{"id":264911,"date":"2022-04-02T10:00:11","date_gmt":"2022-04-02T04:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=264911"},"modified":"2022-04-05T19:16:31","modified_gmt":"2022-04-05T13:46:31","slug":"legal-roundup-of-high-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/02\/legal-roundup-of-high-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"112 Reports from 22 High Courts: Hijab Ban, Son’s Right on Parent’s Property, Right of Putative Father, Live-in Relationships and more| March RoundUp 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

112 significant Reports from 22 High Courts<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Allahabad High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Right to Reputation<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

People using cyberspace to vent out anger and frustration by travestying key-figures holding highest office in country, is abhorrent and violates right to reputation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sanjay Kumar Singh, J., expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe internet and social media has become an important tool through which individuals can exercise their right to freedom of expression but the right to freedom of expression comes with its own set of special responsibilities and duties.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Corruption<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Corruption is a termite in every system; a root cause of all problems but has to be put to account<\/strong><\/p>\n

While expressing that medical and legal fields are more a service than a profession especially the stream of oncology which deals with life and death, Krishan Pahal, J., held that \u201cCorruption is a termite in every system.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Andhra Pradesh High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Bail<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u201d\u2026being an educated man and Software Engineer, he is not justified in making such irresponsible comments against the Judiciary and the High Court\u201d, Bail denied<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cheekathi Manavendranath Roy J. dismissed the criminal petition and granted bail to the accused advocates and denied bail to accused software engineer.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Reckless Driving<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

In the case of reckless driving, injured party will have to always prove that either side was negligent?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ., while addressing a case of negligent driving, expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026if the injury rather death is caused by something owned or controlled by the negligent party then he is directly liable.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Evidence<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Prosecution must stand on its own legs basing its findings on the evidence that has been led by it<\/strong><\/p>\n

Siddhartha Varma, J., held that it is the bounden duty of the enquiry officer to have seen whether the charges were proved on the basis of the evidence which was led by it.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Bombay High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Nomination of a Councillor<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can a nominated Councillor be appointed as Leader of the House under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe term \u2018elected Councillor\u2019 in Section 19-1A would necessarily have to be read as an exclusion and bar to any other Councillor i.e \u2018nominated Councillor\u2019 to become the Leader of the House.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Negligence<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

When a person suffers injury without any negligence on his part, but result of combined effect of negligence of two other persons: Is it a case of composite or contributory negligence?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Expressing that, Negligence does not always mean absolute carelessness, but want of such a degree of care as required in particular circumstances,\u00a0Vinay Joshi, J., held that no absolute standard can be fixed as to what constitutes negligence differs from case to case.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

License<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

To operate in State of Maharashtra, Uber and other unlicensed aggregators to apply for license before 16th March 2022<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ and Vinay Joshi, J., directed UBER and other transport aggregators who have not obtained a license as per Section 93(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act to apply for the license before 16th<\/sup>\u00a0March 2022 otherwise they shall not be able to operate in the State of Maharashtra.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

State Quota<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

If an aspirant has not completed her 10th and 12th standard from State of Maharashtra, can she still be covered under State Quota of Maharashtra for M.B.B.S?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and S.G. Dige, JJ., addressed a matter wherein an aspirant of M.B.B.S Course approached the Court praying that the petitioner be considered in State Quota from NRI Quota.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

IBC<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can Additional Sessions Judge or Sessions Judge try offences under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sandeep K. Shinde, J., held that Special Court which is to try offences under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is the Special Court established under Section 436(2) (b) of the Companies Act, 2013 which consisted of Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate First Class.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Parent\u2019s Property<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

When parents are alive, can a son claim his share in the property of his parents?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of G.S. Patel and Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ., held that Asif i.e. son has no rights in his father\u2019s flats.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Film \u201883\u2019<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

No stay on OTT Release of film \u201883\u2019: Bom HC | Netflix and Star India already have antecedent rights, both digital and satellite for 10 years<\/strong><\/p>\n

While refusing to restrain Star India and Netflix from streaming the film \u201883\u2019 on their respective broadcasting portals, R.I. Chagla, J., observed that, prospective owner of copyright in a future work may also assign to any person the copyright in the future work.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Child in Conflict<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

When a Child in Conflict with Law is to be tried as an adult, an assessment under S. 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is required to be done?<\/strong><\/p>\n

M.G. Sewlikar, J., held that, in terms of Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Juvenile Justice Board has to make assessment into heinous offences to determine whether CCL is to be tried as an adult.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Currency Notes<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can Currency Notes in police custody pre-demonetisation, be replaced with current valid tender?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of G.S. Patel and Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ., addressed a matter concerning currency notes pre-demonetisation and their replacement with current valid tender.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Karta<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Daughters and widow of a deceased would inherit properties of deceased as tenants in common or joint tenants?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mangesh S. Patil, J., expressed that, by virtue of Section 19 it has been explicitly made clear that if two and more heirs succeed together to the property and in the estate, they take the property as tenants in common and not as joint tenants.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Calcutta High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Rape<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Penetration even of the slightest degree is necessary to establish the offence of rape; Court modifies order after 8 years of imprisonment<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cIt is settled law penetration even of the slightest degree is necessary to establish the offence of rape.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Tax<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

