{"id":266024,"date":"2022-04-27T17:00:23","date_gmt":"2022-04-27T11:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=266024"},"modified":"2022-05-06T10:21:04","modified_gmt":"2022-05-06T04:51:04","slug":"delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/","title":{"rendered":"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi:<\/strong> The Coram of Pradip Kumar Kedia (Accountant Member) and Narender Kumar Choudhry (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -XXXVI, New Delhi passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning AY 2013-14. The instant appeal challenged the disallowance of Rs 45,60,061 on account of delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution towards EPF and ESIC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal on perusal of records observed that the Assessing Officer has made the impugned addition on the ground that the assessee has deposited employee\u2019s contribution towards Provident Fund and ESI amounting to Rs 45,60,061\/ &#8211; after due date as prescribed under the relevant Act\/ Rules in breach of Explanation 5 to Section 43B of the Act. The Assessing Officer accordingly resorted to the additions under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24) (x) of the Act. Case of the assessee before lower authorities was that it had deposited the employee\u2019s contribution in EPF and ESIC before the due date of filing of return of income stipulated under Section 139(1) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal found that a similar issue was decided in favour of the assessee by the Delhi High Court in the case of <em>Pr.CIT v. Pro Interactive Service (India) (P) Ltd.<\/em>, ITA No.983 of 2018 order dated 10-09-2018 extract of which is as under:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cIn view of the judgment of the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax versus Aimil Limited, (2010) 321 ITR 508 (Del ) the issue is covered against the Revenue and, therefore, no substantial quest ion of law arises for consideration in this appeal . The legislative intent was \/ is to ensure that the amount paid is allowed as an expenditure only when payment is actually made. We do not think that the legislative intent and objective is to treat belated payment of Employee&#8217;s Provident Fund (EPF) and Employee&#8217;s State Insurance Scheme (ESI ) as deemed income of the employer under Sect ion 2(24) (x) of the Act .\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Following the above binding precedents the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of the assessee and delete the addition. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee finding that the <strong><em>delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as the amendments to Section 36(1) (va) and Section 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively in relation to Assessment Year 2021-22 and subsequent years. Therefore, the claim of deduction of contribution to Employee\u2019s State Insurance Scheme (ESI) and Provident Fund u\/s.36(1) (va) could not be denied to the assessee in Assessment Year 2014-15 in question on the basis of amendments made by Finance Act , 2021<\/em><\/strong> finding support from the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of Tribunal in the case of <em>The Continental Restaurant and Caf\u00e9 Company v. ITO<\/em>, (2021) 91 ITR (Trib. )(S.N. ) 60 (Bang. ) and <em>Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India P. Ltd. vs. ACIT<\/em>, ITA No.402 and 403\/Chny\/2021 order dated 08-12-2021.[Kiwi Enterprises (P) Ltd. v. ACIT, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/D05qb469\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine ITAT 148<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-04-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant by: None<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent by: Shri Parikshit Singh, Sr.D.R.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi: The Coram of Pradip Kumar Kedia (Accountant Member) and Narender Kumar Choudhry (Judicial Member) allowed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":170804,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[2590,42795,30711,49275,20601],"class_list":["post-266024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-Claim","tag-disallowance","tag-epf","tag-esi","tag-finance-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-27T11:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-06T04:51:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/\",\"name\":\"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-27T11:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-06T04:51:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed | SCC Times","description":"Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed","og_description":"Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-27T11:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-06T04:51:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/","name":"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-27T11:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-06T04:51:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/delayed-payment-of-employees-contribution-to-epf-esic\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ITAT | Delayed payment of employee\u2019s contribution to EPF\/ESIC is not disallowable as amendments to S. 36(1) (va) and S. 43B effected by Finance Act, 2021 were applicable prospectively; appeal allowed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/can-mere-rejection-of-the-claim-by-assessing-officer-make-assessee-liable-for-penalty-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":266024,"position":0},"title":"Can mere rejection of the claim by Assessing Officer, make assessee liable for penalty? ITAT explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (ITAT): Addressing the issue, of whether mere rejection of the claim by an Assessing Officer would ipso facto make assessee liable for the penalty, the Bench of G.S. Pannu (President) and Kul Bharat (Judicial Member) held that it won\u2019t make the assessee liable to a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ITATAO.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ITATAO.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ITATAO.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ITATAO.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ITATAO.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/26\/itat-can-exempted-income-which-is-not-part-of-the-total-income-alone-be-considered-for-disallowance-u-s-14a-of-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":266024,"position":1},"title":"ITAT| Can exempted income which is not part of the total income alone be considered for disallowance u\/s 14A of Income Tax Act?","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akshat Malpani\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/02\/30-reports-to-read-from-tribunals-and-commissions-legal-roundup-law-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":266024,"position":2},"title":"30 Reports to Read from Tribunals and Commissions | April and May RoundUp 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC) Framework of RTI Act restricts jurisdiction of CIC to provide a ruling on issues pertaining to access\/right to information, not venture into merits of case Neeraj Kumar Gupta (Information Commissioner), decides whether Commission can provide a ruling regarding the merits of a case or redressal of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/TribunalsCommissions.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/rpc-fee-paid-by-formula-one-is-not-liable-to-be-disallowed-under-clause-i-of-s-40a-itat-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":266024,"position":3},"title":"RPC fee paid by Formula One not liable to be disallowed; Second proviso to S. 40(a)(i) be given retrospective effect: ITAT","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"ITAT held that the second proviso to Clause (i) of Section 40(a) just like second proviso to clause (ia) of Section 40(a) was inserted to remove an anomaly and were therefore curative and declaratory in nature. Hence, it had to be given retrospective effect.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-494.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/07\/is-the-sale-of-carbon-credit-considered-revenue-or-capital-in-nature-itat-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":266024,"position":4},"title":"Is the sale of Carbon Credit considered revenue or capital in nature? ITAT elucidates","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai: While deciding the instant appeal wherein a major issue that came before Tribunal was whether receipts received by the assessee on sale of alleged carbon credit is revenue in nature or capital in nature. The coram of Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member) and Gagan Goyal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/11\/revenue-can-bring-expenditure-incurred-earlier-years-taxed-subsequent-years-itat\/","url_meta":{"origin":266024,"position":5},"title":"Can revenue bring expenditure incurred in earlier years to be taxed in subsequent years? ITAT answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After examining the expenses payable and the detailed order of the CIT,the ITAT held that the CIT has correctly examined the invoices, period and purpose for the expenses which have not been paid for the last six years","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"income tax appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/income-tax-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266024\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/170804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}