{"id":266648,"date":"2022-05-11T15:00:30","date_gmt":"2022-05-11T09:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=266648"},"modified":"2022-05-11T15:14:01","modified_gmt":"2022-05-11T09:44:01","slug":"2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Read four articles and nine significant decisions of Supreme Court in Part 5 of 2022 SCC Volume 3.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appointment of Arbitrators: <\/strong>In this article, the author discusses the issue of validity of party appointed arbitrators in the case of multi-arbitrator tribunals, such as a three-member Arbitral Tribunal. Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators: Unfairness and Unequal Treatment of the Parties by Shamik Sanjanwala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9DKOg7Df\">(2022) 3 SCC (J-32)<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arbitration Act, 1940 \u2014 Ss. 30, 33 and 39 \u2014 Arbitral award \u2014 Scope of interference with, by Court \u2014 Law summarized:<\/strong> Once arbitrator had interpreted clauses of contract by taking a possible view and had gone to great lengths to analyse several reasons offered by appellant claimant to justify its plea that it was entitled to extension of time to execute the contract, Division Bench of High Court under S. 39 ought not to have sat over said decision as an appellate court seeking to substitute its view for that of the arbitrator. [Atlanta Ltd. v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/alB1bEAp\">(2022) 3 SCC 739<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11 and 34:<\/strong> Award passed by an arbitrator appointed under 1996 Act by Court with consent of parties despite the existence of M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 is binding, when the same attains finality i.e. is not appealed against. Subsequent invocation of arbitration under the 1983 Act regarding identical claims i.e. after an award has already been rendered by the arbitrator appointed under 1996 Act is not permissible. [M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board v. K.P. Dwivedi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ed6y7Ddw\">(2022) 3 SCC 783<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Child Sexual Assault:<\/strong> This article aims to briefly discuss various nuances of child sexual abuse as adjudicated in some important judgments to illuminate relevant substantive and procedural notions of the POCSO Act. In addition, with the help of recent global trends based on judicial interpretation and legal research, few submissions have also been culled out to reinforce the legal regime on CSA in India. \u201cSkin-To-Skin\u201d Touch for Defining Child Sexual Assault: Interpretational Vagaries of the POCSO Provisions by Dr G.K. Goswami &amp; Aditi Goswami <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2Y6RR517\">(2022) 3 SCC (J-16)<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Art. 226 \u2014 Interference with award of Industrial Tribunal \u2014 Permissibility \u2014 Extent of:<\/strong> In absence of any jurisdictional error or violation of natural justice or error of law apparent on face of record, interference by High Court in merits of controversy as appellate court, impermissible. [Indian Overseas Bank v. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7e4JB39p\">(2022) 3 SCC 803<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 19, 14 and 21: <\/strong>Law summarised regarding when proportionality test to be applied for determining reasonableness of restrictions or limitations on the rights concerned, specifically in the context of Art. 19(6) and more generally under Arts. 14 and 21. [Akshay N. Patel v. RBI, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7hTac9y6\">(2022) 3 SCC 694<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Foreword to <em>Law of Writs<\/em>:<\/strong> Foreword to V.G. Ramachandran\u2019s <em>Law of Writs<\/em> (Eastern Book Company, 7th Edn., 2022) by Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah. Foreword to <em>Law of Writs<\/em> by Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zxCweSt7\">(2022) 3 SCC (J-1)<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Insurance \u2014 Contract of Insurance\/Policy\/Terms\/Cover Note \u2014 Duties of parties\/Uberrima Fides\/Uberrimae Fidei\/Claim to Insurance money\/Insurer&#8217;s liability:<\/strong> The duties of the insured and insurer to disclose all material facts at contract formation\/pre-contract stage or renewal stage, held, include the duty of the insurer or its agent to notify the insured of any material change(s) in the policy terms at the pre-contract or renewal stage. Thus, held, insurer cannot contend that the insured were under an obligation to enquire into and satisfy themselves in respect thereof, if a new term\/modified term had been introduced in the policy at the renewal stage. This duty of the insurer to disclose material terms\/new or altered terms at the pre-contract or renewal stage, is all the more onerous where insurance policies are in standard form and consumers hardly have any choice in the matter or any power to negotiate alteration of the terms of the policy. [Jacob Punnen v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/l43XB2Es\">(2022) 3 SCC 655<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Land Acquisition Act, 1894 \u2014 S. 54, 23(1-A) and 18 \u2014 Additional compensation:<\/strong> Interference with award of additional compensation, by Reference Court in exercise of its power under S. 18, when permissible, explained. [Ambalal Babulal Patel v. ONGC, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d0h8b3Wr\">(2022) 3 SCC 691<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Registration Act, 1908 \u2014 Ss. 17(1)(e), 17(1)(b) and 17(2)(v):<\/strong> Award or document providing for effectuating a division of joint family properties in the future, held, fell under S. 17(2)(v) and was thus exempt from compulsory registration. Test in such a case is whether document\/award itself creates an interest in a specific immovable property or merely creates a right to obtain another document of title. If a document\/award does not by itself create a right or interest in immovable property, but merely creates a right to obtain another document, which will, when executed create a right in the person claiming relief, the former document does not require registration and is accordingly admissible in evidence. [K. Arumuga Velaiah v. P.R. Ramasamy, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/B8QiK1vM\">(2022) 3 SCC 757<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Promotion \u2014 Incentive Scheme\/Financial Upgradation \u2014 Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme: <\/strong>In this case, it was held that Cl. 8.1 of the Scheme stipulated that on implementation of Sixth CPC&#8217;s recommendations, grade pay of Rs 5400 would be in two bands viz. PB-2 and PB-3 which would be treated as separate grade pays for grant of upgradation under the MACP Scheme. R-1 and R-2 erroneously granted grade pay of Rs 6600 for PB-3 under the MACP Scheme, which was later modified\/corrected as GP of Rs 5400 as per Cl. 8.1. The High Court by impugned judgment granted grade pay of Rs 6600 to respondents, which was held not sustainable. [Enforcement Directorate