{"id":265383,"date":"2022-04-13T13:00:17","date_gmt":"2022-04-13T07:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265383"},"modified":"2022-04-15T14:51:21","modified_gmt":"2022-04-15T09:21:21","slug":"daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/strong> Narendra Kumar Vyas, J. allowed an appeal filed by the defendants setting aside the judgment and decree by the Trial Court whereby trial Court had decreed the suit filed by plaintiff\/respondent 1, dismissed the counter claim filed by appellants\/defendants 1 to 3.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellants\/defendants are all residents of Bilaspur. The suit land already described by this Court was the self acquired property of mother of defendants and plaintiff. Her name was recorded as title holder of the suit land. It was pleaded that plaintiff has taken care of his mother till his lifetime, all the last rituals have been performed by him and due to care taken by him she bequeathed a Will in favour of the plaintiff on 28-10-2010 and since then plaintiff was in possession of the suit land. After her death the plaintiff moved an application for mutation of the suit land in his name being successor per Will dated 28-10-2010 executed by her. The name of plaintiff has been mutated in the revenue record as the land owner on 10-09-2013. The defendants 1 to 3 had preferred an appeal wherein they had raised an objection that the plaintiff was not only successor of her and they were also the successor, as such their names should also have\u00a0 been recorded in the revenue record.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The illegal interference of the appellants\/defendants in the title and ownership of the suit land which is owned by the plaintiff necessitated the plaintiff to file present suit for declaration and for grant of permanent injunction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Defendants filed their written statement denying the averments made in the plaint contending that the Will dated 28-10-2010 was forged one, as such, on the basis of forged document, order of mutation was illegal and against the provisions of law, therefore, order dated 10-09-2013 was not binding upon them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">From the factual matrix the Court identified two main issues:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(i) Whether the will has been proved as per the provisions of section 68 of the Evidence Act and Section 63 (c) of the Indian Succession Act?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(ii) Whether the defendants are entitled to get equal share of the suit land being coparcener as per Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">From analysis of the evidence and considering the evidence they have nowhere stated that will has been written as per the direction of the testatrix and also considering the fact that the witnesses have nowhere stated in their evidence that the testatrix has put her signature on the will in their presence. therefore, doubtful circumstances establish with regard to existence of will. Also, application which was filed before Revenue Court for mutation wherein the defendants have not made party despite aware of the facts that sisters are still surviving, it certainly creates doubt over genuineness of the will.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For deciding issue 1 the\u00a0 Court considered the judgment of the Supreme Court in <em>Murthy v. C. Saradambal<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5pR56wX6\">(2022) 3 SCC 209<\/a> and stated that it is crystal clear, that <strong>the validity of Will was not proved in accordance with the provisions of the law and suspicious circumstances are available on record which<\/strong> <strong>have not been cleared by the plaintiff by placing material on record<\/strong>, therefore, judgment and decree so far as holding that the plaintiff was the owner of the suit was set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Issue 2 the Court extracted provisions of section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as amended in 2005 and explained that since the plaintiff and defendants are coparcener of the joint Hindu family property, as per Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, <strong>the daughters were also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents<\/strong>. The suit land was inherited by deceased mother, as such defendants and plaintiff were entitled to get equal share in the property as per Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005. The Court relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in <em>Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7XYuM33k\">(2020) 9 SCC 1<\/a> and decided that plaintiff and defendants were entitled to get \u00bc shares in the suit property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the appellants\/defendants had also filed application under Order 41 Rule 27 Read with Section 151 of the CPC for taking additional document on record by stating that during pendency of the appeal, the appellants\/ defendants have filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC by which the respondent No.1 has sold total 10 decimal of the land in favour of respondent\/plaintiff 3 , therefore, he was arrayed as party to the case. While allowing this application the Court held that sale of land shall also be subject to the decision of this appeal and the <strong>land already sold to respondent 3, if it is part of suit land then .040 hectare land will be adjusted\/ reduced from the share of plaintiff.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counter claim and appeal filed by the defendants was allowed and it was held that defendant 1-3 were entitled to get equal share in the property as per Hindu Succession Act, as amended in 2005.[Sonia Bai v. Dashrath Sahu, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Zs9i4cCx\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Chh 468<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-02-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Applicants : Mr Aman Sharma<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondent 1 : Mr Dhirendra Mishra<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the State : Mr Sameer Sharma, Dy. GA<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondent 4. : Mr Dashrath Prajapati<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0Chhattisgarh High Court: Narendra Kumar Vyas, J. allowed an appeal filed by the defendants setting aside the judgment and decree by the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31318,49160,30456,3590],"class_list":["post-265383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-daughter","tag-hindu-succession-act-2005","tag-land","tag-property"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-13T07:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-15T09:21:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-13T07:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-15T09:21:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will | SCC Times","description":"Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will","og_description":"Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-13T07:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-04-15T09:21:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/","name":"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-04-13T07:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-15T09:21:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/13\/daughters-also-entitled-for-getting-equal-share-in-the-property-inherited-by-their-parents\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | Daughters also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents; Court reiterates and allows appeal deciding validity of will"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222574,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/","url_meta":{"origin":265383,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.C. Gupte, J., while allowing a second appeal filed by the plaintiff against the order of the first Appellate court, held that the suit filed for protecting the possession of immovable property based on settled exclusive possession cannot be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff has failed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270781,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-co-owners-of-the-joint-property-cannot-prevent-each-other-from-using-the-property-appeal-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":265383,"position":1},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Co-owners of the joint property cannot prevent each other from using the property; appeal dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., while dismissing the appeal preferred by the plaintiff against the judgments passed by the trial court and the appellate court held that when a suit land is not partitioned and the parties to the suit are the co-sharers and co-owners,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/principles-for-applicability-res-judicata-among-co-defendants-re-iterated-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":265383,"position":2},"title":"Principles for applicability \u201cres judicata among co-defendants\u201d re-iterated: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana and M.M. Shantanagoudar, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of Madras High Court whereby it allowed a letters patent appeal filed by the plaintiff in a partition suit. The plaintiff filed a suit in regard to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/provisions-of-dv-act-cannot-be-used-as-a-ploy-by-son\/","url_meta":{"origin":265383,"position":3},"title":"Provisions of DV Act cannot be used as a ploy by son, to either claim a right in his father\u2019s property or continue to retain possession of father\u2019s property, on strength of his wife\u2019s right of residence: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J. while addressing the matter, expressed that \u201c\u2026in the opinion of this Court, all cases of family disputes cannot be characterised as cases under the DV Act.\u201d Plaintiff had filed a suit against his son and daughter-in-law, respectively. In view of various disputes between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/19\/ori-hc-admission-of-only-some-facts-would-not-qualify-defendants-the-right-to-begin-first-under-or-18-r-1-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":265383,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC | Admission of only some facts would not qualify defendants the right to begin first under Or. 18 R. 1 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the present petition and quashed an order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) directing the plaintiffs to begin first due to the defendants only admitting some of the facts alleged. In the present case, the possession of the suit property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/hp-hc-provision-to-issue-a-commission-to-make-local-investigation-is-not-a-tool-to-create-evidence-in-favor-of-parties-order-made-under-or-26-r-9-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":265383,"position":5},"title":"HP HC | Provision to \u2018issue a Commission to make local investigation\u2019 is not a tool to create evidence in favor of parties; order made under Or. 26 R. 9 set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel, J. entertained a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, where the petitioner had challenged the order passed by the Civil Judge, where the application for appointment of a Revenue Officer as a Local Commissioner under Order 26 Rule\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265383\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}