{"id":264509,"date":"2022-03-26T17:00:23","date_gmt":"2022-03-26T11:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=264509"},"modified":"2022-03-26T16:25:29","modified_gmt":"2022-03-26T10:55:29","slug":"private-copying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/","title":{"rendered":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>European Court of Justice, Second Chamber: <\/strong>The Bench of A. Arabadjiev, President of the First Chamber, acting as President of the Second Chamber, I. Ziemele (Rapporteur), T. von Danwitz, P.G. Xuereb and A. Kumin, Judges, held that, <em>Right holders must receive fair compensation, which, however, need not necessarily be imposed on cloud providers.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Present proceedings were in between Austro-Mechana, copyright collecting society, and Strato AG, a provider of cloud storage services, concerning the remuneration for copyright payable by Strato in respect of the provision of that service.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Background<\/span><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Austro-Mechana applied to the Handelsgericht Wien (Commercial Court, Vienna, Austria) for an order to allow it to invoice for, and take payment of remuneration in respect of, \u2018storage media of any kind\u2019, on the ground that Strato provides its business and private customers with a service known as \u2018HiDrive\u2019, by which it makes cloud computing storage space available to them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Strato contested the application on the ground that no remuneration was due in respect of cloud computing services. That company stated that it had already paid the required copyright fee in Germany, the Member State in which its servers are hosted. Further, it added that the users in Austria had also already paid a levy for the making of a private copies (the private copying levy) on the terminal equipment necessary to upload content to the cloud.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Commercial Court, Vienna dismissed the Auto-Mechana\u2019a application, holding that Strato does not make storage media available to its customers, but provides them with an online storage service.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The above-said decision was appealed to Higher Regional Court, Vienna Austria, wherein the Court referred to the following questions:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(1) Is the expression \u201con any medium\u201d in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive [2001\/29] to be interpreted as meaning that it also includes servers owned by third parties which make available to natural persons (customers) for private use (and for ends that are neither directly nor indirectly commercial) storage space on those servers which those customers use for reproduction by storage (\u201ccloud computing\u201d)?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(2) If so: is the provision cited in Question 1 to be interpreted as meaning that it is applicable to national legislation under which the author is entitled to equitable remuneration (remuneration for the exploitation of the right of reproduction on storage media), in the case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2013 where a work (which has been broadcast, made available to the public or recorded on a storage medium produced for commercial purposes) is by its nature likely to be reproduced for personal or private use by being stored \u201con a storage medium of any kind which is suitable for such reproduction and, in the course of a commercial activity, is placed on the market in national territory\u201d,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8212; and where the storage method used in that context is that described in Question 1?\u2019<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench in the present matter expressed that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">\u201c\u2026upload of a work from a user\u2019s connected terminal to a cloud storage space made available to that user in the context of a cloud computing service involves making a reproduction of that work, since that service consists of, inter alia, storing a copy of that work in the cloud. Moreover, other reproductions of that work may also be made, in particular where the user accesses the cloud by means of a connected terminal in order to download onto that terminal a work that was previously uploaded to the cloud.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Observation of the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Directive 2001\/29 provides that the private copying exception applies to reproductions on any medium. \u00a0The Court rules on the applicability of that exception to copies of works in the cloud.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As regards the concept of \u2018reproduction\u2019, the Court stated that the saving of a copy of a work in storage space in the cloud constitutes a reproduction of that work. The upload of a work to the cloud consists in storing a copy of it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With regard to the words \u2018any medium\u2019, the Court observed that these refer to all of the media on which a protected work may be reproduced, including the servers used in cloud computing. In that regard, the fact that the server belongs to a third party is not decisive. Accordingly, the private copying exception may apply to reproductions made by a natural person with the aid of a device belonging to a third party. In addition, one of the objectives of Directive 2001\/29 is to prevent copyright protection in the European Union from becoming outdated or obsolete as a result of technological developments. That objective would be undermined if the exceptions and limitations to copyright protection were interpreted in such a way as to exclude digital media and cloud computing services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><em>Subjection of providers of cloud storage services to the payment of fair compensation<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Member States which implement the private copying exception are required to provide for a system of fair compensation intended to compensate right holders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding the person liable to pay the fair compensation, it is in principle for the person carrying out the private copying, namely the user of cloud computing storage services, to finance that compensation.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Member States may introduce a private copying levy chargeable to the producer or importer of the servers by means of which the cloud computing services are offered to natural persons. That levy will be passed on economically to the purchaser of such servers and will ultimately be borne by the private user who uses that equipment or to whom a reproduction service is provided. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">When setting the private copying levy, Member States may take account of the fact that certain devices and media may be used for private copying in connection with cloud computing. However, they must ensure that the levy thus paid, in so far as it affects several devices and media in the single process of private copying, does not exceed the possible harm to the right holders.