{"id":265036,"date":"2022-04-05T14:00:28","date_gmt":"2022-04-05T08:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=265036"},"modified":"2022-04-08T13:19:40","modified_gmt":"2022-04-08T07:49:40","slug":"chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Chhattisgarh High Court: <\/strong>Rajani Dubey, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are that a tractor and trolley was found carrying illegal timber woods in Tamor Pingla Sanctuary Area, Sarguja Forest Circle, Ambikapur. The said vehicle was driven by driver and the owner of the vehicle was also present. After interrogation by the Forest Officer, an offence punishable under Sections 27, 29, 31, 50 &amp; 52 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 26 (1) (e) (f) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was registered against the driver and owner of the said and thereafter the said vehicle including timbers was seized. Thereafter, show cause notice was given regarding confiscation of the vehicle and finding the reply unsatisfactory, confiscation order was passed. Against the said order of confiscation, the petitioner filed appeal before the respondent 2, which was dismissed, against which the petitioner filed criminal revision before the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, District Sarguja which too was dismissed. Hence, present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the accused persons have been acquitted by the Criminal Court, thus no offence has been proved against the petitioner and therefore the proceeding of confiscation of the vehicle is illegal and arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that a bare reading of Section 52, Indian Forest Act, 1927 makes it clear that Forest Officer has power to confiscate the vehicle and the Competent Authority after giving show cause notice to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the \u00a0ASJ in the impugned order clearly held that criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously and once the information of confiscation proceeding under Section 52 (e) of the Indian Forest Act is given to the District Magistrate, then the Trial Magistrate has no power regarding confiscated vehicle of being released, disposed etc. and it has been further held that the information of confiscation proceeding was already given to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambikapur and the accused were given ample opportunity of being heard and only thereafter the orders were passed and thereby dismissed the criminal revision of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held <em>\u201cthe finding of the learned ASJ that the criminal trial and confiscation proceeding are different proceedings and they may run simultaneously and even after acquittal of the accused persons, the vehicle was found to be involved in transportation of illegal timbers and the same was liable to be confiscated and the accused were given ample opportunity of being heard, is based on proper appreciation of provisions of law and facts as well, which cannot be interfered with by this Court.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Gend Lal Kushwaha v. State of Chhattisgarh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4jD6Ene3\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Chh 617<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-04-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajani Dubey, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that a tractor <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[49068,35786,49069,16121,3183,49067,45587,37054,43165],"class_list":["post-265036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-chattisgarh","tag-confiscation","tag-confiscation-proceeding","tag-district-magistrate","tag-Forest","tag-illegal-timber","tag-indian-forest-act","tag-timber","tag-wildlife-protection-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajani Dubey, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that a tractor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-05T08:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-08T07:49:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-05T08:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-08T07:49:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajani Dubey, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that a tractor","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-05T08:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-04-08T07:49:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","name":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-04-05T08:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-08T07:49:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":343840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":265036,"position":0},"title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no bar under Section 52 of Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/21\/confiscation-of-truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":265036,"position":1},"title":"Confiscation of Truck loaded with cow progeny despite acquittal in criminal proceedings amounts to arbitrary deprivation of property\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the District Magistrate had directed confiscation of a Truck under the M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 despite the criminal proceedings having culminated into acquittal, the bench of KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy*, JJ has held that in a case where the offender\/accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246397,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/02\/indian-forest-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":265036,"position":2},"title":"Tri HC | Conviction under S. 42 Indian Forest Act, 1927 upheld; Court dismisses petition  \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"April 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., dismissed a criminal revision petition which had been filed challenging the judgment delivered by the Sessions Judge in which the Judge had affirmed the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate convicting the petitioner under Section 42 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/09\/confiscation-order-can-only-be-challenged-when-it-reaches-its-finality-and-the-statute-does-not-give-any-space-to-challenge-chhattisgarh-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":265036,"position":3},"title":"[Excise Act] Chh HC | Confiscation order can only be challenged when it reaches its finality and the statute does not give any space to challenge any other order except the final one","author":"Editor","date":"May 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Goutam Bhaduri, J., allowed the petition and directed the vehicle to be released on certain conditions.\u00a0 The brief facts of this case are that on receiving information, a vehicle was intercepted and from the vehicle illicit liquor to the extent of 34.54 bulk litres was seized. Thus,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/10\/jhar-hc-s-2-of-forest-conservation-act-1980-not-a-penal-provision-conviction-thereunder-not-sustainable-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":265036,"position":4},"title":"Jhar HC | S. 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 not a penal provision \u2013 conviction thereunder not sustainable in law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. disposed of a revision petition, filed against the judgment of the trial court, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for simple imprisonment for six months for offences punishable under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 but it did not pass\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":325919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/rajasthan-high-court-asks-state-to-consider-providing-statutory-remedy-of-appeal-revision-against-section-6-a-rajasthan-bovine-animal-acts-orders-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":265036,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court asks State to consider providing statutory remedy of Appeal\/Revision against Section 6-A Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act\u2019s orders","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that the High Court\u2019s inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC do not extend to interfering with orders of the District Collector acting under Section 6-A of the RBA Act in a quasi-judicial capacity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265036\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}