{"id":267327,"date":"2022-05-24T14:00:39","date_gmt":"2022-05-24T08:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267327"},"modified":"2022-05-27T09:09:59","modified_gmt":"2022-05-27T03:39:59","slug":"the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. remarked \u201cthere has been no matrimonial relationship between the parties for the last nearly two decades, which in itself establishes that the parties are not in a position to live together any longer.\u201d<\/p>\n

The brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the appellant and respondent was solemnised in 1983 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, on account of matrimonial discord, appellant filed a petition for divorce in the year 1985-86 which, however, was ultimately compromised.\u00a0 Thereafter, the parties resided peacefully and out of wedlock two sons were born. But allegedly even after those differences continued which even took the shape of occasional violence. Both even accused each other of adultery. The Trial Court passed a decree of dissolution of marriage in favour of the husband. Aggrieved by the decree of divorce passed by the Trial Court below, the appellant – wife has filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

Counsel for petitioner Suneet Goel submitted that the Trial Court erred in coming to the conclusion that the wife is living in adultery, which contention had already been negated by the Court while adjudicating the petition filed by the wife for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.<\/p>\n

Counsel for respondents Varinder Thakur submitted that as regards the findings recorded by Trial Court under Section 125 CrPC. the same were not binding on the matrimonial Court in the matrimonial disputes and secondly, there is ample amount of evidence available on record, which shows that wife was living in adultery<\/p>\n

The Court relied on judgment Pranab Kumar Karmakar v. Aarti Karmakar<\/em>, 2008 SCC OnLine Cal 833<\/a>\u00a0 and observed that the findings in a proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata<\/em>. A matrimonial Court is required to arrive at an independent finding based on a material laced before it.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed in light of the pleadings, evidence and subsequent events, that there has been no matrimonial relationship between the parties for the last nearly two decades, which in itself establishes that the parties are not in a position to live together any longer. <\/strong>Moreover, each of the parties is already residing with a partner of opposite sex as husband and wife. Their relations are so strained that there is no possibility of reconciliation and the marriage between them has broke down irretrievably.<\/p>\n

Thus, It would be unrealistic for law to not take notice of the fact that the irretrievable broke down of marriage must be considered as a ground for divorce.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Court held \u201cI find no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.\u201d<\/em> [Sunita Devi v. Suresh Kumar, 2022 SCC OnLine HP 1968<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03-03-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. remarked \u201cthere has been no matrimonial relationship between the parties for the last nearly <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2638,48682,2846,2864,20091,2549,4021,49536,5353,4651],"class_list":["post-267327","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adultery","tag-beating","tag-divorce","tag-family_court","tag-first-appeal","tag-maintenance","tag-marriage","tag-matrimonial-court","tag-res-judicata","tag-violence"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-24T08:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-27T03:39:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-24T08:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-27T03:39:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata | SCC Times","description":"The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata","og_description":"The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-24T08:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-27T03:39:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/","name":"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-05-24T08:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-27T03:39:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/the-findings-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-cannot-be-binding-on-matrimonial-court-while-dealing-with-an-application-for-divorce-on-the-ground-of-res-judicata\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | The findings in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC cannot be binding on matrimonial Court while dealing with an application for divorce on the ground of res judicata"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/21\/can-judicial-separation-be-granted-instead-of-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":267327,"position":0},"title":"Can judicial separation be granted instead of divorce for which party has approached the Court? Read what Del HC says","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Expressing that the Family Court\u2019s decision was based on optimism and hope rather than the actual factual matrix of the case, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., while addressing a matter wherein matrimonial dispute occurred between the parties, observed that, \u201c..a decree of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264610,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/28\/unable-to-approve-this-kind-of-matrimonial-conduct-or-filing-a-suit-for-divorce-on-such-coloured-narrative\/","url_meta":{"origin":267327,"position":1},"title":"Tri HC | Unable to approve this kind of matrimonial conduct or filing a suit for divorce on such coloured narrative; Court dismisses appeal in matter of divorce","author":"Editor","date":"March 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of S. Talapatra and S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ. dismissed an appeal which was filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 from the judgment by the Additional District Judge declining to grant the divorce and consequently dismissing the suit. It was observed that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/14\/utt-hc-voluntarily-depriving-husband-of-wifes-company-and-comfort-of-matrimonial-life-amounts-to-cruelty-divorce-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":267327,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | Voluntarily depriving husband of wife\u2019s company and comfort of matrimonial life amounts to cruelty; Divorce granted\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Narayan Singh Dhanik, JJ. contemplated the special appeals preferred against the judgment of Family Court, where the divorce petition was filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and was subsequently dismissed but the counterclaim of the wife-respondent for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":267327,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Permanent residents of Singapore, residing there since 2012, wife seeks an injunction for suit filed in Singapore by husband regarding matrimonial dispute. HC rejects appeal. Why? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli, JJ., upheld the Family Court\u2019s decision and directed the parties approach the local Court of Singapore with regard to sorting out their matrimonial dispute.\u00a0 Issue Present appeal was filed seeking a direction against the Family Court\u2019s decision, wherein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256822,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/materialistic-attitude-of-husband-considering-wife-as-cash-cow\/","url_meta":{"origin":267327,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Materialistic attitude of husband considering wife as cash cow: Is it a ground to dissolve marriage? Read to know","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., noted in a matrimonial matter that the wife was being viewed as a cash cow and the husband became interested in her only after she got a job with Delhi Police. Instant appeal was directed against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":152154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/25\/in-a-divorce-petition-if-both-parties-are-domiciled-in-india-then-a-court-at-dubai-is-not-a-court-with-competent-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":267327,"position":5},"title":"In a divorce petition, if both parties are domiciled in India then a Court at Dubai is not a court with competent jurisdiction","author":"Saba","date":"August 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of A.S. Oka and Anuja Prabhudessai. JJ., heard an appeal filed by the appellant who was aggrieved by an order passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. Subsequent to the marriage between the appellant and respondent in India, they shifted to Dubai\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267327"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267327\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}