No intention of any evasion of tax; Court directs refund of penalty and tax paid on protest<\/strong><\/p>\n

Md. Nizamuddin, J. decided on a petition which was filed challenging the impugned order of the appellate commissioner confirming the original order passed by the adjudicating authority under section 129 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 for detention of the goods in question on the grounds that the e-way bill relating to the consignment in question had expired one day before, i.e. in the midnight of September 8, 2019, and that the goods was detained in the morning of September 9, 2019 on the grounds that the e-way bill has expired which is even less than one day and extension could not be made and petitioner submits that delay of few hours even less than a day of expiry of the validity of the tenure of the e-way bill was not deliberate and willful and was due to break down of the vehicle in question and there was no intention of any evasion of tax on the part of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Repealed Acts<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Whether the orders passed under a repealed Act be executed? Court discusses<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rajasekhar Mantha, J. disposed of a petition observing that the Supreme Court is the only authority to clarify\u00a0 whether the orders passed under a repealed Act can be executed or not<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Breach of Contract<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Parties to agreement of sale consciously changing their relationship cannot seek relief on the basis of previously established relationship<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Soumen Sen and\u00a0 Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal concerned with a breach of contract. The appeal arose out of a judgment in a suit for recovery of possession and injunction. Trial Court had decreed the suit on contest and dismissed the counter claim filed by the defendant.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Detention Order<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Detention order quashed due to lack of opportunity of hearing in the matter of S. 129 of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017<\/strong><\/p>\n

Md. Nizamuddin, J. disposed of a petition which was filed challenging the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue on the ground that the said impugned order was bad in law for the reasons that the petitioners being the owner of the goods in question, which had been detained without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners under the relevant provision of Section 129 of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

GST Act<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

The interest of revenue has been safeguarded; Order of detention against the State upheld in matter of GST Act<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of T. S. Sivagnanam and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ., dismissed an appeal and connected application which was filed by the State against the order of detention passed by the authority detaining two trucks containing consignment of steel and other products in WPA 17611 of 2021 dated: 07-12-2021 wherein petitioner was the wife of late Mohit Madhogoria, who was a registered dealer under the provisions of the W.B.V.A.T. Act presently under the GST Act.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Chhattisgarh High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Compassionate Appointment<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Illegitimate child\u2019s right to be considered for Compassionate appointment<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sanjay K. Agarwal, J., held that an illegitimate son would be entitled to consideration on compassionate ground and cannot be denied consideration on the ground that he is the illegitimate son of the deceased Government servant.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Rape<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

In view of changed definition of rape under S. 375 (b) of\u00a0 IPC pari materia to S. 3(b) of POCSO Act, whether sexual intercourse is necessary to attract ingredients of offence of rape or penetrative sexual assault?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Addressing a case wherein a minor girl was subjected to sexual, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J., held that,<\/p>\n

In view of the changed definition of rape under Section 375 (b) of the IPC\u00a0pari materia\u00a0<\/em>to Section 3(b) of the POCSO Act, sexual intercourse is not necessary to attract the ingredients of offence of rape or penetrative sexual assault.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Delhi High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Dishonour of Cheque<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

To prove that cheque amount was larger than debt due, can defence of Issuer be looked at stage of issuing summons?<\/strong><\/p>\n

While addressing a matter revolving around Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Subramonium Prasad, J., held that Courts should primarily proceed on the averments in the complaint, and the defence of the accused cannot be looked at the stage of issuing summons unless it can be shown on admitted documents which the Supreme Court described as \u201cunimpeachable in nature and sterling in quality\u201d to substantiate that there was no debt due and payable by the person who has issued the cheque or that the cheque amount is large than the debt due.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

If a cheque is not honoured by issuer and even after a legal notice he doesn\u2019t pay, he is bound to face criminal trial<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., dismissed a matter revolving around the dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Yes Bank Loan Fraud<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Public money under garb of Term loan siphoned off, resulting in generation of \u2018proceeds of crime\u2019 as well as its layering and ultimate projection as untainted money: Del HC while denying bail to Gautam Thapar<\/strong><\/p>\n

While addressing a matter wherein bail of Gautam Thapar accused in Yes Bank Loan Fraud case, was sought, Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., expressed that it is well settled that, economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach, given their severity and magnitude. Albeit these offences are likely to adversely impact the economic fabric of the country, bail shall not be denied to a person accused of an economic offence in a routine manner.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Jurisdiction<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can partners in dispute of an LLP or any other business entity carrying out business in different parts of country, file suit in any place where business is carried out?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Amit Bansal, J., expressed that an LLP or any other business entity can carry out business in different parts of the country, but that would not mean that a suit with regard to disputes between the partners, could be filed in any place where the business of the firm\/LLP is carried out.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Ownership of YouTube Channel<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Who \u2018owns\u2019 a YouTube channel?: Del HC passes interim directions in dispute over channel \u2018Shabad Kirtan Gurbani \u2013 Divine Amrit Bani\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

