{"id":267453,"date":"2022-05-27T13:00:25","date_gmt":"2022-05-27T07:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267453"},"modified":"2022-05-26T18:44:04","modified_gmt":"2022-05-26T13:14:04","slug":"appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/","title":{"rendered":"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court:<\/strong> Sandeep N. Bhatt, J. dismissed an appeal preferred by the Insurance Company being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal by which the Tribunal has awarded Rs.65,200\/- with 7.5% interest p.a. from the date of the claim petition.<\/p>\n

The claimant was travelling on a motorcycle as a pillion rider and the same was being driven by present opponent 2 in a rash and negligent manner and at excessive speed. When they reached near the place of the accident, at that point time, one Tempo which was driven by present opponent 4 rashly and negligently and at excessive speed, dashed with the Hero Honda motorcycle. Due to said accident, an original claimant had sustained serious injuries including fracture. Therefore, the claim petition was preferred to get the compensation of Rs.3 lakhs.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal had framed issues for determination and had recorded evidence and consequently granted the abovementioned compensation. Thus, an instant appeal was filed by the Insurance company.<\/p>\n

Advocate appearing for the Insurance Company has submitted that the negligence of the Tempo driver was required to be held as 100% as charge-sheet is filed against the driver of tempo but the Tribunal had not considered that aspect. He had further submitted that disability, which was considered by the Tribunal to the tune of 10% body as a whole was also erroneous, therefore, he prayed that the present appeal was required to be allowed as the Tribunal had committed material errors in considering the documentary evidence available on record while considering the aspect of negligence.<\/p>\n

Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the Tribunal had not committed any error in considering the amount of compensation nor committed any error in considering the aspect of negligence in its judgment. They submitted that the Tribunal had given sufficient reasons, moreover, both the Advocates have submitted that the amount which was challenged in the present appeal was Rs.65,200\/- only and looking to the smallness of the amount, the appeal was required to be dismissed.<\/p>\n

The Court considered the aspect of the negligence from the Panchnama drawn of the scene of offence which revealed that none of the drivers had applied brakes and the road having the width of 11 feet only there is no divider, therefore, considering the position of the vehicle and also considering the FIR, the Tribunal has rightly found that the negligence of Tempo is 80% and negligence of Motorcycle is 20%. Moreover, with regard to the liability aspect, which was considered by the Tribunal by holding the Insurance Company to pay the entire amount, is also found just and proper in the circumstances of the case and more particularly the claimant is pillion rider and is a third party to both of the vehicles and he can recover the amount from any of the tortfeasors. The Court further relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Khenyei v. New Indian Assurance Co. Ltd., (2015) 9 SCC 273<\/a> where it was held that it would be open for the Insurance Company to recover 20% of the amount from the owner of the bike.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the appeal stating that it is needless to say that the Insurance Company was unnecessarily filing such an appeal for a small amount like Rs 65,200\/- in such glaring facts and circumstances of the case.[National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajeen Rafiqahmed Vohra, R\/First Appeal NO. 435 of 2014, decided on 06-05-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

For the Appellant: Mr Dakshesh Mehta<\/p>\n

For the Defendant: Mr Amit C Nanavati, Mr Ankur Y Oza<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gujarat High Court: Sandeep N. Bhatt, J. dismissed an appeal preferred by the Insurance Company being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":206146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11661],"class_list":["post-267453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-motor-accident-claims-tribunal"],"yoast_head":"\nGuj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Appeal dismissed on grounds of smallness of amount\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Appeal dismissed on grounds of smallness of amount\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-27T07:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/\",\"name\":\"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-27T07:30:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Appeal dismissed on grounds of smallness of amount\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld | SCC Times","description":"Appeal dismissed on grounds of smallness of amount","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld","og_description":"Appeal dismissed on grounds of smallness of amount","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-27T07:30:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/","name":"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-27T07:30:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Appeal dismissed on grounds of smallness of amount","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/appeal-dismissed-on-grounds-of-smallness-of-amount\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guj HC | Appeal dismissed on grounds of meagre amount; Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/pat-hc-court-interference-with-quantum-of-compensation-granted-by-motor-accident-claims-tribunal-held-not-warranted\/","url_meta":{"origin":267453,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Court interference with\u00a0quantum of compensation granted by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, held not warranted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of S. Kumar, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurance company against the judgment and award passed by Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Bihar. The son of claimant died on the spot when a vehicle dashed against him. As a result, he filed a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/ph-hc-legal-representatives-of-deceased-can-maintain-application-under-s-166-of-motor-vehicles-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":267453,"position":1},"title":"P&H HC | Legal representatives of deceased can maintain application under S. 166 of Motor Vehicles Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Kuldip Singh, J. modified the claim allowed by the Tribunal on the ground that the deceased was maintaining her family. An appeal was filed by the claimant against the award made by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal. Facts of the case were that car accident\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/27\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-motor-accident-claims-must-be-proved-on-the-touchstone-of-preponderance-of-probabilities\/","url_meta":{"origin":267453,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court| Motor Accident claims must be proved on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities","author":"Editor","date":"July 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., has upheld the award by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) stating that it is duty of the claimant to prove the factum of the accident in the proceedings under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (MV Act'). The present appeal was preferred by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225945,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/tri-hc-non-progressive-injury-resulting-in-application-of-formula-to-calculate-compensation-held-correct-appeal-of-insurance-company-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":267453,"position":3},"title":"Tri HC | Non-progressive injury resulting in application of formula to calculate compensation held correct; appeal of insurance company rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Akil Kureshi, CJ., dismissed an appeal filed aggrieved by the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal by the insurance company. The original claimant had been travelling on a motorcycle as a pillion rider when the vehicle collided with a four-wheeler of TATA ACE make coming from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/09\/pat-hc-insurance-company-granted-the-right-to-recover-half-of-compensation-amount-from-the-owner-insurer-of-the-other-vehicle-involved-in-an-accident-caused-due-to-composite-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":267453,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | Insurance Company granted right to recover half of compensation amount from owner\/ insurer of other vehicle involved in an accident caused due to composite negligence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: S. Kumar, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the insurance company on the grounds that the parties were liable severally as well as jointly. Although the company had the right to recover such compensation paid from the other party involved in the accident for which insurance was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":312550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/pillion-rider-contributory-negligence-motorcycle-road-accident-comepenation-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":267453,"position":5},"title":"Know why Karnataka High Court held a pillion rider liable for contributory negligence towards her accident","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court also held that the claimant is entitled to only 80% of the total compensation amount determined and is also not entitled for compensation towards loss of future earnings due to disability.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267453\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/206146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}