{"id":266656,"date":"2022-05-10T12:00:22","date_gmt":"2022-05-10T06:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=266656"},"modified":"2022-05-13T15:14:13","modified_gmt":"2022-05-13T09:44:13","slug":"permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> Anil Verma, J. dismissed a criminal revision filed against the impugned order whereby an application preferred by the applicant\/prosecutrix under Section 311 of CrPC was been dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The father of the applicant\/prosecutrix had lodged an FIR that his minor daughter was missing from his house. During the investigation, it was found that the respondent \/ accused person abducted the minor prosecutrix and committed rape upon her. trial Court after framing the charges afforded an opportunity of hearing to the parties to adduce their evidence. Prosecutrix has been examined before the trial Court and after two years of examination, the applicant \/ prosecutrix had filed an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. stating that earlier when her statement was recorded she was minor and she deposed her statement under the pressure of her parents. Now she became major and got married, therefore, she wants to adduce her evidence afresh and wanted to examine herself as a witness before the trial Court again. Trial Court had rejected the application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case it was established that on earlier occasion prosecutrix was examined before the trial Court and after two years of her examination she has filed this application for restatement, but during the period of above 02 years prosecutrix did not made any complaint before the trial Court by stating that her statement was taken under the pressure of her parents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noted that prosecutrix statement had been recorded by the trial Court with due care and according to the law and after expiry of 02 years she has filed this application for re-examination, in these circumstances it appears that prosecutrix may be win over by the accused person by any undue means. <strong><em>Even if she permitted to change her statement before the Court, it would be dangerous for the legal system and it may be also misuse of Section 311 of Cr.P.C.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Criminal revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed opining that impugned order passed by the trial Court was just and proper and does not suffer from any legal infirmity.[X v. State of Madhya Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V2HF5gIv\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine MP 893<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-05-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For applicant: Mr Surya Patil<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For respondent: Mr Ranjeet Sen, Mr Pankaj Taknet<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: Anil Verma, J. dismissed a criminal revision filed against the impugned order whereby an application preferred by the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[23204,2572,13661,49399],"class_list":["post-266656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-pocso","tag-Rape","tag-re-examination","tag-restatement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-10T06:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-13T09:44:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-10T06:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-13T09:44:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed | SCC Times","description":"Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed","og_description":"Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-10T06:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-13T09:44:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/","name":"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-05-10T06:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-13T09:44:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/10\/permission-to-change-statement-before-court-would-be-dangerous-for-legal-system\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC \u2502 Permission to change statement before Court would be dangerous for legal system and it may be also misuse of S. 311 of CrPC; application for restatement after 2 years dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/29\/section-311-crpc-based-on-affidavit-filed-after-her-initial-testimony-mp-hc-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":266656,"position":0},"title":"Section 311 CrPC| Can Prosecutrix be recalled for further Cross-Examination based on affidavit filed after her initial testimony? MP High Court answers","author":"Ritu","date":"August 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 311 CrPC allows the court to recall a witness if it is essential for a just decision of the case, but such power must be exercised judiciously and with caution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/17\/misuse-of-advocate-client-relationship-mp-high-court-denies-to-quash-fir-in-rape-allegations-against-advocate-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":266656,"position":1},"title":"Misuse of Advocate-Client Relationship | MP High Court refuses to quash FIR in Rape allegations against Advocate","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStatement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC cannot be given preference over the FIR and the statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":104961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/11\/rape-charges-cannot-be-quashed-on-mere-retraction-of-prosecutrixs-statement\/","url_meta":{"origin":266656,"position":2},"title":"Rape charges cannot be quashed on mere retraction of prosecutrix\u2019s statement\u00a0","author":"Saba","date":"February 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While disposing of a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, the Single Bench\u00a0of S.P. Garg, J. held that if the prosecutrix had made specific and clear allegations against the\u00a0accused to have committed rape upon her, then the criminal proceedings against the accused\u00a0cannot be quashed merely on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":257681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/mp-hc-does-physical-relationship-with-a-minor-wife-come-within-the-category-of-rape\/","url_meta":{"origin":266656,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | Does physical relationship with a minor wife come within the category of rape?","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia J., rejected a bail application under Section 439 of CrPC. The appellant was arrested on 31-01-2021 in connection for offence under Sections 363, 376, 366 of IPC and Section 5\/6 of POCSO Act. Counsel for the applicant submitted that Court while deciding fourth bail\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":335045,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/13\/mp-high-court-upholds-closure-of-right-to-cross-examine-prosecutrix-due-to-usage-of-intentional-delay-tactics-to-harass-prosecutrix-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":266656,"position":4},"title":"MP High Court upholds closure of right to cross-examine prosecutrix due to usage of intentional delay tactics to harass her","author":"Ritu","date":"November 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The applicant bore sole responsibility for any adverse effects arising from the inability to cross-examine the prosecutrix due to repeated delay tactics.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344535,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/woman-though-cant-commit-rape-but-can-be-held-liable-for-abetment-to-rape-under-section-109-of-ipc-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":266656,"position":5},"title":"Woman though can\u2019t commit rape, but can be held liable for abetment to rape under Section 109 IPC: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u201cabetment is separate and distinct offence than rape\u201d and if the act abetted is committed in consequences of the abetment, then the person i.e. man or woman abeting such crime is liable to be punished under Section 109 of IPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266656"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266656\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}