Asha Menon, J., considered a very interesting case where the dispute between the parties is regarding the ownership of a YouTube channel. The Court has found a prima facie case in favour of the plaintiff and issued certain directions.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Bail<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

On pretext of removing evil spirit from body of a woman who was bipolar in nature, a man lured woman and committed sexual intercourse, but ADJ granted bail: Will HC cancel his bail? Del HC analyses<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mukta Gupta, J., cancelled the bail of an accused who lured a female on the pretext of removing an evil spirit from her body and further committing sexual intercourse with her.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Theft<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Daughter-in-law thrown out of matrimonial home and accused of removal of letters from possession of matrimonial home: Whether Del HC will find her guilty under S. 380 IPC or not?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Chandra Dhari Singh, J., noted that instant dispute has arisen out of matrimonial discord between two people which had also, led to the filing of more than 50 criminal and civil cases between not only the husband and the wife but also their family members. It was found that for the sole purpose of harassing the other party such cases were filed by persons with no just cause or reason and substantial ground for allegations.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Right of Residence<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Right of residence under DV Act is exclusive to and isolated from any right that may arise under S. 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe existence of the strained relationship between the Petitioner and the Respondent has been well established by the fact that there are more than about 60 criminal and civil cases pending between the parties.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Desertion and Cruelty<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Wife leaves matrimonial home and never returns after several requests and legal notice under S. 9 of HMA, alleges husband of several cruelties without any evidence: Would it amount to desertion and cruelty by wife?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Noting the separation of 12 years between the husband and wife, t<\/strong>he Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., found that the wife had subjected the husband to desertion and cruelty, hence decree of divorce be granted.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Accusation of extra-marital relationship is a grave assault on character, status, reputation as well as health of spouse against whom such allegations are made: Would this come under ambit of cruelty?<\/strong><\/p>\n

While addressing a matter surrounding the issue of cruelty by wife, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, ACJ and Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J., expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201cIt has repeatedly been held that accusations of unchastity or extra marital relationship is a grave assault on character, status, reputation as well as health of the spouse against whom such allegations were made.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Del HC dismisses appeal filed by Indiabulls Housing Finance in Zee Entertainment \u2013 Sony Pictures Scheme of Arrangement<\/strong><\/p>\n

Suresh Kumar Kait, J., addressed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the interim order passed by Arbitrator was preferred.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Mere use of the word \u2018Arbitration\u2019 in the heading of an Agreement would mean existence of an arbitration agreement?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mukta Gupta, J., decided that mere use of word \u2018Arbitration\u2019 in the heading of an Agreement would not mean the existence of an arbitration agreement.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Religious Structure<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

State obligated to remove unauthorized constructions from public land, but if it is a religious structure, can State still be obligated to do so?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Expressing that, the mere fact that certain encroachments represent religious structure cannot possibly detract State from its obligation, Yashwant Varma, J., held that, State remains duty-bound to remove all unauthorized constructions which may exist on public land.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Extraordinary writ jurisdiction is to be exercised only in rare cases or certain contingencies in the interest of justice, including exceptional cases<\/strong><\/p>\n

Chandra Dhari Singh, J., expressed that it is settled law that the power to issue writ has its own well-defined limitations imposed by the High Courts, one of which was the availability of alternative efficacious remedy.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Power to Transfer Cases<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can Chairman of CAT on his own motion, without any notice, transfer any case pending before one Bench for disposal to another Bench?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of D.N. Patel, CJ and Jyoti Singh, J., held that the Chairman of Central Administrative Tribunal has been conferred the power to transfer a matter from one Bench to another, on his own motion, without any application from any party.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Right to Speedy Trial<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Incarcerated for 8 years for an offence punishable with minimum 10 years imprisonment: Violation of Right to Personal Liberty and Right to Speedy Trial<\/strong><\/p>\n

Subramonium Prasad, J., remarked that,<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026achievement of universal equality before the law requires the tenets of personal liberty to be applicable to all similarly circumstanced individuals and must not be restricted unless according to procedure established by law.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Arms License<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

If you are found in possession of live ammunition along with a valid arms licence, can an offence under S. 25 of Arms Act still be registered against you?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Deciding a matter of whether an NRI person in possession of two live ammunitions with a valid license can be registered under Section 25 of Arms Act or not, Asha Menon, J., held that, prima facie no malafide intent was found and the licence found was a valid arms licence.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Right of Putative Father<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Right of Putative Father to visit minor child upheld: Del HC<\/strong><\/p>\n

Upholding the rights of the putative father,\u00a0<\/strong>V. Kameswar Rao, J., expressed that while determining and granting such rights, more so when the child is of less than 3 years of age, surely his well-being\/welfare is of paramount importance<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Issuance of Notice<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Section 292BB of Income Tax Act deals with failure of service of notice or failure to issue notice?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Manmohan and Dinesh Kumar Sharma, JJ., addressed a matter wherein the decision of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Year 2011-12 was challenged.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

RTI Act<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Employees of a security establishment cannot be deprived of their fundamental and legal rights just because they work in an intelligence and security establishment<\/strong><\/p>\n

