{"id":266820,"date":"2022-05-13T10:00:15","date_gmt":"2022-05-13T04:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=266820"},"modified":"2022-05-13T10:27:39","modified_gmt":"2022-05-13T04:57:39","slug":"in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of The United States: <\/strong>While deciding the instant issue related to the First Amendment, the SCOTUS Justices had to decide that whether the City of Boston violated the Free Speech Clause in refusing to allow a local organisation fly their \u201cChristian flag\u201d. In an unanimous decision, the Court held that the flag-raising program did not express government speech; therefore, Boston\u2019s refusal to let petitioners fly their flag, violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, as third- party flag raisings form private speech and not government speech.<\/p>\n

Background and Legal Trajectory: <\/strong>There are three flagpoles outside the entrance to Boston City Hall, on City Hall Plaza. The first and the second flag pole carries the American flag and the flag of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts respectively. The third flag pole usually flies Boston\u2019s own flag, but the City had allowed groups to hold ceremonies on the plaza during which participants may hoist a flag of their choosing on the third pole in place of the city\u2019s flag- like other countries\u2019 flags, or flags associated with groups or causes, like the Pride Flag, a banner honoring emergency medical service workers etc.<\/p>\n

In 2017, Harold Shurtleff, the director of an organization called Camp Constitution, asked to hold an event on the plaza to celebrate the civic and social contributions of the Christian community. As part of that event, he wished to raise what he described as the \u201cChristian flag<\/em>\u201d. Concerned that flying a religious flag at City Hall could violate the Establishment Clause and finding no past instance of the city\u2019s having raised such a flag, the Commissioner of Boston\u2019s Property Management Department told Shurtleff that the group could hold an event on the plaza but could not raise their flag during the celebrations.<\/p>\n

Shurtleff and Camp Constitution took the legal route claiming that Boston\u2019s refusal to let them raise their flag violated, among the First Amendment\u2019s Free Speech Clause.<\/p>\n

The District Court held that flying private groups\u2019 flags from City Hall\u2019s third flagpole amounted to government speech, so Boston could refuse petitioners\u2019 request without running afoul of the First Amendment. The same was affirmed by the First Circuit.<\/p>\n

*The First Amendment <\/strong>provides that Congress makes no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a redressal of grievances[1]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Observations:<\/strong> The Full Bench of the Court comprising of John Roberts, C.J., Stephen Breyer (who delivered the opinion of the Court), Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barret, JJ., upon perusing the facts of the case, framed the issue that whether the flags Boston allows others to fly, express government speech, and whether Boston could deny petitioners\u2019 flag-raising request.<\/p>\n

Vis-a-vis government speech, the Court noted that The Free Speech Clause does not prevent the government from declining to express a view.\u00a0 The government must be able to decide what to say and what not to say when it states an opinion – \u201cThe boundary between government speech and private expression can blur when, as here, the government invites the people to participate in a program. In those situations, the Court conducts a holistic inquiry to determine whether the government intends to speak for itself or, rather, to regulate private expression<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

It was observed that at the time of refusal, Boston had no written policy limiting use of the flagpole based on the content of a flag – \u201cThe most salient feature of this case is that Boston neither actively controlled these flag raisings nor shaped the messages the flags sent…But the key issue is whether Boston shaped or controlled the flags\u2019 content and meaning; such evidence would tend to show that Boston intended to convey the flags\u2019 messages as its own<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Referring to the precedents of Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., et al.<\/em><\/strong>, 2015 SCC OnLine US SC 67<\/a> , Matal, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Tam<\/em><\/strong>, 2017 SCC OnLine US SC 84<\/a> and Pleasant Grove City v. Summum<\/em><\/strong>, 2009 SCC OnLine US SC 22; <\/a>\u00a0the Justices stated that the city\u2019s practice was to approve flag raisings without exception. Since at the time, Boston had no clear written policies or internal guidance about what flags groups could fly and what those flags would communicate; thus Boston\u2019s control is not comparable to the degree of government involvement like in the selection of park monuments (Summum<\/em><\/strong>) or license plate designs (Walker<\/em><\/strong>).<\/p>\n

Conclusion: <\/strong>With Boston\u2019s lack of meaningful involvement in the selection of flags or the crafting of their messages, the Court went on to classify the third-party flag raisings as private and not government speech<\/p>\n

Further noting that Boston denied the petitioner\u2019s request on the sole concern of the religious nature of the flag, the Court held that since the flag-raising program did not express government speech, and Boston\u2019s refusal to let petitioners fly their flag violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment – \u201cWhen the government does not speak for itself, it may not exclude private speech based on \u201creligious viewpoint\u201d; doing so \u201cconstitutes impermissible viewpoint discrimination<\/em>\u201d\u201d.<\/p>\n