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lastly, the Court held that Directive 2001\/229 does not preclude national legislation that does not make the providers of cloud storage services subject to the payment of fair compensation. [Austro-Mechana v. Strato AG, C-433\/20, decided on 24-3-2022]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>European Court of Justice, Second Chamber: The Bench of A. Arabadjiev, President of the First Chamber, acting as President of the Second <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":71611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[48976,48975,28864,29785,42834,42768,48977,48978],"class_list":["post-264509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-cloud-computing-services","tag-coud-storage","tag-ecj","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-updates","tag-private-copying","tag-storage-media"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-26T11:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/\",\"name\":\"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-26T11:30:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":886},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains | SCC Times","description":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains","og_description":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-26T11:30:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/","name":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","datePublished":"2022-03-26T11:30:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","width":1330,"height":886},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/private-copying\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Does \u2018Private Copying\u2019 exception under Copyright Directive applies to storage in the cloud of a copy of a protected work for private purposes? ECJ explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":318589,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/insert-fingerprints-id-card-obligation-compatible-fasle-id-privacy-ecj-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":264509,"position":0},"title":"Obligation to insert fingerprints into the storage medium of ID cards is compatible with objectives of combatting the production of false ID cards: ECJ","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The ECJ stated that obligation to insert fingerprints into the storage medium of identity cards constitutes a limitation of the fundamental right to privacy and protection of personal data, which are guaranteed by the ECHR.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ECJ fingerprints for ID cards false id cards","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/ECJ-fingerprints-for-ID-cards-false-id-cards.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/ECJ-fingerprints-for-ID-cards-false-id-cards.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/ECJ-fingerprints-for-ID-cards-false-id-cards.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/ECJ-fingerprints-for-ID-cards-false-id-cards.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":71601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/20\/public-wifi-providers-not-liable-for-copyright-infringements-by-users\/","url_meta":{"origin":264509,"position":1},"title":"ECJ holds that public WiFi providers not liable for copyright infringements by users","author":"Saba","date":"September 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported in The Wall Street Journal,\u00a0\u00a0the European Court of Justice has held that the owners of shops or businesses providing WiFi connection cannot be held liable if one of their customers uses the connection to offer content which is copyrighted, for download. The Court however, observed that the owners\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Business News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Business News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/business_news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":192324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/23\/ecj-pregnant-breastfeeding-workers-can-dismissed-grounds-collective-redundancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":264509,"position":2},"title":"ECJ: Pregnant and breastfeeding workers can be dismissed on grounds of collective redundancy","author":"Saba","date":"February 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Justice: While dealing with the issue regarding the interpretation of Article 10(1) and (2) of Council Directive 92\/85\/EEC of 19 October 1992 (also known as Pregnant Workers Directive, 1992) on the measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/25\/youtube-copyright-battle\/","url_meta":{"origin":264509,"position":3},"title":"YouTube and other online platforms aren\u2019t liable for copyright infringing uploads made \u2018autonomously\u2019 by users; ECJ favours YouTube in a major Copyright battle","author":"Editor","date":"June 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Justice (ECJ): In a landmark Copyright case, the Grand Chamber composed of K. Lenaerts, President, R. Silva de Lapuerta, Vice-President, J.\u2011C. Bonichot, M. Vilaras, E. Regan and M. Ile\u0161i\u010d (Rapporteur), Presidents of Chambers, E. Juh\u00e1sz, M. Safjan, D. \u0160v\u00e1by,S. Rodin, F. Biltgen, K. J\u00fcrim\u00e4e and C. Lycourgos,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/ECJ.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207081,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/taste-of-food-not-objectively-classifiable-as-work-and-therefore-not-copyrightable-echr\/","url_meta":{"origin":264509,"position":4},"title":"\u201cTaste\u201d of food not objectively classifiable as \u201cwork\u201d and therefore not copyrightable: ECHR","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"European Court of Human Rights (The Grand Chamber): The Bench comprising of K. Lenaerts (President), R. Silva de Lapuerta (Vice President), J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, M. Vilaras (Rapporteur), E. Regan, T. Von Danwitz and C. Toader (Presidents of Chamber), A. Rosas, E. Juhasz, M. Ilesic, M. Safjan, C.G. Fernlund, C.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/C03HBD_2320723b.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/13\/lawful-software-owners\/","url_meta":{"origin":264509,"position":5},"title":"Lawful Software Owners Allowed to Decompile Programs to Remedy Flaws that Impair the Software\u2019s Functionality | Top System SA v. Belgian State: A case comment","author":"Editor","date":"November 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Varun Goswami*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-114-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-114-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-114-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-114-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-114-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=264509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264509\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=264509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=264509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=264509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}