Expressing that, RTI Act is a tool that facilitates the employees and officers in airing their grievances systematically,\u00a0<\/strong>the Division Bench of Manmohan and Sudhir Kumar Jain, JJ., remarked that,<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026both service and RTI laws \u2018act like a safety valve in the society<\/em>\u2019.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Maternity Leave<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can maternity leave benefits extend beyond the period when contractual period of an ad hoc employee comes to an end?<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a claim of maternity benefit by a contractual employee, the Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., expressed that, The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Act is a social legislation that should be worked in a manner that progresses not only the best interest of the women-employee but also of the child, both at the pre-natal and post-natal stage.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Unmarried Daughters<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can unmarried daughters claim expenses of marriage from their parents under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956?<\/strong><\/p>\n

While stating that, in Indian society, normally expenses are required to be incurred for pre-marriage and also at the time of marriage,\u00a0<\/strong>the Division Bench of Goutam Bhaduri and Sanjay S. Agrawal, JJ., held that unmarried daughters have a right to claim expenses of marriage from their parents under the Hindu Adoptions & Maintenance Act, 1956.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

SC Collegium December Meeting<\/span><\/p>\n
\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/del><\/h4>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Newspaper reports are of no evidentiary value and Courts would be transgressing their well settled limitation if cognizance were to be taken of such unsubstantiated and unverified reports<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a matter wherein, details were sought with regard to Supreme Court Collegium meeting held on 12-12-2018, Yashwant Varma, J., expressed that, newspaper reports are of no evidentiary value and Courts would be clearly transgressing their well-settled limitation if cognizance were to be taken of such unsubstantiated and unverified reports.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Gujarat High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Reasoning in Judgment<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Providing reasoning is to give it a value of precedent which can help in reduction of frivolous litigation; Court emphasises on recording reasons in judgments<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cIt is trite that in a delay application, sufficient cause is the paramount consideration and if sufficient cause is shown, the Court should generally condone the delay. However, if the sufficient cause is imbibed with the laxity on the part of the delayer despite due knowledge, then Court should restrain itself from encouraging such practice and condone the delay.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

GSTR-6 Return<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Court allows writ furnishing the GSTR \u2013 6 return for recording and distributing the ISD credit<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cCredit was a tax paid by the registered person on input transactions and such tax already paid to the credit of the Central Government was a vested right of the person. Such vested right cannot be defeated on account of any irregularity in the system evolved by the Government.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

NDPS<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

No Conscious possession; Court upholds acquittal under NDPS Act<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of S.H. Vora and Sandeep N. Bhatt, JJ., dismissed an application for special leave to appeal which was filed feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order in NDPS Case whereby the trial Court acquitted the respondent 2 herein-original accused 2 of the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (\u201cNDPS Act\u201d).<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Detention Order<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Simplicitor registration of FIR\/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order; Detention order quashed<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rajendra M. Sareen, J. allowed a petition which was directed against the detention order passed by respondent\u2013detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (\u201cthe Act\u201d) by detaining the petitioner-detenue as defined under section 2(b) of the Act.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Gauhati High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Sexual offences against minor cannot be compromised by parents; HC rejects application to enforce compromise<\/strong><\/p>\n

Arun Dev Choudhury, J., held that sexual offences against minor cannot be compromised by parents.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Himachal Pradesh High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Rape<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Minor girl students raped and subjected to penetrative sexual assault by their teacher: Sanctity of Teacher-Student relationship polluted<\/strong><\/p>\n

Polluting the sanctity of the relationship of the teacher and students, a teacher committed rape and penetrative sexual assault with minor students, the Division Bench of Sabina and Satyen Vaidya, JJ., noting the harrowing incidents expressed that the said is a sad reflection of the present-day society where a most platonic relationship was exploited.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Jharkhand High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Execution of a Will<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Testamentary disposition of property is deviation from natural line of inheritance in lesser or greater degree: Can it result in complete disposition in favour of one heir or exclusion of any other heir?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Expressing that the due execution of a Will is to be proved as per the provisions of law as laid down in Evidence Act as well as that if Indian Succession Act,\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J., remarked that, a probate court being a Court of conscience, the intention of the testator is paramount and it is the bounden duty of the Court to ascertain the real WILL of the testator if any.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Karnataka High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Domestic Violence Act<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Whether the maintenance awarded under the Domestic Violence Act can be sought to be enhanced under the CrPC?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe language employed in Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. is unequivocal as on a proof of change in the circumstances of any person receiving allowance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. can maintain a petition under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Criminal Proceedings<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

SC-ST Act is prospective or retrospective? Kar HC quashes criminal proceedings for offences committed in the year 1975<\/strong><\/p>\n

Krishna S Dixit J. quashes the criminal proceedings as the SC-ST act is not retrospective in nature.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Hijab Ban<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

16 pointer report on why wearing of Hijab is not a part of essential religious practice in Islam<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cDismayed as to how all of a sudden that too in the middle of an academic term the issue of\u00a0hijab\u00a0<\/em>is generated and blown out of proportion, Court remarked that some\u00a0\u2018unseen hands\u2019\u00a0<\/em>are at work to engineer social unrest and disharmony in the way\u00a0\u2018hijab imbroglio\u2019\u00a0<\/em>unfolded.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

