{"id":265984,"date":"2022-04-27T09:00:13","date_gmt":"2022-04-27T03:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265984"},"modified":"2022-04-28T15:18:28","modified_gmt":"2022-04-28T09:48:28","slug":"in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and Vinay Joshi, JJ., expressed that only because 83% of the property for the project is acquired, it would be egregious not to apply the provision of the statute for determination of compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the Bench added that, if by private negotiation, the lands are acquired the compensation paid cannot be the criteria to determine the market value for the claimants who do not agree to private negotiation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner had assailed corrigendum dated 11-9-2018, under the said corrigendum, the circular dated 30-8-2019 was not made applicable to the acquisition for the Nagpur-Mumbai Express Highway Project.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, under the Government Resolution dated 13-8-2018, the Government had taken a decision to consider the ready reckoner as per the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 for the purpose of determining the market value of the land. The said decision was sought to be escaped for the Nagpur-Mumbai Express Highway Project.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner\u2019s counsel submitted that the respondents cannot differentiate between the projects while determining the compensation amount and same would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocate General for the State submitted that guidelines were provided for the determination of the ready reckoner rates under the Indian Stamps Act. Further, it was submitted that in case the award was passed, the petitioners have right to assail before the executive. Before the executive, the petitioner can raise all the contentions.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court stated that the acquisition made for Nagpur-Mumbai Express Highway is under the provisions of the Maharashtra Highway Act and if the acquisition is under the Maharashtra Highway Act, then the provisions of Section 26 to 30 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 are applicable for determination of the compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em>Section 26 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act lays down the following criteria for determination of compensation.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench remarked that, for determining the compensation amount, the market value, if any, specified in the Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale as the case may be in the area of the land situated has to be considered.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Powers of Executive<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Executive in absence of any provision has got powers to issue Government Resolutions, Circulars, and Administrative Instructions under Article 162 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>In case, no provision exists governing the field, then in that case, the Government Resolutions and Circulars can be issued, exercising executive powers. If a particular field is governed by the statute and\/or rules, then the executive instructions has to be in conformity with the statutory provisions and the Rules. In exercise of executive power, the Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing the statutory provisions and the rules.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court held that executive instructions cannot supplant statutory provisions or the rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In light of the above discussion, the impugned corrigendum dated 11-9-2018 was set aside and the petitioner has a remedy to assail the award before the appropriate forum in accordance with law as may be permissible. [Radhika J. Bhalerao v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lW6tQhqN\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Bom 856<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-32022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Nikhil Mengade with Mr. Dhaval Deshpande, Rahul Lathi, Yash Jariwala and Pranay Dave, for the Petitioners in all the Petitions.<br \/>\nMr. Vijay Patil, for Respondent No.3 in WP No.3683 of 2020 and WP(St.) No.94031 of 2020.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Advocate General with Mr. P. P. Kakade, G.P. with Mr. Akshay Shind, \u2018B\u2019 Panel Counsel with Mr. R. M. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent-State in all the Petitions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and Vinay Joshi, JJ., expressed that only because 83% of the property for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":266001,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2518,2728,29844,48054,42834,42768],"class_list":["post-265984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-compensation","tag-executive-power","tag-highway","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-updates"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In exercise of executive power, Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing statutory provisions and rules\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In exercise of executive power, Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing statutory provisions and rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-27T03:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-28T09:48:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-27T03:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-28T09:48:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"In exercise of executive power, Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing statutory provisions and rules\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC | SCC Times","description":"In exercise of executive power, Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing statutory provisions and rules","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC","og_description":"In exercise of executive power, Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing statutory provisions and rules","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-27T03:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-04-28T09:48:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/","name":"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-27T03:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-28T09:48:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"In exercise of executive power, Executive cannot issue instructions, circumscribing statutory provisions and rules","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/in-exercise-of-executive-power-executive-cannot-issue-instructions-circumscribing-statutory-provisions-and-rules-bombay-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"For determining land acquisition compensation, market value, if any, specified in Stamp Act for registration of Sale Deed and\/or Agreement of Sale has to be considered: Bom HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/CompBom.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/13\/bombay-high-court-grants-bail-to-nigerian-national-who-spent-2-years-in-jail-on-ndps-charges-due-to-a-typing-error-in-forensic-report-asks-state-to-come-up-with-compensation-proposal\/","url_meta":{"origin":265984,"position":0},"title":"Bombay High Court grants bail to Nigerian national who spent 2 years in jail on NDPS charges due to a typing error in forensic report; asks State to come up with compensation proposal","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J. directed to release a Nigerian National on bail who was arrested in 2020 under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 after discovering that there was a typing error in the forensic analysis report of the seized substances. On specific information received that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/02\/ready-reckoner-price-cannot-be-basis-for-determining-for-compensation-of-land-acquisition-bsnl-bombay-high-court-supreme-court-india-legal-update-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":265984,"position":1},"title":"Ready Reckoner Price cannot be the basis for determining compensation for land acquisition: SC declares Bombay HC\u2019s decision per incuriam\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While reversing the impugned decision of the Bombay High Court, M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., held that the prices mentioned in the Ready Reckoner cannot be the basis for determining compensation for the land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.\u00a0 By the instant appeal, Bharat Sanchar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Twin-conditions-under-Section-45-of-the-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-reasonable-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266484,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/06\/market-price-land-acquisition-compensation-determination-supreme-court-judgments-legal-news-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":265984,"position":2},"title":"Land Acquisition| Can market value be determined retrospectively based on the market value of land acquired two years later? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the Court was posed with the question as to whether determination of market value subsequent to the notification would be relevant to determine the market value of the land acquired more than two years earlier, the bench of Hemant Gupta* and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-158.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-158.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-158.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-158.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-158.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297218,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/19\/bombay-hc-compensation-farmers-lok-adalat-settlements\/","url_meta":{"origin":265984,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court directs State to pay compensation to farmers who entered Lok Adalat Settlements within 180 days","author":"Arunima","date":"July 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that it is the farmer's legal right to get compensation and for a person who is vested with a legal right, the demand for justice goes hand in hand.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/14\/bombay-high-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-proceedings-of-land-acquisition-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":265984,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Procedural difficulties may affect quantum of compensation, not validity of land acquisition\u2019; Bombay High Court refuses to interfere with proceedings of land acquisition","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court refused to exercise its discretionary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India keeping in view that the Bullet Train Project is an Infrastructural Project of national importance.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":328770,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/16\/bombay-hc-interim-compensation-land-acquisition-owner-uncompensated-36-years-mhada\/","url_meta":{"origin":265984,"position":5},"title":"Inside Bombay HC verdict ordering compensation to owner after 36 years since land acquisition by MHADA","author":"Editor","date":"August 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"No justification was offered for inordinate and insensitive delay and not paying any compensation for almost 36 years. Such conduct amounts to virtual expropriation of a citizen\u2019s property without the authority of law and without paying any compensation and violates Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265984\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/266001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}