{"id":266579,"date":"2022-05-07T16:00:03","date_gmt":"2022-05-07T10:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=266579"},"modified":"2022-05-09T10:46:44","modified_gmt":"2022-05-09T05:16:44","slug":"whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>B.M. Shyam Prasad, J., held that there cannot be a complete adjudication of the petitioner\u2019s rights unless the third parties are also heard.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, the petitioner was a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 and first respondent was a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of real estate development and construction of multi-storied apartments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the second respondent was a company registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">What is the Dispute?<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The dispute was with regard to handing over vacant possession of certain apartments constructed in the property situated at Norris Road, Municipal ward No. 76, Richmond Town, Bengaluru. <em>[Subject Property]<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The said building was constructed by the first respondent in performance of the terms of the Joint Development Agreement and the Supplemental Agreement of even date. The said agreements were executed and registered amongst the petitioner and respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0The J.D. Agreement was executed contemporaneously with a Power of Attorney. The said agreement provided for the resolution of disputes\/difference amongst the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As per the terms of the JD Agreement, the second respondent was the owner of the subject property with the petitioner being described as the <em>Administrative Trustee <\/em>managing the affairs of the subject property, and the revenue records for the subject property were made in the respondent\u2019s name.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A dispute arose between the parties with respect to the allotment of the apartments. Hence the petitioner had filed a petition under Sections 11(4) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Firstly, the High Court referred to the Supreme Court decision in <em>Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn., <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/heu91okZ\">(2021) 2 SCC 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent&#8217;s objection to the reference of the dispute to arbitration was on multiple grounds such as that the dispute was essentially between two trusts, because of the <em>fraud <\/em>that was played by the first respondent in tandem with Sri Michael Sreenivasan, the dispute was time-barred, the parties did not agree upon mandatory arbitration and the dispute could not be just amongst the parties to the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the respondent contended that certain third parties entered into the shoes of the petitioner with the assignment of their respective rights in the subject apartments in favour of third parties and therefore, the claim was non-arbitrable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court stated that the proceeding under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act is not a stage for the Courts to enter into a mini-trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It emerged from the facts that the dispute was about the delivery of 3 apartments. The petitioner and the respondents entered into MOUs with third persons agreeing to assign their rights in the said apartments in favour of Kaveri Bai and Sudhir Jaganathan Kamath, who were not parties to the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was added that the petitioner was categorical in his pleadings in the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act that such MOUs had been executed in favour of the above-said. The petitioner while admitting creation of third-party rights, proposed adjudication of its right to recover possession of the subject apartments in the absence of the third parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In this Court\u2019s view, the dispute encompassed the question of facts which would have to be necessarily decided with due opportunity to the third parties who will not be parties to the arbitration proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench noted that, the petitioner did not even assert that the third parties would be bound by the arbitration clause as contained in the JD Agreement. The larger questions of facts involved the third-party rights, which were to be decided and such third parties would not even be parties to the arbitration proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lastly, the High Court concluded that, respondents must be protected from being forced to arbitrate when the matter was demonstrably non-arbitrable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, since the dispute was non-arbitrable, parties must necessarily work out the remedies in properly instituted proceedings with the third parties. [South Indian Biblical Seminary v. Indraprastha Shelters (P) Ltd., Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 129 of 2020, decided on 28-3-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Petitioner: Joshua Hudson Samuel, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondents: Navakesh Batra, Advocate and B.R. Dhanalakshmi, Advocate for R1; V.B. Shivakumar, Advocate for R2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: B.M. Shyam Prasad, J., held that there cannot be a complete adjudication of the petitioner\u2019s rights unless the third <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":266588,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2998,3226,30184,49376,28334,49168],"class_list":["post-266579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Agreement","tag-arbitration","tag-dispute","tag-joint-development-agreement","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-third-parties"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-07T10:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-09T05:16:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1340\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"896\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-07T10:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-09T05:16:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg\",\"width\":1340,\"height\":896},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers | SCC Times","description":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers","og_description":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-07T10:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-09T05:16:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1340,"height":896,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/","name":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-07T10:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-09T05:16:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg","width":1340,"height":896},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/whether-arbitration-involving-third-parties-leading-to-other-proceedings-would-be-arbitrable-karnataka-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether Arbitration involving third parties leading to other proceedings would be arbitrable? Kar HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/KarArb.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":63681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/25\/section-45-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-does-not-include-the-enquiry-as-to-the-legality-and-validity-of-the-substantive-contract\/","url_meta":{"origin":266579,"position":0},"title":"Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 does not include the enquiry as to the legality and validity of the substantive contract","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 25, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A pivotal question that came before the Court for consideration was that whether two Indian companies, Sasan Power Ltd. and NACC India Ltd., each of whom have been incorporated and registered in India could in law be said to have \u201cmade an agreement referred to in Section 44\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Alternate Dispute Resolution&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Alternate Dispute Resolution","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/alternate_dispute_resolution\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300002,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/25\/rajasthan-hc-appointed-arbitrator-bank-guarantee-forfeited-consideration-force-majeure-clause\/","url_meta":{"origin":266579,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court appoints sole arbitrator where performance security was forfeited without considering force majeure clause","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court exercised the powers conferred under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed, Jai Prakash Narayan Purohit, Retired Additional District Judge, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":161584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/04\/court-can-appoint-arbitrator-under-s-116-of-the-ac-act-if-those-nominated-by-parities-decline-to-act-as-such\/","url_meta":{"origin":266579,"position":2},"title":"Court can appoint Arbitrator under S. 11(6) of the A&#038;C Act if those nominated by parties decline to act as such","author":"Saba","date":"October 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a petition filed under S. 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint an Arbitral Tribunal, a Single Judge Bench of A.S. Bopanna, J. held that since the process of constitution of Arbitral Tribunal as decided by the parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":335098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/14\/supreme-court-refers-dispute-to-diac-sole-arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":266579,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Existence of arbitration agreement in license agreement and share subscription agreement not in dispute\u2019, Supreme Court refers matter to DIAC for appointment of sole arbitrator","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of either party including regarding the arbitrability of the dispute. All contentions and pleas are kept open for the parties to raise before the arbitral tribunal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appointment of Arbitrator","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Media-_12_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/disputes-arising-out-of-an-agreement-containing-arbitration-clause-must-be-settled-through-arbitration\/","url_meta":{"origin":266579,"position":4},"title":"Disputes arising out of an agreement containing arbitration clause, must be settled through arbitration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari, J. while hearing a petition praying for the appointment of an arbitrator, ruled that if an agreement between parties provides for arbitration and a dispute arises therefrom then it must be settled through arbitration. The petitioner company, involved in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353650,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/mp-hc-appoints-arbitrator-dispute-hukumchand-mill-area-development\/","url_meta":{"origin":266579,"position":5},"title":"Madhya Pradesh HC appoints Retd. Justice Alok Verma as arbitrator for dispute concerning development of Hukumchand Mill Area","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A dispute had arisen between the M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board and the applicant regarding non-performance of their consulting services in a given timeline as per their agreement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Hukumchand Mill Area development","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Hukumchand-Mill-Area-development.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266579\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/266588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}