The uniform can exclude any other apparel like bhagwa or blue shawl that may have the visible religious overtones<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Holy Quran does not mandate wearing of\u00a0hijab\u00a0<\/em>or headgear for Muslim women rather it was traditionally worn as a measure of social security\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

POCSO<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Whether victim under POCSO Act can be permitted to be cross-examined once she turns hostile?<\/strong><\/p>\n

M Nagaprasanna J. allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order and remitted the matter back to Sessions Judge for cross-examination<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Marital Rape<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u201cWanton lust, vicious appetite, depravity of senses, loathsome beast of passion, unbridled unleashing of carnal desire of demonish perversion\u201d Kar HC discusses protection provided to husband by the institution of marriage<\/strong><\/p>\n

A man is a man; an act is an act; rape is a rape, be it performed by a man the \u201chusband\u201d on the woman \u201cwife\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Kerala High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Cruelty<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

At odd hours, if wife continues making discreet phone calls with another man even after a warning by husband, would it constitute matrimonial cruelty?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Dr Justice Kauser Edappagath, JJ., held that, despite a warning by the husband, if the wife continues to make discreet calls with another man that too at odd hours, it would amount to matrimonial cruelty.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Medical Negligence<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Do District and State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions do not have jurisdiction to take cognizance of medical negligence complaints?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nagaresh, J., decided whether medical service would fall within the ambit of Section 2(42) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 unless of course the service is free of charge or is under a contract of personal service.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Breach<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Compensation payable under Ss. 73, 74 and 75 are only for loss or damage caused by breach or inclusive of mere act of breach as well?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha, JJ., expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026compensation payable under Sections 73, 74 as also under Section 75 is only for loss or damage caused by the breach and not account of the mere act of breach. If in any case the breach has not resulted in or caused any loss or damage to a party, person concerned cannot claim compensation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The words \u2018loss or damage\u2019 in the Sections 73 and 74 would necessarily indicate that the party who complains of breach must have really suffered some loss or damage apart from being faced with the mere act of breach of contract. That is because every breach of every contract need not necessarily result in actual loss or damage.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Internal Complaints Committee<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

In the film industry, would production units have to constitute Internal Complaints Committee to deal with harassment against women?<\/span><\/h4>\n

While expressing that, any organisations, establishments, private institutions are employing workers whether for wages or not in contemplation of the provisions of the Act, 2013 coming under the definition of employer, employee and workplace, they are duty bound to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee, \u00a0the Division Bench of S. Manikumar, CJ and Shaji P. Chaly, J., held that, a\u00a0production unit of each film industry is an establishment employing Actor Artists and other workers and therefore, such production units have to maintain an Internal Complaints Committee if they are engaging more than 10 workers<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Moral Policing<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Man taking a lady from another community in his car, attacked by violent mob: Act of mob moral policing?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Calling it to be \u2018moral policing\u2019 K. Haripal, J., addressed a matter wherein a man had taken a lady from another community in his car due to which a mob attacked him with deadly weapons.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Pre-arrest Bail<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Trespassed in house, committed rape, misappropriated money, threatened: Kerala HC denied pre-arrest bail in view of such allegations<\/strong><\/p>\n

Shircy V. J., dismissed a bail application wherein a man committed rape with a woman and misappropriated her money after putting her under threat.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Strikes<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bar on Government servants to engage in strikes?<\/strong><\/p>\n

While expressing that, it is the duty of the welfare Government to protect not only the citizens, but to continue with, all the Government work as expected, the Division Bench of S. Manikumar, CJ and Shaji P. Chaly, J., directed that Government servants should be prevented from engaging in a strike.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Madras High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Central Information Commission<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

High Court cannot act as a post office to collect and exchange information<\/strong><\/p>\n

While stating that Central Information Commission has only made recommendations, which cannot by any stretch of imagination be taken as a statute so as to give effect, the Division Bench of Munishwar Nath Bhandari, CJ and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J., dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Promotion<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Can an employee claim promotion as a matter of right?<\/strong><\/p>\n

S.M. Subramaniam, J., expressed that employees cannot seek any direction to fill up the post or claim a promotional post.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Bribe<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Every Advocate is a Court officer and part & parcel of justice delivery system: Madras HC found a Govt. Advocate demanding bribes at the cost of justice<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of K. Kalyanasundaram and R. Hemalatha, JJ., expressed that, the Government advocate being the representative of the Government has to act in an honest manner. If he\/she goes around with the intention to make money at the cost of justice, only chaos will prevail.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Manipur High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Appointment\/Promotion of High School Teachers<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

All resolutions passed at the emergency meeting will be subject to confirmation or revision at the next ordinary meeting; Court allows petition<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cRule 14 (b) of the Rules of 1975 provides that all resolutions passed at the emergency meeting will be subject to confirmation or revision at the next ordinary meeting, none of the respondents, either the State or the respondent 3 to 10 has brought on record that the resolution passed in the emergency meeting held on 21-02-2015 was confirmed or revised in the next ordinary meeting.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Writ of Mandamus<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

