{"id":267240,"date":"2022-05-21T16:00:52","date_gmt":"2022-05-21T10:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=267240"},"modified":"2022-05-23T12:26:21","modified_gmt":"2022-05-23T06:56:21","slug":"it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar, CJ and R.K. Pattanaik J. dismissed the petition and upheld the judgment by CGIT, Bhubaneshwar declining the prayer of the Petitioner as regards the maintainability of the dispute before it.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. filed the instant petition questioning an order dated 24-01-2011 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar (CGIT) deciding the preliminary issue of maintainability against the Petitioner and in favour of Opposite Party 2-Workers\u2019 Union. The present dispute has its origins in an order dated 14th<\/sup> September 1992 passed by the Central Government referring the dispute in regard to the benefit of special TA\/DA and in the matter of holidays or festivals.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner Mr. N.K. Mishra submitted that Section 7-B (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act) which sets out the conditions under which the Central Government \u201cmay, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more National Industrial Tribunals for adjudication of the industrial disputes\u201d. The two conditions are that (i) the dispute should involve questions of national importance or (ii) are of such a nature that the industrial establishment situated in more than one State is likely to be interested in or effected by such disputes. According to Mr. Mishra the nature of the dispute referred for adjudication by the Central Government in the present case satisfies both the above requirements. Thus, the word \u2018may\u2019 occurring in Section 7-B ID Act should be read as \u2018shall\u2019.<\/p>\n

It was further submitted by the petitioner\u2019s counsel that Section 7-B of the ID Act should be read with Section 10 (1-A) of the ID Act which states that if an industrial dispute involves question of national importance or is of such nature that industrial establishment situated in more than one State are likely to be interested in or affected by such dispute, the Central Government \u201cmay, whether or not it is the appropriate Government in relation to that dispute, at any time<\/em><\/strong>, by order in writing referred the dispute for any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, whether it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Schedule, to a National Tribunal for adjudication\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the expression used both in Section 7-A as well as Section 10 (I-A) of the ID Act is \u2018may\u2019 as qualifying what the Central Government can do. It is not mandatory for the Central Government, even if the twin conditionality are satisfied, to refer the disputes for adjudication to a National Tribunal. It may so happen that because of the placement of the parties, the dispute can well be adjudicated by a geographically proximate Tribunal. For instance, in the present case, although the Union which is espousing the workmen\u2019s cause is located in Ranchi, the Petitioner has its Offices in all over India and therefore, vis-\u00e0-vis both the parties, a CGIT at Bhubaneswar would be proximate and convenient for them to adjudicate the dispute.<\/p>\n

The Court remarked in the present day and age, when there are virtual courts, it is now possible for a Tribunal in Bhubaneswar to examine witnesses virtually all over the country, and therefore that inconvenience is a thing of the past and secondly, this dispute has been pending for more than three decades now and the Court does not consider it expedient at this stage to require the dispute to be referred to a National Tribunal for parties to start all over again before that Tribunal. That would be most inconvenient to all the parties.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that in terms of Section 7-B of the ID Act read with Section 10 (1-A) thereof it is not mandatory for the Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Court held \u201cthe Court is not persuaded that in the present case, the CGIT has erred in declining the prayer of the Petitioner as regards the maintainability of the dispute before the CGIT, Bhubaneswar.\u201d <\/em>[Om Prakash Kumawat v. Hero Housing Finance Ltd., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6199\/2022, decided on 11-05-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

Appearances<\/strong><\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s): Mr. Prahlad Sharma<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s): Mr. Pramod Kumar<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar, CJ and R.K. Pattanaik J. dismissed the petition and upheld the judgment by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49505,49506,3278,9821,48807,49504,49508,49507],"class_list":["post-267240","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cgit","tag-id-act","tag-industrial_dispute","tag-maintainability","tag-national-importance","tag-national-tribunal","tag-s-10-id-act","tag-s-7-id-act"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-21T10:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-23T06:56:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-21T10:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-23T06:56:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act | SCC Times","description":"It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act","og_description":"It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-21T10:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-23T06:56:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/","name":"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-05-21T10:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-23T06:56:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/it-is-not-mandatory-for-central-government-to-make-a-reference-of-a-dispute-which-is-of-national-importance-to-a-national-tribunal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | It is not mandatory for Central Government to make a reference of a dispute which is of national importance to a National Tribunal in view of S. 7-B r\/w S 10 (1-A) ID Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320268,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/18\/bombay-hc-quashes-order-cgit-to-reinstate-employee-slapped-supervisor-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":267240,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Shocking and Astounding order\u2019; Bombay HC quashes CGIT\u2019s order reinstating employee who slapped supervisor","author":"Editor","date":"April 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found it shocking that the CGIT did not find the act of an employee slapping his supervisor without provocation to be serious, and such misconduct ought to be visited with penalty of termination.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270774,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/whether-s-5-limitation-act-1963-apply-to-appeals-under-s-18-of-posh-act-2013-delhi-high-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":267240,"position":1},"title":"Whether S. 5 Limitation Act, 1963 apply to appeals under S. 18 of POSH Act, 2013? Delhi High Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: C Hari Shankar, J. opined that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 will apply in respect of appeals preferred under Section 18 Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition & Redressal), Act 2013 (\u2018POSH Act') because if a Court were to refuse to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/15\/bombay-high-court-dismisses-petition-filed-by-air-india-employees-union-challenging-their-right-to-occupy-allotted-accomodation-residential-premises-after-privatisation-divestment-legal-news-researcha\/","url_meta":{"origin":267240,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court dismisses petition by Air India Employees Union alleging their \u2018right to occupy\u2019 allotted accommodations after privatization","author":"Arunima","date":"March 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that if such a small number of employees continue to hold on to the accommodations, the AIAHCL will not be able to monetize the land to reduce the burden of debt AIL put on it.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/central-council-of-homeopathy-is-industry-as-per-industrial-dispute-act-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":267240,"position":3},"title":"Central Council of Homeopathy is \u2018Industry\u2019 as per Industrial Dispute Act: Delhi HC upholds reinstatement of compulsorily retired workman","author":"Editor","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that Section 33-A is a special provision which aims to adjudicate as to whether conditions of a service, etc. have been changed during the pendency of proceedings before an Industrial Tribunal.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/beneficial-standing-orders-prevail-over-employer-employee-agreements-sc-temporary-workmen-jet-airways-permanency\/","url_meta":{"origin":267240,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Beneficial Standing Orders to prevail over employer-employee agreements\u2019; SC holds workmen temporarily engaged with Jet Airways entitled to permanency","author":"Ridhi","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court regarded the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 as a special Act expressly and exclusively dealing with the schedule-enumerated conditions of service of workmen in industrial establishments, giving recognition and form to workmen's hard-won and precious rights.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"employer-employee agreements","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/employer-employee-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/employer-employee-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/employer-employee-agreements.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/employer-employee-agreements.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234301,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/20\/p-hc-dismisses-writ-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":267240,"position":5},"title":"P&H HC | Orders of State Commission in consumer dispute matters to be appealed before National Commission; HC dismisses writ petition","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab & Haryana High Court: Suvir Sehgal, J., dismissed the writ petition for lack of maintainability and directed the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The petitioner has sought for the quashing of the order passed by the respondent in Consumer Complaint No. 35\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267240","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=267240"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/267240\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=267240"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=267240"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=267240"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}