{"id":265646,"date":"2022-04-20T13:00:48","date_gmt":"2022-04-20T07:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265646"},"modified":"2022-04-20T11:05:56","modified_gmt":"2022-04-20T05:35:56","slug":"2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In a pertinent decision, Supreme Court while rejecting claim for interest the compared it to the Shakespearean character Shylock and remarked,<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026the holder of the Bond has received their \u2018pound of flesh\u2019, but they seem to want more. Additional sum in our estimation is not merited as SIBCO has already received their just entitlement and burdening the defendant with any further amount towards\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>interest would be akin to Shylockian extraction of blood from the defendant.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

[Small Industries Development Bank of India v. SIBCO Investment (P) Ltd., (2022) 3 SCC 56<\/a>]<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Short Notes: 10<\/span><\/h4>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 12(5) r\/w Seventh Schedule and Ss. 11, 14 and 15 \u2014 Neutrality of arbitrators:<\/strong> Arbitral Tribunal comprising of the officers of one of the parties are not eligible to continue as such even when such Arbitral Tribunal stood constituted prior to 23-10-2015 i.e. prior to the Amendment Act, 2015 coming into force. Further, the earlier Arbitral Tribunal having lost its mandate cannot be permitted to continue and therefore a fresh arbitrator has to be appointed. [Ellora Paper Mills Ltd. v. State of M.P., (2022) 3 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 34 \u2014 Award in excess of claim \u2014 Non-establishment of:<\/strong> Relevance of reserving of right to furnish further details of expenditure, determined. [State of Haryana v. Shiv Shankar Construction Co., (2022) 3 SCC 109<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34(4), 31, 34(1) and 34(2-A): <\/strong>Remission of matter to arbitrator under S. 34(4) i.e. for elimination of grounds for setting aside the award cannot be permitted in absence of findings on the contentious issues. [I-Pay Clearing Services (P) Ltd. v. ICICI Bank Ltd., (2022) 3 SCC 121<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996\u2014 S. 11(6):<\/strong> Appointment of arbitrator by parties and arbitration proceedings pursuant thereto, when valid, even after filing of an application under S. 11(6), explained. Relevance of non-pursuing of such application, and filing of statement of claim by applicant before Arbitral Tribunal constituted during pendency of S. 11(6) application, determined. When settled principle of law i.e. that after an application has been filed for appointment of an arbitrator under S. 11(6), the party concerned forfeits its right to appoint an arbitrator, can be deviated from, expounded. [Durga Welding Works v. Railway Electrification, (2022) 3 SCC 98<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 41 R. 31 \u2014 First appeal \u2014 Reasons to be assigned for decision by first appellate court \u2014 Mandatory requirement of compliance with Or. 41 R. 31:<\/strong> First appellate court is mandatorily required to comply with requirements of Or. 41 R. 31 and non-observance of these requirements lead to infirmity in judgment. Appellate court’s jurisdiction involves a rehearing of appeal on questions of law as well as fact. First appeal is a valuable right, and, at that stage, all questions of fact and law decided by trial court are open for reconsideration. Judgment of appellate court must, therefore, reflect conscious application of mind and must record court’s findings, supported by reasons for its decision in respect of all issues, along with contentions put forth and pressed by parties. [Manjula v. Shyamsundar, (2022) 3 SCC 90<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 323-A and 323-B:<\/strong> Power of scrutiny of Tribunals created under this provision lies only with Division Bench of High Court within whose jurisdiction Tribunal concerned falls. [Union of India v. Alapan Bandyopadhyay, (2022) 3 SCC 133<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 \u2014 Ss. 13(1)(i-a) and (i-b): <\/strong>In this case, there was concurrent findings of courts below on cruelty and desertion and irretrievable breakdown of marriage was also taking place. Hence, it was held that no interference was called for with divorce decree. [Neha Tyagi v. Deepak Tyagi, (2022) 3 SCC 86<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (3 of 1959) \u2014 Ss. 14-B(1) and (2):<\/strong> Appeal filed before Divisional Commissioner against order passed by Collector under S. 14-B(1) declining to disqualify Sarpanch\/Member of Panchayat for allegedly failing to lodge accounts of election expenses within time and in prescribed manner, is not maintainable. Only limited window available to Divisional Commissioner under S. 14-B(2) is where Collector under S. 14-B(1) disqualifies Sarpanch\/Member of Panchayat, to remove such disqualification or to reduce period thereof in deserving cases i.e. power under S. 14-B(2) gets triggered only after order of disqualification is passed under S. 14-B(1). Further, no power of review conferred either under S. 14-B(1) or S. 14-B(2). [Shobhabai Narayan Shinde v. Commr., (2022) 3 SCC 35<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Mines and Minerals \u2014 Illegal mining \u2014 Violation of environmental law:<\/strong> Permissibility and validity of ban on mining activities by earlier Court order when mining operations conducted despite such ban based on rider or stopgap arrangement permitted by Court with regard to sand mining considering its importance in construction