{"id":265328,"date":"2022-04-12T17:00:37","date_gmt":"2022-04-12T11:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265328"},"modified":"2022-05-26T14:49:45","modified_gmt":"2022-05-26T09:19:45","slug":"coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court: <\/strong>N. Anand Venkatesh, J., addressed a matter with regard to coparcenary rights of sons and daughters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Plaintiff had sought for relief of partition and for allotment of 1\/5<sup>th<\/sup> share in the suit property and also sought for declaration of the sale deed executed by the 1<sup>st<\/sup> defendant in favour of the 5<sup>th<\/sup> defendant as null and void.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Plaintiff\u2019s case was that the suit property formed part of a larger extent of property which was ancestral in nature. It was claimed that 1<sup>st<\/sup> defendant father and defendants 2 to 4 who were the sisters of the plaintiff were each entitled 1\/5<sup>th<\/sup> share in the suit property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The grievance of the plaintiff was that the 1st defendant went ahead and sold an extent of 36 cents in favour of the 5th defendant through a sale deed and according to the plaintiff, this sale deed was null and void and not binding on the other sharers. Further, the 1stdefendnat was not coming forward to allot the shares to the other legal heirs and hence, the suit came to be filed seeking for the reliefs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1<sup>st<\/sup> defendant submitted that he was the absolute owner of the property during his life time and plaintiff cannot claim any share in the property.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court noted that the source of the property was admitted to be ancestral.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Main Issue<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nature of inheritance made by the three sons of Thalaivirichan Reddy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench expressed that, even after the Joint Family properties are partitioned and allotted to each sharer, the same can be held to be the individual property of the sharer only till a son and\/or daughter are born. Once a son and\/or daughter is born, they will get a right and share over the property by birth. As rightly held in the above judgment, the 1956 Act has not put to an end the co-parcenary rights and infact, it continues to be reiterated after the coming into force of the 2005 amendment Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the Court expressed that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Even if there was a family arrangement between the three sons of Kathavaraya Reddy and by virtue of the same, the 1st defendant had allotted 1.07 acres, the moment the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 4 were born, they will also be entitled for a share in the property.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In High Court\u2019s opinion, lower Courts had lost the sight of law governing the property and had erroneously concluded that the property in the hands of 1<sup>st<\/sup> defendant was his exclusive property and that daughters will not be entitled to claim a share in the property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is nobody&#8217;s case that the 1st defendant had sold the property and had utilized the money for illegal purposes. Therefore, the assumption should be that it was utilized by the 1st defendant for the family.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u201c\u2026this Court must also safeguard the rights of the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 4 to the extent possible and ensure that they get a reasonable share in the suit property. This is the only way to balance the rights of the daughters and the father in the suit property.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court added that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The manner in which the property is going to be distributed by balancing the equities can be decided by the Trial Court at the time of passing the final decree.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the second appeal was partly allowed granting 1\/4<sup>th<\/sup> share to the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 4 in the property that remained after the extent that had already been sold in favor of 5<sup>th<\/sup> respondent. [S. Sampoomam v. C.K. Shanmugam, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/J8c7FXwN\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Mad 1594<\/b><\/a>, decided on 5-4-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Appellant: Mr.A.Gouthaman<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondents: Mr.R.Rajarajan for R1 to R5<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., addressed a matter with regard to coparcenary rights of sons and daughters. Plaintiff had sought <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":261884,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31318,17091,3590,49132,45417],"class_list":["post-265328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-daughter","tag-hindu-succession-act","tag-property","tag-rights-of-copracener","tag-son"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-12T11:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-26T09:19:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/\",\"name\":\"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-12T11:30:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-26T09:19:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"Madras High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light | SCC Times","description":"Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light","og_description":"Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-12T11:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-26T09:19:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","name":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-12T11:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-26T09:19:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"Madras High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/10\/ancestral-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":265328,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Under Hindu Succession Act, can an \u2018ancestral property\u2019 blend in with the \u2018individual property\u2019? Read to know","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G. Jaya Chandran, J., expressed that the individual property can blend with the ancestral property or with the joint family property but not vice versa. Factual Matrix In the present matter, it has been stated that the parties engaged in the dispute were descendants of K.N.T Manickam\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258327,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/10\/daughter-of-a-coparcener-will-also-be-a-coparcener-in-hindu-undivided-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":265328,"position":1},"title":"Daughter of a coparcener will also be a coparcener in Hindu Undivided Property? Tis Hazari Courts decides where father died before coming into force of 2005 Amendment to S. 6","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi: Kirandeep Kaur, Civil Judge \u2013 05, discussed the legal position on a coparcener's daughter also being a coparcener of the Hindu Undivided Property. Factual Matrix The plaintiffs were the lineal descendant of Sunder Lal who died intestate. He was the owner of a property and after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/madras-hc-daughter-entitled-to-half-share-in-ancestral-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":265328,"position":2},"title":"Sale deed not binding: Madras HC holds daughter entitled to half share in ancestral property under Hindu Succession Act","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because Patta and Kist Receipts stand in the name of defendant, and because the plaintiff did not raise any objection for the same, the presumption of joint possession of a co-owner cannot be dislodged\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"daughter entitled to half share","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323213,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/dhc-denies-widowed-daughter-in-law-share-in-property-of-mother-in-law-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":265328,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Section 15(1) of Hindu Succession Act an anomaly in legislation that requires rectification\u2019; Delhi HC denies widowed daughter-in-law a share in mother-in-law&#8217;s property","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that this case is demonstrative of how S. 15(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 works against a woman.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/","url_meta":{"origin":265328,"position":4},"title":"[Succession] Madras HC | &#8220;Stale claim resurrected for some other reason&#8221;: Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0R. Subramanian, J., dismissed the second appeal filed in regard to suit for partition and granting possession of share to a daughter as coparcener on finding no substantial question of law. In the instant second appeal, plaintiffs are aggrieved by the dismissal of their suit for partition and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/10\/daughters-as-coparceners\/","url_meta":{"origin":265328,"position":5},"title":"Daughters as Co-parceners | S. 6 of Hindu Succession Act prevails over S. 29-A inserted by Maharashtra Amendment; wasn&#8217;t necessary for Parliament to repeal S. 29-A: Bom HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad: Vibha Kankanwadi, J., while addressing a matter revolving around the property, observed that, Article 254 of the Constitution gets attracted only when both Central and State legislations have been enacted on any of the matters in the said List and there is conflict between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265328\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}