A writ for mandamus cannot lie to direct the State to enact a law; Petition dismissed<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J.dismissed a petition which was filed in public interest praying for a writ of mandamus to incorporate certain provisions in the law, namely, Section 14-A of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 and Section 32-A of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Election Dispute<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Registrar exercising power of the election tribunal cannot pass interim directions of any nature; Court allows appeal<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026Registrar who was trying the election dispute was exercising the power of the election tribunal. Therefore, he could not have passed orders even though it was in the interest of society.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Custody<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Subodh Abhyankar and Satyendra Kumar Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal which was filed being aggrieved of the order passed by Single Judge wherein he quashed the earlier impugned order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate whereby custody of the children of the appellant was given to her husband (respondent 4). The Single Judge had only partly granted relief by not giving any express direction restoring the custody of the children in favour of the appellant.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Appointment Order<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Cancellation of candidature on the ground of typographical error arbitrary and grossly disproportionate; Court allows petition<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pranay Verma, J., allowed a petition which was filed praying for a direction to consider petitioner\u2019s candidature for the post of Office Assistant (Multi purpose) and to issue appointment order in her favour in light of offer letter.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Meghalaya High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Family Pension<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Court decides on eligibility of family pension under Rule 48 of Meghalaya Civil Services Pension Rules of 1983<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cRule 48, provides that an unmarried\/widowed\/divorced daughter, would be entitled to family pension and that a person would be entitled for family pension, only after other eligible family members in the first category have ceased to be eligible to receive it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Companies Act<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

If an advertisement for petition filed under S. 433 of Companies Act, 1956 is not published, will entire matter be transferred to NCLT?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sanjib Banerjee, CJ, addressed a petition wherein a creditor\u2019s winding-up petition was instituted under Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the same was not yet advertised.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Testimony<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Court affirms trial court\u2019s conviction on the basis of victim\u2019s testimony in POCSO matter<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of\u00a0 Sanjib Banerjee and W. Diengdoh, JJ., while hearing an appeal which challenged the judgment of conviction of December 21, 2018, which convicted the appellant under Section 3(a) R\/W Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, upheld the same and stated that there was no good reason to interfere with the judgement of the trial court.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Compromise Deed<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Lower Courts to deal with entire process expeditiously after receipt of the application under S. 151 read with Or. 20 R. 6-A CPC<\/strong><\/p>\n

H.S. Thangkhiew, J. while hearing a revision application allowed the same and directed the lower court to deal with the entire process expeditiously immediately on receipt of the application under Section 151 read with Order 20 Rule 6-A CPC.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Inherent Power<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant; Ori HC analyses how does prohibition under S. 362 CrPC operate viz-a- viz the inherent power of the High Court<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is the oft-repeated and a salutary principle of law that fraud and justice never dwell together (fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant)<\/em><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Rape<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

If a man rubs his organ on vagina over victim\u2019s underpants, would that amount to rape?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee, CJ and W. Diengdoh, J., addressed that, if the victim\u2019s underwear was not taken down and the man merely rubbed himself on the victim\u2019s crotch while she still wore her underpants, would that amount to commission of rape.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

POCSO<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

FIR and proceedings in Special POCSO Case quashed; Minor \u2018victim\u2019 gave birth to child while living with accused as his wife<\/strong><\/p>\n

Diengdoh, J. allowed a petition which was filed praying to quash the criminal proceedings pending in the Court of the Special Judge (POCSO) under Section 5(j)(ii)\/6 POCSO Act, 2012.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Live-in Relationship<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

In ever-evolving society, evolving law with it, time to shift perspective from didactics of orthodox society, shackled with strong strings of morality to one that values an individual\u2019s life<\/strong><\/p>\n

While dealing with a matter regarding protection to live-in relationship, Anoop Chitkara, J., held that,\u00a0every person in the territory of India has an inherent and indefeasible fundamental right to life flowing from Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the State is duty-bound to protect life.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Laws governing \u2018Live-in-relationships\u2019 is need of the hour; Court directs State to file response on the social predicament<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2018Live-in-relationships\u2019 has always been a debatable issue because of the absence of any law on the said practice. The Legislation has not yet consolidated any Act in this regard; on the other hand the Judiciary, through several decisions has made a clear stand to protect the various rights of such couples. Supreme Court in\u00a0Lata Singh v. State of U.P<\/em>.,\u00a0(2006) 5 SCC 475<\/a>,\u00a0S. Khushbhoo v. Kanniammal<\/em>,\u00a0(2010) 5 SCC 600<\/a>, and\u00a0Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma<\/em>,\u00a0(2013) 15 SCC 755<\/a>, has upheld the status of live-in-relationships and issued certain direction to protect life and liberty of the individuals.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

MBBS Course<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Whether Court can issue directions for filling up the vacant seat for the MBBS Course?<\/strong><\/p>\n