[Harold Shurtleff v. City of Boston, No. 20\u20131800, decided on 02-05-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

[1]<\/a> The Constitution,<\/a> The White House<\/p>\n

\n

Sucheta Sarkar, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of The United States: While deciding the instant issue related to the First Amendment, the SCOTUS Justices had to decide <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":32691,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[43869,47711,42901,2647,30014],"class_list":["post-266820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-first-amendment","tag-flags","tag-free-speech","tag-religion","tag-scotus"],"yoast_head":"\nIn refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-13T04:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-13T04:57:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/\",\"name\":\"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-13T04:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-13T04:57:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court of The United States\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0 | SCC Times","description":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0","og_description":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-13T04:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-13T04:57:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/","name":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-13T04:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-13T04:57:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Supreme Court of The United States"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/in-refusing-a-local-organisation-to-fly-their-christian-flag-at-the-entrance-of-city-hall-did-city-of-boston-violate-the-first-amendment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In refusing a local organisation to fly their \u201cChristian Flag\u201d at the entrance of City Hall, did City of Boston violate the First Amendment?\u00a0 SCOTUS answers\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/04\/scotus-colorado-anti-discrimination-laws-cannot-compel-creating-designs-contrary-personal-beliefs-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":266820,"position":0},"title":"Colorado’s anti-discrimination law cannot compel a wedding website designer to create expressive designs contrary to her personal beliefs on marriage: SCOTUS","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court with a ratio of 6:3 protected the First Amendment right of the petitioner who believes in heterosexual marriages only.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"supreme court of the united states","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-of-the-united-states.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-of-the-united-states.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-of-the-united-states.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/supreme-court-of-the-united-states.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/04\/kneeling-at-the-football-field-after-games-to-offer-a-quiet-personal-prayer-whether-such-observances-are-protected-under-the-us-constitutions-first-amendment-scotus-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":266820,"position":1},"title":"Kneeling at the football field after games to offer a quiet personal prayer: whether such observances are protected under the US Constitution’s First Amendment? SCOTUS answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States: While deliberating upon the instant matter, wherein the petitioner lost his job as a high school football coach in the Bremerton School District, after he knelt at midfield after games to offer a quiet personal prayer; the Court held that, the Free Exercise and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324486,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/16\/trump-too-small-trademark-registration-donald-trump-scotus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":266820,"position":2},"title":"Refusal to register \u201cTrump too small\u201d trademark under Lanham Act\u2019s \u2018Names Clause\u2019 does not violate the First Amendment: SCOTUS","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2016, after watching a Presidential primary debate exchange between then-candidate Donald Trump and Senator Marco Rubio, the respondent sought to federally register the trademark \u201cTrump too small\u201d to use on shirts and hats.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Trump too small trademark SCOTUS","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Trump-too-small-trademark-SCOTUS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Trump-too-small-trademark-SCOTUS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Trump-too-small-trademark-SCOTUS.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Trump-too-small-trademark-SCOTUS.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352376,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/texas-age-verification-law-for-pornography-sites-scotus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":266820,"position":3},"title":"SCOTUS upholds Texas\u2019 H.B. 1181 law mandating age verification for users visiting pornography websites","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2023, Texas enacted H. B. 1181, requiring certain commercial websites publishing sexually explicit content that is obscene to minors to verify that visitors are 18 or older.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Texas age verification law pornography sites","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Texas-age-verification-law-pornography-sites.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Texas-age-verification-law-pornography-sites.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Texas-age-verification-law-pornography-sites.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Texas-age-verification-law-pornography-sites.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/24\/snapchat-posts\/","url_meta":{"origin":266820,"position":4},"title":"\u201cAmerica\u2019s public schools are nurseries of democracy\u201d- SCOTUS rules in favour of student suspended for her off-campus improper Snapchat posts criticising the school","author":"Editor","date":"June 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States: The Court by an overwhelming majority of 8:1 held that a student\u2019s suspension from school\u2019s cheerleading squad because of her off-campus Snapchat posts expressing her frustration with the school, violates such student\u2019s Freedom of Speech and Expression as enshrined within the First Amendment. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/26\/same-sex-couples-as-foster-parents\/","url_meta":{"origin":266820,"position":5},"title":"SCOTUS | Whether Philadelphia\u2019s refusal to contract with a Catholic agency for providing foster care services unless they agree to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the First Amend\u00adment? \u00a0\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"July 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States: While looking into the question that whether the city of Philadelphia violated the First Amendment by discontinuing to refer deprived children to the Catholic Social Services (hereinafter CSS) on account of its refusal to certify same-sex cou\u00adples to be foster parents due to its\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266820\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}