{"id":267300,"date":"2022-05-23T17:00:17","date_gmt":"2022-05-23T11:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267300"},"modified":"2022-08-12T18:21:00","modified_gmt":"2022-08-12T12:51:00","slug":"whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): <\/strong>The Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member) held that it is not within the domain of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for fixation of salary of the MD.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Facts of the Case<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Operational Creditor\/Managing Director had filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code on the ground that he was entitled to Rs 3 lakhs\/per month as remuneration, which was revised to Rs 4 lakhs, but the payment was short of the agreed sum.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, it was stated that the salary of the MD would be paid when the financial position of the company would improve. In May, 2019 the MD was removed by the Corporate Debtor without clearing his salary dues.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">Firstly, the tribunal addressed the issue whether the \u2018Claims\u2019 in the application filed under Section 9 of the Code, is \u2018barred by limitation\u2019?<\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench while referring to Section 18 of the Limitation Act, addressed whether there was any \u2018acknowledgment of debt\u2019\/ \u2018salary dues\u2019 to fall within the ambit of the stated Section.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, it was noted that there was no specific approval either of the payment of arrears or any fixation of the MD\u2019s remuneration or increase of his salary\/perks.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">\u201cThere is no crystallised quantum of amount which can be claimed as salary\/remuneration fixed by the Board of Directors as contemplated under Section 196 of the Companies Act, 2013.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">\u00a0<\/span>Article 40 of the Articles of Association of the appellant Company stipulates that the remuneration of the MD would be fixed by the Board of Directors from time to time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tribunal was of the view that the Section 9 Application filed was \u2018barred by limitation\u2019 as the claims of Rs 96,92,000 and Rs 18,00,000 pertained to the period prior to 31\/3\/2016 and more than three years had lapsed since.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Pre-Existing Dispute<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">From the record, the Coram noted that the remuneration of the MD was a \u2018disputed question of fact\u2019 and not within the Tribunal\u2019s domain under IBC to \u2018decide the issue of the fixation of the salary of the MD., but to ascertain is if here is any dispute regarding the issue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the matter was concluded stating that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed either the question of claims having been time-barred or to the issue of the existence of a \u2018Pre-Existing Dispute\u2019 between the parties. [Omega Laser Products B.V. v. Anil Agrawal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/vos9ws4e\">2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 294<\/a>, decided on 10-5-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Tribunal:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">For Appellant:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate with Sarojanand Jha, Mr. Karan Sharma, Mr. Suraj Malik, Mr. Vineet Dwivedi, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">For Respondent 1:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Arju Chaudhary, Mr. Rounak Nayak, Advocates for R-1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 195 of 2022<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">For Appellant:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Advocate with Kavita Sarin, Sarika Raichur, Mr. Nishant Menon, Mr. Rajat Gava, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">For Respondent No. 1:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Arju Chaudhary, Mr. Rounak Nayak, Advocates for R-1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member) held that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":267312,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[27634,30361,24144,22014,28954],"class_list":["post-267300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-companies-act","tag-ibc","tag-limitation-act","tag-nclat","tag-salary"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Can fixation of the salary of the MD be decided under IBC?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can fixation of the salary of the MD be decided under IBC?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-23T11:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-12T12:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1332\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"889\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/\",\"name\":\"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-23T11:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-12T12:51:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Can fixation of the salary of the MD be decided under IBC?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg\",\"width\":1332,\"height\":889},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains | SCC Times","description":"Can fixation of the salary of the MD be decided under IBC?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains","og_description":"Can fixation of the salary of the MD be decided under IBC?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-23T11:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-12T12:51:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1332,"height":889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/","name":"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-23T11:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-12T12:51:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Can fixation of the salary of the MD be decided under IBC?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg","width":1332,"height":889},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/23\/whether-fixation-of-salary-of-the-md-is-within-the-domain-of-ibc-legalnews-legalupdates-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether fixation of salary of the MD is within the domain of IBC? NCLAT explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NCLATMD.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/05\/nclat-pre-existing-dispute-regarding-salary-payable-renders-s-9-ibc-application-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":267300,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT | Pre-existing dispute regarding salary payable renders S. 9 IBC application not maintainable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi: The Bench comprising of S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson) and A.I.S Cheema, Member (Technical) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) declared an appeal filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 not maintainable in view of the pre-existing dispute. In the present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262177,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/if-a-case-was-filed-under-ibc-can-penalty-be-imposed-under-companies-act-nclat-addresses\/","url_meta":{"origin":267300,"position":1},"title":"If a case was filed under IBC, can penalty be imposed under Companies Act? NCLAT addresses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) held that if the Intervention Application was filed under the IBC, then, any penalty to be imposed should have been under the provisions of IBC and not Companies Act.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/22\/plea-of-pre-existing-dispute-must-co-relate-with-amount-claimed-by-operational-creditor-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":267300,"position":2},"title":"Plea of pre-existing dispute must co-relate with amount claimed by Operational Creditor: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"December 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Allowing the appeal as the impugned order is contrary to law, the bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that for a debtor to take the plea of pre-existing dispute under S. 8(2) the dispute must relate to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":284102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/16\/application-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-section-7-barred-by-limitation-dismissed-nclat-appeal-tds-debt-default-limitation-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":267300,"position":3},"title":"Deduction of TDS itself is not sufficient to conclude the transaction: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While dismissing the appeal challenging the order of Adjudicating Authority which dismissed a S. 7 IBC application on the ground of want of limitation, the Tribunal held that there is no question of going into the merits of the case and the application is barred by limitation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":219804,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/21\/nclat-nclt-new-delhi-in-terms-of-s-601-ibc-held-to-have-jurisdiction-in-s-7-application-against-corporate-debtor-having-properties-in-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":267300,"position":4},"title":"NCLAT | NCLT, New Delhi in terms of S. 60(1) IBC, held to have jurisdiction in S. 7 application against Corporate Debtor having properties in UP","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson); Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-Director of Corporate Debtor against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (New Delhi) whereby it had admitted the application filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/03\/financial-creditor-nclt-corporate-detor-cirp-allowed-appeal-application-condonation-of-delay-nclat-ibc-override-limitation-act-tribunal-no-power-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":267300,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | IBC overrides Limitation Act; Delay beyond period of 45 days cannot be condoned","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While adjudicating an appeal file with a delay of 55 days, the Tribunal held that S. 238 IBC overrides S. 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and therefore this Tribunal does not have power to condone a delay beyond a period of 45 days.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267300"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267300\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/267312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}