{"id":265427,"date":"2022-04-15T11:00:49","date_gmt":"2022-04-15T05:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265427"},"modified":"2022-04-20T18:08:08","modified_gmt":"2022-04-20T12:38:08","slug":"arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/","title":{"rendered":"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&#038;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Vibhu Bakhru, J., held that whether claims are barred by limitation is a mixed question of fact and law and is required to be examined by the Arbitral Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner (PDL) had filed the instant petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying that an arbitrator can be appointed on behalf of the respondent (FRL).<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Factual Background<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PDL had entered into an agreement with the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited, whereby a specified area on the ground and first floor within the Station Box was allocated for constructing a shopping complex under the name and style of \u2018Parsvnath Mall\u2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PDL was given the right to sub-license the use of the facility for the period of the agreement and for the uses specified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thereafter, PDL and FRL entered into a sub-license agreement (Contract) wherein two units on the ground and first floors were agreed to be sub-licensed to FRL for running a departmental store under the name of \u2018Big Bazaar\u2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During the subsistence of the Contract, in the year 2007, the Government of India enacted the Finance Act, 2007 by virtue of which the service of renting\/licensing immovable properties for commercial use was included as a taxable service and brought under the nest of service tax. Consequently, the licensing of the premises to FRL under the Contract was a taxable service.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PDL claimed that FRL was liable to bear the additional burden of service tax; however, FRL had failed to reimburse the service tax.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">FRL submitted that no stipulation was contained in the Contract for payment of service tax.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the petition for the appointment of an arbitrator required to be rejected on the ground that the main agreement is insufficiently stamped?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court observed that, an arbitration agreement, even though embodied in a main agreement, is a separate agreement and invalidation of the main agreement does not necessarily invalidate the arbitration agreement.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">An arbitration agreement is not required to be compulsorily registered.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the doctrine of severability, denying the benefit of an arbitration agreement to a party on the ground of any deficiency in the main agreement, may not be apposite.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Well Settled Law<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">By virtue of Section 11(6A) of the A&amp;C Act, the scope of examination under Section 11 of the A&amp;C Act is confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench observed that, in cases where there is no vestige of doubt that the claims are not arbitrable or the agreement is invalid, the Courts may decline to refer the parties to arbitration but not in any other case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Supreme Court\u2019s decision in <em>NCC Ltd. v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd., <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/IbCrScoW\">2019 SCC OnLine Del 6964<\/a>, was also referred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court opined that it would be apposite for this Court to adjudicate the issue of whether PDL\u2019s claims were barred by limitation, the same shall be decided by an Arbitral Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PDL had nominated Mr S.C. Jain, Additional District Judge (Retired) as its nominated Arbitrator. Accordingly, Mr Laxmi Kant Gaur, District Judge (Retired), is appointed as FRL\u2019s nominated Arbitrator. Further, it was stated that both the arbitrators shall appoint the third arbitrator for the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petition was allowed under the above terms. [Parsvnath Developers Ltd. v. Future Retail Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jOAcPmI9\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Del 1017<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-4-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Petitioner: Mr Rahul Malhotra and Mr Rishu Kant Sharma, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondent: Mr Sudhir K. Makkar, Senior Advocate with Ms Saumya Gupta, Ms Veera Mathai, Ms Yogita Rathore, Advocates.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., held that whether claims are barred by limitation is a mixed question of fact and law <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":260899,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35672,3226,17711,3174],"class_list":["post-265427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitral-tribunal","tag-arbitration","tag-arbitrator","tag-contract"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&amp;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Scope of examination under Section 11 of A&amp;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&amp;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scope of examination under Section 11 of A&amp;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-15T05:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-20T12:38:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/\",\"name\":\"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-15T05:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-20T12:38:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Scope of examination under Section 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&#038;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses | SCC Times","description":"Scope of examination under Section 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses","og_description":"Scope of examination under Section 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-15T05:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-04-20T12:38:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/","name":"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-15T05:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-20T12:38:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Scope of examination under Section 11 of A&C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/15\/arbitration-agreement-stamp-duty-arbitrator\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Scope of examination under S. 11 of A&#038;C Act is confined to existence of arbitration agreement or does it extend to adjudicating nature of contract as well? Del HC addresses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":161584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/04\/court-can-appoint-arbitrator-under-s-116-of-the-ac-act-if-those-nominated-by-parities-decline-to-act-as-such\/","url_meta":{"origin":265427,"position":0},"title":"Court can appoint Arbitrator under S. 11(6) of the A&#038;C Act if those nominated by parties decline to act as such","author":"Saba","date":"October 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a petition filed under S. 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint an Arbitral Tribunal, a Single Judge Bench of A.S. Bopanna, J. held that since the process of constitution of Arbitral Tribunal as decided by the parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":317817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/delhi-hc-non-signatory-guarantor-to-be-impleaded-as-party-is-for-arbitral-tribunal-to-decide-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":265427,"position":1},"title":"Issue of non-signatory guarantor to be impleaded as party to arbitration is for arbitral tribunal to decide: Delhi High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"March 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPrima facie, Respondents 3-5 are a veritable party to the loan agreement as they are connected with the loan documents and form part of the loan transaction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/delhi-hc-on-validity-of-unilateral-appointment-of-sole-arbitrator\/","url_meta":{"origin":265427,"position":2},"title":"&#8216;Letter consenting to unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator doesn&#8217;t constitute waiver under Sec. 12 (5) of Arbitration Act&#8217;: Delhi HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAt best, the letter consenting to appointment of sole arbitrator, was a conditional acceptance of the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The condition being that the sole arbitrator would adjudicate the disputes between the petitioner and both the respondents.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/unilateral-appointment-of-sole-arbitrator.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/unilateral-appointment-of-sole-arbitrator.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/unilateral-appointment-of-sole-arbitrator.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/unilateral-appointment-of-sole-arbitrator.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/arbitration-round-up-june-2024-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":265427,"position":3},"title":"Arbitration Roundup June 2024; Update yourself with all the latest Arbitration law updates in June 2024","author":"Editor","date":"July 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA quick recap of the latest rulings by the Supreme Court and High Courts- From the mandate of the arbitrator to the challenge of award passed by arbitrator\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Arbitration laws June 2024","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Latest-Arbitration-laws-June-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Latest-Arbitration-laws-June-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Latest-Arbitration-laws-June-2024.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Latest-Arbitration-laws-June-2024.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-hc-appoints-arbitrator-resolve-dispute-between-yuvraj-singh-and-real-estate-developer\/","url_meta":{"origin":265427,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Necessary ingredients of Sec. 11(6) clearly exist\u2019; Delhi HC appoints Arbitrator to resolve dispute between Yuvraj Singh and real estate developer for claim of Rs. 1.38 Crores","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDeletion of party is an issue to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, it cannot be looked into by the Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/madras-hc-arbitral-tribunal-cannot-lift-corporate-veil\/","url_meta":{"origin":265427,"position":5},"title":"Arbitral Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to lift corporate veil: Madras High Court modifies arbitral award","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cArbitrator went wrong in applying the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil\/ determining another entity as the alter ego and fastening the liability on the petitioner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitral Tribunal cannot lift corporate veil","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Arbitral-Tribunal-cannot-lift-corporate-veil.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Arbitral-Tribunal-cannot-lift-corporate-veil.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Arbitral-Tribunal-cannot-lift-corporate-veil.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Arbitral-Tribunal-cannot-lift-corporate-veil.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265427\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/260899"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}