{"id":265722,"date":"2022-04-21T14:00:14","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T08:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265722"},"modified":"2022-04-21T10:21:48","modified_gmt":"2022-04-21T04:51:48","slug":"words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: <\/strong>Biswajit Mohanty, J. dismissed the revision petition being not maintainable.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that the petitioners 1 to 8 filed a civil suit valued at Rs 49,000\/- in the Court of Civil Judge Dharamgarh for declaration of their right title and interest and confirmation of possession over the suit schedule tank along with the declaration of their right to fish, water for irrigation and improvements over the suit tank. The prayer for permanent injunction was also made against present opposite parties from interfering with the possession and ownership of the plaintiffs. The said suit was decreed. Challenging the judgment and decree, an appeal was filed making the present petitioners as respondents along with a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay. The delay condonation petition having been allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs 10,000\/- vide order dated 22-12-2021, the said order has been challenged here in this civil revision under Section 115 Civil Procedure Code i.e. CPC on ground of its maintainability.<\/p>\n

Counsel for respondents challenged the maintainability of the civil revision on the ground that the impugned order does not arise out of a out of a original suit or other original proceeding<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order passed in a petition for condonation of delay is clearly covered by the phrase \u2018other proceedings\u2019 as used in Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for short, \u201cthe Code\u201d as is presently in force in the State of Odisha pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure (Orissa Amendment) Act, 2010. He further contended that the impugned order cannot be construed as an order passed in an appeal as no appeal exists in the eyes of law unless the petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is allowed condoning the delay. Thus, the present civil revision is maintainable.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on judgments Smt. Banarasi Devi Saha v. Basudev Lal Dhanuka<\/em>, Vol. 34 (1992) O.J.D. 462 (Civil) and observed that the phrase \u2018other proceedings\u2019 occurring in Section 115 of \u201cthe Code\u201d can only mean proceedings of an original nature and the same will not cover decisions pronounced in appeals and revisions.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on judgment Vishnu Awatar V. Shiv Autar<\/em>, (1980) 4 SCC 81<\/a> and observed that the phrase \u2018other proceedings\u2019 can only mean proceedings of an original nature which are not of the nature of suits, like arbitration proceeding. This phrase cannot include decisions pronounced in appeals and revisions. The words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d. In other words the phrase \u2018other proceedings\u2019 will not cover cases arising out of decisions made in the appeals or revisions.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that while referring to the language of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1978, which is almost in pari materia with the provision of Section 115 of \u201cthe Code\u201d as in force in State of Odisha so far as the use of phrase \u201cother proceeding\u201d is concerned, the Supreme Court pronounced clearly that the decisions of the District Courts rendered in appeal or revision are beyond revisional jurisdiction<\/em> of High Court. But where original decision has been made by the District Court, the High Court\u2019s revisional power will come into play.<\/p>\n

The Court held \u201cin the present case the impugned order pertains to an order passed in connection with appeal styled as R.F.A. No. 6 of 2017, this Court is of the opinion that Civil Revision is not maintainable.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

[Kailash Chandra v. State of Orissa, C.R.P. No. 6 of 2022, decided on 30-03-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: Biswajit Mohanty, J. dismissed the revision petition being not maintainable. The facts of the case are such that the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49229,49230,46106,49228,22214],"class_list":["post-265722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-civil-procedure","tag-ejusdum-generic","tag-orissa","tag-other-proceedings","tag-s-115-cpc"],"yoast_head":"\nOri HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-21T08:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-21T08:30:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC | SCC Times","description":"Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC","og_description":"Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-21T08:30:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/","name":"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-04-21T08:30:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/21\/words-or-other-proceedings-have-to-be-read-ejusdem-generis-with-the-words-original-suits\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Words \u201cor other proceedings\u201d have to be read ejusdem generis with the words \u201coriginal suits\u201d for applicability under S. 115 CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/ori-hc-order-21-rule-29-cpc-cannot-come-to-the-rescue-unless-sufficient-cause-is-shown-to-stay-the-execution-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":265722,"position":0},"title":"Ori HC | Order 21 Rule 29 CPC cannot come to the rescue unless sufficient cause is shown to stay the execution case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the petition filed against the order which rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 29 CPC to stay the further proceeding in an execution case till the disposal of another civil suit.\u00a0 The facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/withdrawal-of-a-suit-can-be-allowed-under-order-xxiii-rule-3-of-cpc-if-the-defect-is-formal-in-nature-and-such-that-has-no-effect-on-merits-of-the-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":265722,"position":1},"title":"Withdrawal of a suit can be allowed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC if the defect is formal in nature and such that has no effect on merits of the case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of Rashid Ali Dar, J. while dealing with a civil revision petition filed against the order of trial court allowing withdrawal of suit, upheld the trial court order on the finding that there were sufficient grounds for granting leave for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":296879,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/appeal-concurrent-jurisdiction-dimissed-fails-to-comply-test-of-s-10-of-cpc-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":265722,"position":2},"title":"Appeal on concurrent jurisdiction stands dismissed, as it fails to comply the test of Section 10 of CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"If plaint filed in different courts are read juxtaposing each other it cannot be concluded that similar and identical issues are involved in both the cases.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208749,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/25\/orissa-hc-court-decides-legitimate-occasion-for-allowing-the-application-for-additional-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":265722,"position":3},"title":"Orissa HC | Court decides legitimate occasion for allowing the application for additional evidence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of District Court rejecting the application of the petitioner under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for acceptance of documents as additional evidence. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs-petitioners instituted a suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/18\/application-under-s-151-of-cpc-maintainable-despite-the-fact-that-order-allowing-the-application-under-or-7-r-11-of-cpc-is-appealable\/","url_meta":{"origin":265722,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Application under S. 151 of CPC maintainable despite the fact that order allowing the application under Or. 7 R. 11 of CPC is appealable; Trial Court directed to restore civil suit","author":"Editor","date":"May 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Dwarka Dhish Bansal, J. allowed a civil revision under Section 115 of CPC against the order rejecting application filed under Section 151 of CPC holding that the same was not maintainable. Order sheet of the trial Court showed that respondent 2 was not present when the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/orissa-hc-trial-court-must-decree-settlement-after-mediation\/","url_meta":{"origin":265722,"position":5},"title":"Once dispute is referred to mediation and settlement is reached, Trial Court cannot refuse decree: Orissa High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe disputes between the neighbours relating to the easementary rights are clearly mentioned as being suitable for mediation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Trial Court must decree settlement after mediation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-must-decree-settlement-after-mediation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-must-decree-settlement-after-mediation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-must-decree-settlement-after-mediation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-must-decree-settlement-after-mediation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}