activities and loss to public exchequer, explained. [State of Bihar v. Pawan Kumar, (2022) 3 SCC 102<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Penal Code, 1860 \u2014 S. 304 Pt. II and S. 300 Exceptions 2 and 4: <\/strong>In this case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, there was no pre-meditation or pre-planning and incident was result of sudden quarrel in which accused exercised his right of private defence, but exceeded the limit. Hence, while confirming conviction under S. 304 Pt. II, sentence modified to 2 yrs\u2019 RI with fine of Rs 5000 and default stipulation of 3 months\u2019 RI. [Govindan v. State, (2022) 3 SCC 82<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Penal Code, 1860 \u2014 S. 498-A:<\/strong> In this case, victim immolating herself in her matrimonial home leading to her death in hospital. Concurrent findings of facts recorded by both courts below on harassment and\/or torture and\/or cruelty by appellant mother-in-law of victim, on appreciation of evidence, stand established. Therefore, appellant, held, rightly convicted under S. 498-A. [Meera v. State, (2022) 3 SCC 93<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Practice and Procedure \u2014 Delay\/Laches\/Limitation \u2014 Filing of petitions\/applications\/suits\/appeals\/all other proceedings: <\/strong>There was extension of limitation period for all proceedings before courts and tribunals due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Earlier order dt. 23-3-2020, (2020) 19 SCC 10, extending such limitation period, though was brought to an end by order dt. 8-3-2021, order dt. 23-3-2020, held, restored due to spread of the new variant of COVID-19, drastic surge in the number of COVID cases across the country and adversities faced by litigants in the prevailing conditions.\u00a0 Said restoration shall be as per directions and clarifications. [Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re, (2022) 3 SCC 117<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Practice and Procedure \u2014 State as a Litigant\/Party \u2014 Delay\/Laches\/Limitation \u2014 Unexplained delay by Revenue\/State:<\/strong> Supreme Court has already categorised these cases as \u201ccertificate cases\u201d, hence held, appeal is not maintainable under Art. 136 of the Constitution. [Commr. of Customs v. Volex Interconnect (India) (P) Ltd., (2022) 3 SCC 159<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 \u2014 S. 45-MB \u2014 RBI Circulars\/Guidelines\/Directions:<\/strong> For \u201cpublic interest\u201d RBI is empowered to issue any directive to any banking institution, and to prohibit alienation of an NBFC’s property. Further, RBI has wide supervisory powers over financial institutions like SIDBI (defendant), in furtherance of which, any direction issued by RBI, deriving power from the RBI Act or the Banking Regulation Act is statutorily binding on the defendant. [Small Industries Development Bank of India v. SIBCO Investment (P) Ltd., (2022) 3 SCC 56<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Service Law \u2014 Departmental Enquiry \u2014 Employee’s right of representation \u2014 Right to be represented by counsel of one’s choice \u2014 Extent of:<\/strong> There is no absolute right in favour of delinquent officer to be represented by counsel of his choice in departmental proceedings and same can be restricted by employer. Only requirement is that delinquent officer must get fair opportunity to represent his case. [Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank v. Ramesh Chandra Meena, (2022) 3 SCC 44<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Specific Relief Act, 1963 \u2014 S. 19(b): Suit for specific performance against whom not enforceable:<\/strong> Specific performance, held, cannot be enforced against such purchaser or their transferees as they would fall within exception of transferee for value who had paid money in good faith and without notice of original contract. [Seethakathi Trust Madras v. Krishnaveni, (2022) 3 SCC 150<\/a>]<\/p>\n

U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (1 of 1961) \u2014 Ss. 3(17) and 3(9) \u2014 Sub-lessee of original government lessee:<\/strong> Sub-lessees of original government lessees are merely ostensible tenure-holders of land, while government lessees continued to be original holders i.e. land in question is merely held by sub-lessee on behalf of original lessees. Terms of original government lease deed though provide for sub-lease for agricultural purposes but sub-lessees cannot claim independent tenancy rights unless stipulations therefor in the government lease and the sub-lease have been complied with. [Hardev Singh v. Prescribed Authority, (2022) 3 SCC 21<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a pertinent decision, Supreme Court while rejecting claim for interest the compared it to the Shakespearean character Shylock and remarked, \u201c\u2026the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":249204,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[4751,26884,42768,11411],"class_list":["post-265646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-scc","tag-cases-reported","tag-legal-updates","tag-supreme-court-cases"],"yoast_head":"\n2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-20T07:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/\",\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-20T07:30:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times","description":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1","og_description":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-20T07:30:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/","name":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-20T07:30:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/20\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-1-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/23\/shylock-has-received-their-promised-pound-of-flesh-but-they-seem-to-want-more-bank-entitled-to-withhold-payment-where-bond-holders-title-is-clouded-as-fraudulent-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":265646,"position":0},"title":"\u201cShylock