{"id":264773,"date":"2022-03-31T14:00:16","date_gmt":"2022-03-31T08:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=264773"},"modified":"2022-03-31T10:39:20","modified_gmt":"2022-03-31T05:09:20","slug":"economic-offender","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Narendra Singh Dhaddha rejected bail and dismissed the petition being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code i.e. Cr.P.C. relating to offence punishable under Sections 132 (1)(A), (F),(H),(I),(L) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 i.e. CGST Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in initial complaint, allegation was against the Vinaykant Ameta not against the petitioner and the respondent\u2019s department does not have adequate data for evasion of tax of Rs.869 Crores. It was further submitted that the case against the petitioner is on surmises and conjectures and that the maximum punishment in this case is 5 years and case against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. It was further submitted that offence against the petitioner is compoundable and the provision of Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. is not applicable in this case and Department had not taken leave from concerned Court for further investigation. Hence, the petitioner be enlarged on bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for respondent submitted that the petitioner and Vinay Kant Ameta were working as Director in M\/s Miraj Products Private Limited and is responsible for the tax evasion. It was further submitted that as per Investigation, total tax evasion of Rs.869 Crores wherein M\/s Miraj Products Private Limited had created the fake firm for tax evasion. It was also brought forth that the Supreme Court granted the bail of Vinay Kant Ameta on depositing of Rs.200 crores and if the petitioner is ready to deposit evasion of tax with penalty then he has no objection in granting the bail. However it was submitted that department had summoned the various persons of the M\/s Miraj Products Private Limited Group for investigation but they had not turned up for investigation till today. So, on account of gravity of offence, bail be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the petitioner and Vinaykant Ameta were Director in M\/s Miraj Products Private Limited. As per the prosecution story, they had evaded tax of Rs. 869 Crores. GST department had seized one truck which was being unloaded at their premises. The Supreme Court in various pronouncement held that the economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy and they are serious threat to the national economy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court thus held <em>\u201cin the facts and circumstances of the present case and also looking to the seriousness of the offence(s) alleged against the petitioner without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I do not consider it a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.\u201d<\/em>[Sohan Singh Rao v. Union of India, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2555\/2022, decided on 24-03-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appearance:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Petitioner(s): Mr. V. R. Bajwa, Senior Adv. With Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. &amp; Mr. Snehdeep Khyaliya, Adv.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondent(s): Mr. Kinshuk Jain for DGGI<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: Narendra Singh Dhaddha rejected bail and dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The present bail application has been <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,29698,34012,32228,3764,49012,49013,6241,49014],"class_list":["post-264773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-cgst","tag-company","tag-director","tag-economic_offences","tag-general-offence","tag-goods-and-service-tax","tag-gst","tag-tax-central-goods-and-service-tax"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-31T08:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-31T08:30:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected | SCC Times","description":"Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected","og_description":"Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-31T08:30:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/","name":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-03-31T08:30:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/economic-offender\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Economic offender should not be dealt as general offender because economic offenders run parallel economy; bail rejected"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":356806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/17\/pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":264773,"position":0},"title":"Pending investigation against co-accused cannot be sole ground to deny bail to accused under Section 132 CGST Act: Punjab &amp; Haryana HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The involvement of criminal justice system in cases pertaining to CGST Act begins at the stage of arrest and ends when bail is secured. Allowing such tendencies to go unchecked will raise serious doubts about efficacy of investigation, which naturally weakens the faith of the public in justice dispensation mechanism.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Pending investigation no ground to deny bail","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Pending-investigation-no-ground-to-deny-bail.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/19\/raj-hc-refers-issue-of-conversion-of-arrest-warrants-into-bailable-warrants-to-larger-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":264773,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court: Can arrest warrants be converted into bailable warrants in economic\/heinous offences? Larger Bench to decide","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJudicial decorum and legal propriety mandates that where a Single Bench or Division Bench does not agree with the decision of the Bench of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the matter should be referred to a Larger Bench.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conversion of arrest warrants in bailable warrant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Conversion-of-arrest-warrants-in-bailable-warrant.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/14\/del-hc-ss-69-and-132-of-cgst-act-valid-power-to-arrest-and-prosecute-ancillary-to-power-to-levy-and-collect-gst-read-hcs-detailed-analysis\/","url_meta":{"origin":264773,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;Ss. 69 and 132 of CGST Act prima facie valid; Power to arrest and prosecute is prima facie ancillary to power to levy and collect GST&#8221;: Read HC&#8217;s detailed analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Manmohan and Sanjeev Narula, JJ., upheld the validity of Sections 132 and 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and refused any interim relief to the petitioner. Petitioners submitted that Sections 69 and 132 of the Central Goods and Services\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":346101,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/19\/calcutta-high-court-grants-bail-gst-itc-arrest-without-adjudication-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":264773,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court grants bail in \u20b937.29 cr GST ITC fraud case involving arrest without adjudication","author":"Arunima","date":"April 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Memo of Arrest Served on the petitioner records that the arrest is based on the alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to \u20b937.29 crores purportedly based on invoices raised without actual supply of goods","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218037,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/13\/utt-hc-precondition-of-appeal-under-cgst-act-must-be-payment-of-the-demanded-tax-and-10-of-the-disputed-amount\/","url_meta":{"origin":264773,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Precondition of appeal under CGST Act must be payment of the demanded tax and 10% of the disputed amount","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a special appeal filed against the order of Single Judge in a writ petition where the petition was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. Factual matrix of the case was that the appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":142731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/15\/impact-implications-of-gst-on-legal-practitioners-clarification-sought-from-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":264773,"position":5},"title":"Impact &#038; implications of GST on Legal Practitioners: Clarification sought from Government","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Taking note of the fact that the legal practitioners are under a genuine doubt whether they require to get themselves registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (CGST Act), the Delhi Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (DGST Act) and the Integrated Goods and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=264773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=264773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=264773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=264773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}