v. K. Sudheesh Kumar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DcJcgrw1\">(2022) 3 SCC 649<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Service Law \u2014 Reinstatement\/Back Wages\/Arrears \u2014 Reinstatement with back wages \u2014 Entitlement to \u2014 Principles summarized \u2014 Wrongful termination \u2014 Entitlement to back wages:<\/strong> Denial of back wages to appellant CA, whose termination was found unjustified, not proper. [Pradeep v. Manganese Ore (India) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/08RB52Ax\">(2022) 3 SCC 683<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Waiver of the Right to Object under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: <\/strong>This article seeks to trace the origin of Section 4 of the A&amp;C Act and to analyse it in the context of the other provisions of the Act and recent judgments of the courts in India. Section I sets out chronologically the discussions of the States in an attempt to provide the context in which Article 4 of the Model Law came to be introduced. Against the background set out in Section I, Section II analyses the text of Section 4 of the A&amp;C Act and the conditions governing its application with a focus on the interplay between Section 4 and other provisions of the Act. By analysing Section 4 of the A&amp;C Act in light of the judgments of the courts in India, these sections hope to provide an insight into the functioning of Section 4 of the A&amp;C Act and if it is in fact furthering its objective of efficiency. Waiver Of The Right To Object Under The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 by Medha Rao and C.K. Nandakumar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jFA8yHVv\">(2022) 3 SCC (J-4)<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Read four articles and nine significant decisions of Supreme Court in Part 5 of 2022 SCC Volume 3. Appointment of Arbitrators: In <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":249204,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[4751,49398,26884,29785,11411],"class_list":["post-266648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-scc","tag-2022-scc-vol-3-part-5","tag-cases-reported","tag-law","tag-supreme-court-cases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-11T09:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-11T09:44:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/\",\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-11T09:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-11T09:44:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5 | SCC Times","description":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5","og_description":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-11T09:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-11T09:44:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/","name":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-11T09:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-11T09:44:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-5-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":293633,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/the-conundrum-surrounding-the-unilateral-appointment-of-arbitrators-and-its-implications-on-the-enforceability-of-arbitral-awards-an-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":266648,"position":0},"title":"The Conundrum Surrounding the Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators and its Implications on the Enforceability of Arbitral Awards \u2013 An Analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vasanth Rajasekaran\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 50","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"enforceability of arbitral award","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/enforceability-of-arbitral-award.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/enforceability-of-arbitral-award.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/enforceability-of-arbitral-award.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/enforceability-of-arbitral-award.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":229915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/21\/have-you-been-empanelled\/","url_meta":{"origin":266648,"position":1},"title":"Have you been empanelled?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Pooja Chakrabarti* and Kunal Dey**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259640,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/06\/can-section-125-of-arbitration-amendment-act-2015-be-invoked-retrospectively-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":266648,"position":2},"title":"Can Section 12(5) of Arbitration Amendment Act, 2015 be invoked retrospectively? Supreme Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Applying the rule against bias and neutrality of the Arbitrator, the Division Bench of M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, jj., reiterated that when the arbitration clause is found to be foul with Section 12 (5), the appointment of the arbitrator would be beyond the pale of the arbitration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SC-Image.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262786,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/28\/the-indian-supreme-court-in-ellora-paper-mills-hindsight-is-20-15\/","url_meta":{"origin":266648,"position":3},"title":"The Indian Supreme Court in Ellora Paper Mills: Hindsight is 20\/15?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shalaka Patil\u2020 and Amoga Krishnan\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 16","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-41.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-41.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-41.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-41.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-41.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322748,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/23\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":266648,"position":4},"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 4","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11(14) & Expln. thereto [as they stood prior to the 2019 Amendment Act], 31(8), 31-A, 38 and 39 \u2014 Arbitrators' fees \u2014 Determination of: Party autonomy is paramount in arbitrations. Unilateral fixation of fee by arbitrator\/Arbitral Tribunal i.e. issuance of a binding order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 4","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-4.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-4.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-4.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-4.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/12\/appointment-of-arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements\/","url_meta":{"origin":266648,"position":5},"title":"Appointment of Arbitrator in Lender-Borrower Agreements","author":"Editor","date":"May 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Mohd. Suboor\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitrator in lender-borrower agreements","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/249204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}