has received their promised pound of flesh but they seem to want more\u201d; Bank entitled to withhold payment where Bond holder\u2019s title is clouded as fraudulent: SC","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy* and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ., while deciding on an appeal challenging dismissal of suit by the Calcutta High Court restored the Trial Court's judgement which was reversed by the High Court. Factual Backdrop The suit was filed by SIBCO Investment seeking interest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Shylock-has-received-their-promised-pound-of-flesh-but-they-seem-to-want-more-Bank-entitled-to-withhold-payment-where-Bond-holders-title-is-clouded-as-fraudulent.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Shylock-has-received-their-promised-pound-of-flesh-but-they-seem-to-want-more-Bank-entitled-to-withhold-payment-where-Bond-holders-title-is-clouded-as-fraudulent.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Shylock-has-received-their-promised-pound-of-flesh-but-they-seem-to-want-more-Bank-entitled-to-withhold-payment-where-Bond-holders-title-is-clouded-as-fraudulent.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Shylock-has-received-their-promised-pound-of-flesh-but-they-seem-to-want-more-Bank-entitled-to-withhold-payment-where-Bond-holders-title-is-clouded-as-fraudulent.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Shylock-has-received-their-promised-pound-of-flesh-but-they-seem-to-want-more-Bank-entitled-to-withhold-payment-where-Bond-holders-title-is-clouded-as-fraudulent.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266015,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-3-supreme-court-cases-cases-reported\/","url_meta":{"origin":265646,"position":1},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 3","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In this Part, read a very interesting Supreme Court decision, held that, wherein the amounts paid by resident Indian end-users\/distributors to non-resident computer software manufacturers\/suppliers, as consideration for the resale\/use of the computer software through EULAs\/distribution agreements, is not the payment of royalty for the use of copyright in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298714,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/06\/co-sharer-disposes-joint-property-and-appropriates-sale-proceeds-will-be-accountable-for-money-to-other-co-sharers-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":265646,"position":2},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | When a co-sharer in possession of a joint estate disposes of entire property and appropriates sale proceeds, he will be accountable for money to other co-sharers [1951 SCC 122]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1951 on Transfer of Property Act, 1882.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"joint estate co-sharer immovable property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/joint-estate-co-sharer-immovable-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/joint-estate-co-sharer-immovable-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/joint-estate-co-sharer-immovable-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/joint-estate-co-sharer-immovable-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/2022-scc-vol-4-part-1-scc-supreme-court-cases-cases-reported\/","url_meta":{"origin":265646,"position":3},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 4 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2022 SCC Volume 4 Part 1, read a very interesting case, wherein the grievance of the builder was that out of total of 1134 apartments constructed and sold by them, the owners of merely 51 apartments have joined together and invoked the jurisdiction of the National Consumer Commission and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203460,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/2018-scc-vol-8-october-14-2018-part-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":265646,"position":4},"title":"2018 SCC Vol. 8 October 14, 2018 Part 5","author":"Saba","date":"October 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitution of India \u2014 Arts. 239-AA and 145(3) \u2014 Interpretation of Art. 239-AA: Appeals on the matter need to be heard by a Constitution Bench as these matters involve substantial questions of law as to the interpretation of Art. 239-AA. Registry directed to place papers before Chief Justice for constituting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/26\/2022-scc-vol-3-part-2-cases-reported-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":265646,"position":5},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 3 Part 2","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2022 SCC Volume 3 Part 2, read a very interesting case wherein a case where a Constable\u2019s name was recommended by the Superintendent of Police but the same was dropped down by the Inspector General of Police for promotion under the 10% quota of outstanding performance for inclusion in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SCC_Standard.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265646\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/249204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}