{"id":265928,"date":"2022-04-26T09:00:25","date_gmt":"2022-04-26T03:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265928"},"modified":"2022-04-28T17:06:04","modified_gmt":"2022-04-28T11:36:04","slug":"suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/","title":{"rendered":"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court: <\/strong>Mangesh S. Patil, J., decided on the following questions for consideration:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Whether in a suit for partition and possession of the field all the sharers and co-partners are necessary parties?<\/li>\n<li>Whether suit for partition and possession is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties and therefore ought to have been dismissed?<\/li>\n<li>Whether in the circumstances of the case, the observation regarding non-joinder of necessary parties, made by the appellate court, are proper?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Factual Background<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A suit for partition and separate possession of the suit property was filed by respondents against the predecessor of the appellants by the name Mr Gumansing, claiming that they had 1 \/ 2 share of the suit property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was stated that the respondents were the wife and children of Harising who contested the suit by his written statement and admitted that the suit property was the ancestral property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, he had put up a plea of the previous partition about 70 years back, however, admitted that the suit property remained joint and he claimed to be the exclusive owner of the suit property and also claimed to be in possession.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Trial Court concluded that the suit property was the ancestral and joint family property but denied giving any share on the ground of non-joinder of all coparceners. Though the District Court quashed and set aside the judgment of the trial Court and decreed the suit partly.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court noted that as per the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, the suit property was simultaneously inherited by Shivam and Totaram who were real brothers and each one of them would be entitled to half share.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are the necessary parties.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, even if all the sons of Shivaram and Totaram were not covered by Order XLI Rule 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure, having found that there was due representation of both the branches and there could not have been any dispute as to equal share of each of these two branches, the interest of justice was met by decreeing the suit partly and by directing the suit property to be divided into two halves only.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench found that the District Court had not directed a further division amongst the coparceners <em>inter se<\/em> from each of the branches.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, High Court answered the substantial questions in favour of the respondents and the Second Appeal, therefore must fail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There was absolutely no evidence to show that the respondents were completely excluded from receiving any yield from the suit property and the entire usufructs were being enjoyed by the appellant to their exclusion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, civil application was disposed of. [Late Gumansing Shivram Patil v. Abhiman Gumansing Patil, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ZC1lfrtX\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Bom 866<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-4-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocate for Appellants: Mr. S.B. Yawalkar h\/f. Mr. B.R. Yawalkar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocate for Respondents1 to 5: Mr. S.V. Dixit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: Mangesh S. Patil, J., decided on the following questions for consideration: Whether in a suit for partition and possession <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":261881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34779,2518,29785,42768,49257,31853,3590,31861,32865],"class_list":["post-265928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ancestral-property","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-law","tag-legal-updates","tag-legalnews","tag-partition","tag-property","tag-suit","tag-suit-partition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Suit for Partition\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Suit for Partition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-26T03:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-28T11:36:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/\",\"name\":\"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-26T03:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-28T11:36:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Suit for Partition\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC | SCC Times","description":"Suit for Partition","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC","og_description":"Suit for Partition","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-26T03:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-04-28T11:36:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/","name":"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-26T03:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-28T11:36:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Suit for Partition","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/suit-for-partition-bombay-high-court-property\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In a suit for partition, the heads of all the branches are necessary parties: Bom HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/civil-court-jurisdiction-to-try-suit-for-title-possession-of-property-for-partition\/","url_meta":{"origin":265928,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court discusses Civil Court\u2019s jurisdiction to try suit once an application for partition is entertained by revenue authorities","author":"Editor","date":"January 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRegarding immovable properties (other than agricultural lands paying land revenue) - such as buildings, plots etc. or movable properties \u2014 where the Court can conveniently and without further enquiry make the division without the assistance of any Commissioner, or where parties agree upon the manner of division, the Court will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jurisdiction of Civil Court in parturition suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Jurisdiction-of-Civil-Court-in-parturition-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/29\/when-sc-determined-title-to-hadapsar-lands-that-remained-undivided-in-partition-of-family-property-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":265928,"position":1},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | When Supreme Court determined title to Pune\u2019s Hadapsar lands that remained undivided in partition of family property [(1952) 2 SCC 104]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court\u2019s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on partition of Hadapsar lands under Hindu law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"partition Hindu Law","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/partition-Hindu-Law.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/partition-Hindu-Law.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/partition-Hindu-Law.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/partition-Hindu-Law.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":47531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/17\/appeal-against-decree-in-partition-suit-languishing-for-30-years-heard-by-75-judges-termed-unfortunate\/","url_meta":{"origin":265928,"position":2},"title":"Appeal against decree in partition suit languishing for 30 years, heard by 75 Judges, termed unfortunate","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0 Disposing of an appeal filed in 1985 against a judgment and decree in a partition suit, the Court observed that, \u201cIt is really very unfortunate that this appeal has remained pending on the Board of this Court for almost 30 years and has to pass through hands\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/18\/partition-may-also-be-effected-under-a-settlement-or-oral-understanding-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":265928,"position":3},"title":"Partition of Property may also be effected under a settlement or an oral understanding: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no prohibition to effect a partition otherwise than through an instrument in writing by duly complying with the requirement of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"partition of property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/partition-of-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214905,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/cal-hc-grievances-ought-to-be-first-filed-in-the-competent-civil-forum-before-preferring-a-writ-petition-in-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":265928,"position":4},"title":"Cal HC | Grievances ought to be first filed in the competent civil forum, before preferring a writ petition in High Court\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner, Dr Kashninath Ghosh Hazra, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner claimed to be the owner of an un-partitioned land at plot nos. 4933, 4934, 4935 and 4936 of Mouza Sadpur, Block- Kandi,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238439,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/pat-hc-whether-transferee-pendente-lite-have-a-right-to-be-added-as-parties-to-partition-suit-court-explains-legal-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":265928,"position":5},"title":"Pat HC | Whether transferee pendente lite have a right to be added as parties to partition suit? Court explains legal position","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Mohit Kumar Shah, J., while addressing the instant partition suit decided on the question as to whether: transferee pendente lite have a right to be added as parties to the partition suit? Facts Facts pertinent to the present case were that the plaintiffs-respondents had filed a title\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265928\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}