{"id":266013,"date":"2022-04-27T14:00:28","date_gmt":"2022-04-27T08:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=266013"},"modified":"2022-05-06T10:22:37","modified_gmt":"2022-05-06T04:52:37","slug":"power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","title":{"rendered":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., refused to interfere with the impugned order due to lack of any legal infirmity.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that an F.I.R., was lodged against the revisionist-petitioner for the offences under Sections 13 (1) (e) \/ 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as \u2018Act of 1988\u2019<\/em>) after two months of the recovery of an amount of Rs 50,000\/- which was alleged to be bribe money. The said F.I.R. was lodged after a delay of about 2 months from the date of recovery of the said amount from the revisionist petitioner. Thus, the charge sheet was filed against the petitioner under the aforementioned provisions of the Act of 1988. The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 CrPC was preferred seeking quashing of the impugned order.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that without looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, passed the impugned order, whereby it proceeded with framing of charges against the revisionist-petitioner, despite the factum of delay of two months in registration of the FIR.<\/p>\n

Counsel for respondent submitted that after taking into due consideration all the facts and circumstances of the present case and after considering the evidence placed on record before it, has rightly passed the impugned order.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Court relied on judgment Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal, <\/em>(1979) 3 SCC 4<\/a> wherein it was observed that<\/p>\n

Strong suspicion against the accused, if the matter remains in the region of suspicion, cannot take the place of proof of his guilt at the conclusion of the trial. But at the initial stage if there is a strong suspicion which leads the Court to think that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence then it is not open to the Court to say that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

The Court further relied on judgment State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, <\/em>1992 Supp (1) SCC 335<\/a> and observed that if a strong suspicion exists in the mind of the court at the stage concerned, then the same is sufficient for the court to proceed with the framing of the charge against the accused person(s). And if a prayer for discharge has been made before a revisional court, then the same may only be allowed if the court finds that the materials on record are wholly insufficient for the purpose of trial.<\/p>\n

The Court held \u201cthis Court does not find any legal infirmity in the impugned order passed by the learned court below so as to warrant any interference, at this stage.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

[Sudhir Bordiya v. State, 2022 SCC OnLine Raj 765<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-04-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

Appearances:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.S. Kotwani<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s): Mr. S.S. Rajpurohit<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., refused to interfere with the impugned order due to lack of any legal infirmity. The <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2673,38729,42088,49271,14071,2809],"class_list":["post-266013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-corruption","tag-criminal","tag-framing-of-charge","tag-power-of-revision","tag-prevention-of-corruption-act","tag-revision"],"yoast_head":"\nPower of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-27T08:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-06T04:52:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/\",\"name\":\"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-27T08:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-06T04:52:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges | SCC Times","description":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges","og_description":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-27T08:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-06T04:52:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","name":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-04-27T08:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-06T04:52:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":195834,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/07\/an-accused-doesnt-have-a-right-to-prove-his-innocence-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":266013,"position":0},"title":"An accused doesn\u2019t have a right to prove his innocence at the stage of framing of charges","author":"Saba","date":"May 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A criminal revision, filed against the order of Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) whereby charges under IPC and PCA were framed against the applicant, was dismissed by a Division Bench comprising of S.K. Seth and Nandita Dubey, JJ., holding it to be devoid of any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/trial-framing-of-charge-delhi-high-court-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":266013,"position":1},"title":"Does framing of charge means that accused is guilty or does it imply that accused may be guilty? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Expressing that, the revisional jurisdiction is not meant to test the waters of what might happen in the trial, Chandra Dhari Singh, J., held that at the stage of framing of charge, the judge is merely required to overview the evidence in order to find out whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/21\/alteration-of-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":266013,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Can an application for addition\/ alteration of charges be made by State at the stage when the matter is fixed for arguments? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"June 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the accused persons had connived with each other to hatch a conspiracy and misappropriated public funds. The State moved an application for addition of charge under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":318691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/29\/chairman-md-ed-of-private-banks-are-public-servants-telanganahc-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":266013,"position":3},"title":"Chairman, MD, ED, of private banks are public servants; Telangana HC allows prosecution of officials under Prevention of Corruption Act","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad, failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances and held that respondents are not public servants and accordingly exonerated them from offences under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/18\/to-stay-or-not-to-stay-trial-that-is-the-question-revisiting-asian-resurfacing-of-road-agency-p-ltd-v-cbi\/","url_meta":{"origin":266013,"position":4},"title":"To Stay or Not to Stay (Trial), that is the Question – Revisiting Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency (P) Ltd. v. CBI","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ram Kumar\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"To Stay or Not to Stay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/To-Stay-or-Not-to-Stay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/To-Stay-or-Not-to-Stay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/To-Stay-or-Not-to-Stay.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/To-Stay-or-Not-to-Stay.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223405,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/19\/all-hc-in-case-a-public-servant-has-retired-there-is-no-necessity-to-seek-prior-prosecution-sanction-for-prosecuting-him\/","url_meta":{"origin":266013,"position":5},"title":"All HC | In case a public servant has retired, there is no necessity to seek prior prosecution sanction for prosecuting him","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the impugned order did not suffer from any infirmity. In the instant case, the Basic Education Officer had opened an account by the name of Akhilesh Singh, the Principal of Maharana Pratap Junior High School\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}