurisdiction of the Court. Thus, an instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that Appellants had withdrawn the said partition case on 28-05-2003 with liberty to file a fresh action. The Appellants had not taken any interest in filing a fresh partition action until the Respondent moved the Court to execute the writ, which was after 10 years from the date of withdrawal of the said partition case. Thus, it is imperative to note that the Appellants have not exercised their legal rights over the disputed property and had not acted with due diligence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Thus, according to the maxim \u2018vigilantibus non dormientibus aequitas subvenit\u2019, the Appellants had slept over their rights. The law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while dismissing the appeal held that the High Court Judge has correctly decided that no exceptional circumstances have been established by the Appellants to invoke the revisionary jurisdiction of the High Court.[Abdul Rahman Lebbe Abdul Hakeem v. A. A. Sithy Zulfiya, CA (PHC) 137 of 2017, decided on 17-05-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lal Wijenayake with S. Jayaratne A.A.L for the Petitioner-Appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">N.M Shaheed A.A.L with Piyumi Seneviratne A.A.L for the 1st Respondent- Respondent-Respondent of the 1st Party and Substituted Respondent-Respondent<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant ahs reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Division Bench of Prasantha De Silva and K.K.A.V. Swarnadhipathi, JJ. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[4351,49565],"class_list":["post-267456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-revisional-jurisdiction","tag-vigilantibus-non-dormientibus-aequitas-subvenit"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-27T08:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/\",\"name\":\"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-27T08:30:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0 | SCC Times","description":"Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0","og_description":"Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-27T08:30:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/","name":"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-27T08:30:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/law-helps-the-vigilant-and-not-those-who-sleep-over-their-rights\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL CoA | Law helps the vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights; Appeal dismissed for sleeping over rights \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":165294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/26\/statute-ousting-jurisdiction-civil-court-required-strictly-construed\/","url_meta":{"origin":267456,"position":0},"title":"Any statute ousting the jurisdiction of Civil Court is required to be strictly construed","author":"Saba","date":"October 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. dismissed a Regular Second Appeal holding that in the instant case, jurisdiction of the Civil Courts was ousted by Section 171 of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954; and there was no substantial question of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":172114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/29\/jurisdiction-consumer-forum-not-ousted-even-party-filed-suit-matter-civil-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":267456,"position":1},"title":"Jurisdiction of consumer forum is not ousted even if the other party has filed suit on the same matter in Civil Court","author":"Saba","date":"November 29, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission: The grievance of the petitioner in a recent case before the Commission was that appellants\/complainants had entered into agreements with the respondents for purchase of residential flats, which the respondents were to construct and despite paying the substantial amount to the respondents, the construction of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304157,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/doctrine-of-estoppel-election-inapplicable-section-79-rera-act-ousts-civil-courts-jurisdiction-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":267456,"position":2},"title":"Doctrine of Estoppel by Election inapplicable when Section 79 of the RERA Act clearly ousts civil courts\u2019 jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court opined that there was no contract between the parties due to the lack of a meeting of minds, therefore, the Specific Relief Act, 1963 cannot be invoked.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321597,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/07\/party-not-contacting-counsel-for-6-years-cannot-seek-condonation-of-delay-alleging-that-counsel-did-not-inform-about-disposal-of-case-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":267456,"position":3},"title":"Party not contacting counsel for 6 years, cannot seek condonation of delay alleging that counsel did not inform about disposal of case: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"May 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court noted that while the appellants alleged their counsel failed to inform them about the case's dismissal, there's no evidence they actively sought updates from the counsel during the six-year period.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347697,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":267456,"position":4},"title":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was considering an appeal appeal against an order of the High Court dismissing the suit while considering an application for an injunction.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dismissal of suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/17\/relief-under-s-9-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":267456,"position":5},"title":"Relief under S. 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: Can it be granted to a party who is not party to arbitration agreement? Read Utt HC\u2019s ruling","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Emphasizing on the purpose and object of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Division bench of Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J., held that, A person not a party to an arbitration agreement cannot invoke jurisdiction of the Court for interim\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267456\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}