S. Thangkhiew, J. allowed a petition in which he had to consider whether this Court can direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for filling up the vacant seat for the MBBS Course.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Recission of Contract<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Application for rescission of contract \u2018mandatory\u2019 to avail the relief, as S. 28, Specific Relief Act, 1963 doesn\u2019t confer indefeasible right<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sudhir Mittal, J. dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioners (in this case the judgment-debtors) against the action of the Executing Court for refusing to recall the impugned order. According to the petitioners, the execution order was passed, ex parte hence, the fundamental principle of natural justice was violated.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Carnal Intercourse<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Use of phrase \u201ccarnal intercourse\u201d considered as a conscious act of the legislature reflecting the clear intent to engraft an offence under S. 377 IPC, conviction upheld<\/strong><\/p>\n

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. contemplated the revision petition filed by the accused\/ children in conflict with the law, challenging the dismissal of appeal by Additional District and Sessions Judge along with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, for the commission of offence punishable under Section 377 of Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Cooling Off Period<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Cooling off period under S. 13-B (2) HMA directory and not mandatory, court must waive off statutory period where marriage is irreconcilable<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rajbir Sehrawat, J., allowed the instant revision petition, filed against the order of Family Court, where the joint application for waving off the statutory period of 6 months for cooling off, had been dismissed.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

CBSE<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Schools succeeded in hoodwinking CBSE, however, no fault can be attributed to the students; direction for issuance of class 12th result<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sudhir Mittal, J. allowed the writ petitions filed against the action of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) declaring petitioners ineligible for evaluation of class 12th<\/sup>\u00a0and to issue the final result.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Fundamental Rights vis a vis Judicial Review<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Answer to the question on \u2018fundamental rights vis-a-vis judicial review\u2019 considered as \u2018National Confusion\u2019 as different interpretation possible<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rajbir Sehrawat. J., contemplated and answered the interesting question asked in the recruitment test on which the dispute of the petitioner revolves around. Thorough interpretation of judgments starting from\u00a0Sankari Prasad to I.R. Coelho\u00a0<\/em>was analysed by the Court to formulate the correct answer asked in the recruitment test.<\/p>\n

\u201c73.\u00a0<\/strong>Which of the following schedule of the Constitution is immune from judicial review on the grounds of violation of fundamental rights?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. A) Seventh Schedule B) Ninth Schedule C) Tenth Schedule D) None of the above\u201d<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Material Fact<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Suppression of a \u2018material fact\u2019 of non-disclosure of pendency of bail application considered, subservient to the right of liberty granted to the petitioners; Guidelines issued<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Three petitions are clubbed together where the petitioners intended to withdraw their bail applications as bail was already granted by the different trial courts. The main issue before Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J.\u00a0was effect of filing bail applications and passing of bail orders by the trial courts during the pendency of bail application before High Court by the same accused without disclosing such pendency and what safeguards should be adopted by the trial courts in this regard<\/u>.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Compensation<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Entitlement to compensation on general principles for inordinate delay in receiving monies due; Interest on refund of excise duty granted<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Division Bench of Ajay Tewari and Pankaj Jain, JJ., contemplated the appeal where the interest on refund of excise duty was rejected by the authorities. The main question before the Court was whether the assessee was entitled to interest.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Departmental Punishment<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Departmental punishment of government servant is not a necessary and automatic consequence of conviction on a criminal charge<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Jaishree Thakur, J. set aside and quashed the dismissal of the petitioner and remanded back the matter to the punishing authority for reconsideration. The Court directed that punishing authority to apply its mind and to form an opinion as to whether the conviction of the petitioner deserves the penalty of dismissal, removal or reduction in rank or any other lesser penalty.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n
    \n

    Patna High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n

    Economic Offence<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Entire community is aggrieved if economic offenders, who ruin economy of the State are not brought to book<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Expressing that the\u00a0entire community is aggrieved if the economic offenders, who ruin the economy of the State are not brought to book,\u00a0<\/strong>Anjani Kumar Sharan, J., held that\u00a0economic offence is committed with cool calculation and deliberate design with an eye on personal profit regardless of the consequence to the community.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n
    \n

    Rajasthan High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Whenever there is a conflict between substantial justice and hyper-technicality then substantial justice should be preferred to avoid defeat for the ends of justice: Raj HC observes in a case where candidature was rejected on a hyper-technical approach<\/strong><\/p>\n

    A Division Bench of Anoop Kumar Dhand and Pankaj Bharadwaj, JJ., disposed of the petition and directed the Department to appoint the respondent.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Cause Title<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    \u201c..use of salutation and titles is prohibited in terms of Arts. 14 18 and 363A of the Constitution of India in public documents and public offices\u201d; Raj HC observes in a case where hereditary title was mentioned in a cause title<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u201c\u2026any title awarded to the citizen of India by a Foreign State cannot be accepted nor used and no such title, other than the military or academic distinctions, can be conferred other than by the State. In terms of Article 363A of the Constitution of India, the heredity titles of nobility being in conflict with the principles of equality and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India cannot be used as prefixes or suffixes.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Provisional Attachment<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Order of provisional attachment cannot survive beyond a period of one year in terms of S. 83 (2) CGST Act; Provisional attachment order stayed<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u201cSection 83 of the CGST Act pertains to provisional attachment to protect the revenue in certain cases. In sub-section (1) of Section 83 the commissioner is empowered to order provisional attachment of the property of the assessee including bank account where proceedings under Chapters XII, XIV and XV are pending and the commissioner is of the opinion that for the purpose of protecting the interest of government revenue it is necessary so to do.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Public Interest Litigation<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    \u201cCitizen approaching Court in a public interest jurisdiction holds greater duty to make full research\u201d PIL dismissed due to lack of necessary evidence presented<\/strong><\/p>\n

    A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and Rekha Borana, J. dismissed the petition and kept it open for the petitioners to file a fresh public interest petition.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Private Entity<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    In absence of any factual foundation to show whether a particular entity is State or not, writ jurisdiction not maintainable<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal J. dismissed the petition being not maintainable against a private entity.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Interim Maintenance<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Raj HC dealt with whether husband can be absolved from his duty to pay interim maintenance if there is delay of 30+ years in filing application<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u201c\u2026an order under Section 125 of CrPC is in the nature of interim maintenance and husband, who admittedly earns Rs 40, 000\/- per month cannot be absolved of his obligation to pay interim maintenance, merely because the respondent \u2013 wife has chosen to file the application after 36 years of marriage.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Transfer Petition<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Transfer petition for trial of Salman Khan\u2019s deer hunting case allowed; High Court to take charge<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., allowed a transfer petition in the infamous deer hunting case of actor Salman Khan.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Bail<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Narendra Singh Dhaddha rejected bail and dismissed the petition being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Sikkim High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n

    Compromise<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Handing out punishment is not the sole form of delivering justice; Court allows compromise<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. allowed the compromise to bury the difference between parties and gives them their lives as good citizens.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Tripura High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n

    Disposal of Garbage<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Court directs AMC to set up proper slaughterhouses and ensure garbage disposal in scientific manner<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Court issued directions to the Corporation to prepare a long-term plan for not only setting up the abattoir\/slaughter house but also for ensuring disposal of garbage in an appropriate scientific manner, rendering all authorities including the local police authorities for enforcing\/assisting in carrying out its duties, considering application for licenses and disposing of at an early date so that people are not deprived of essential needs, maintaining hygienic conditions and carrying out inspection of all the license premises.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Divorce<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Unable to approve this kind of matrimonial conduct or filing a suit for divorce on such coloured narrative; Court dismisses appeal in matter of divorce<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Division Bench of S. Talapatra and S.G. Chattopadhyay, JJ. dismissed an appeal which was filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 from the judgment by the Additional District Judge declining to grant the divorce and consequently dismissing the suit. It was observed that case did not reflect any such situation which can demand the dissolution of marriage between the petitioner [the appellant and the respondent].<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Uttaranchal High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    \n
    \n

    Personal Rights<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Irrespective of the personal rights of a person or a community, it can under no set of circumstances, override the rights or need of the defence of the country; Petition dismissed<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. dismissed a writ petition which involved the issue pertaining to regulating the frontier borders of the country, adjoining to the \u2018Line of Actual Control\u2019, which adjoins and shares the boundary lines of our neighbouring country, China, which is approximately about 20 to 25 Kms. only away from the land, in dispute, which is proposed to be acquired for the purposes of meeting out the defence need of the ITBPF, i.e. ITBP.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Judgment of Acquittal<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    There have to be very substantial and compelling reasons for setting aside a judgment of acquittal; petition dismissed<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and A.K. Verma, JJ., dismissed the appeal for acquittal considering it to be devoid of substantial and compelling reasons.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Hate Speech<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Right to freedom, as granted under the Constitution is not an absolute right; Court rejects bail in Hate Speech matter<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Ravindra Maithani, J., rejected a bail application which was filed by the applicant who was in judicial custody under Sections 153A, 298 Penal code, 1860.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Public Service Commission<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Public Service Commission directed to declare result of candidate who submitted late fees<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Division Bench of Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, CJ. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. allowed a petition which was filed by an aspirant seeking a direction to respondents to allow the petitioner to appear for the mains examination of the Assistant Conservator of Forest.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Registration of Sikh Marriages<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    State directed to take steps to frame and notify Rules for Registration of Sikh Marriages<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Division Bench of Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, ACJ. and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. took up a PIL filed by the petitioner commanding the respondent State to notify the Rules under Anand Marriage Act, 1909 and also to issue guidelines to register the marriage of people of Sikh Community under the Anand Marriage Act, 1909.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n

    Bail<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n<\/blockquote>\n

    Society has a vital interest in grant or refusal of bail because criminal offence is the offence against the society; Bail applications rejected in fraud case under Epidemic Diseases Act<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Alok Kumar Verma, J. rejected three bail applications of the applicants who were in custody for the offence under Sections 188, 269, 270, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC, Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Section 53 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.<\/p>\n

    Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

    \n
    \n

    Weekly Roundups from March<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n

    Stories of sexual assault of a minor, woman travelling in public transport experiencing inappropriate touch and how children below 12 years of age are ‘asexual’ | Read 7 Legal Stories of the week<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n