{"id":264118,"date":"2022-03-23T13:00:38","date_gmt":"2022-03-23T07:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=264118"},"modified":"2022-03-25T08:53:00","modified_gmt":"2022-03-25T03:23:00","slug":"how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the case where the division bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court allowed a review petition by merely stating that \u201cit is noticed that there is apparent error on the face of record which calls for interference\u201d, the bench of MR Shah<\/strong>* and BV Nagarathna, JJ observed that there must be a speaking and reasoned order as to what was that error apparent on the face of the record, which called for interference and therefore a reasoned order is required to be passed.<\/p>\n

\u201cUnless such reasons are given and unless what was that error apparent on the face of the record is stated and mentioned in the order, the higher forum would not be in a position to know what has weighed with the Court while exercising the review jurisdiction and what was that error apparent on the face of the record.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Court held that the impugned order allowing the review application was a cryptic, nonreasoned and non-speaking order as nothing been mentioned and\/or observed as to what was that error apparent on the face of the record which called for interference. Holding it to be unsustainable in law, the Court remanded the matter to the Division Bench of the High Court to decide the review application afresh, in accordance with law and on its own merits and within the parameters of the review jurisdiction and to pass a speaking and reasoned order within 3 months.<\/p>\n

The Court observed,<\/p>\n

\u201cIt cannot be disputed that the review jurisdiction can be exercised only in a case where it is found that there is an error apparent on the face of the record and not otherwise. Therefore, while exercising the review jurisdiction, the Court has to first satisfy itself on any error apparent on the face of the record which calls for exercise of the review jurisdiction. Merely stating that there is an error apparent on the face of the record is not sufficient. It must be demonstrated that in fact there was an error apparent on the face of the record.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

[Ratan Pal Singh v. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 340<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22.03.2022]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: In the case where the division bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court allowed a review petition by merely stating that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":264150,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[48918,48917,13291,20511,2897],"class_list":["post-264118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record","tag-non-reasoned-order","tag-practice-and-procedure","tag-reasoned-order","tag-Review"],"yoast_head":"\nHow will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the case where the division bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court allowed a review petition by merely stating that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-23T07:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-25T03:23:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/\",\"name\":\"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-23T07:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-25T03:23:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the case where the division bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court allowed a review petition by merely stating that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-23T07:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-25T03:23:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/","name":"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg","datePublished":"2022-03-23T07:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-25T03:23:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/how-will-the-higher-court-know-why-review-jurisdiction-was-exercised-courts-must-mention-what-was-that-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-the-record-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How will the higher Court know why review jurisdiction was exercised? Courts must mention what was that error apparent on the face of the record: SC\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/15\/mp-hc-no-reason-to-review-by-court-if-there-is-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-review-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":264118,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | No reason to review by court if there is no error apparent on the face of record; review petition dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of S.C. Sharma and Virender Singh, JJ., dismissed the review petition on the ground that no interference was required when there was no error apparent on the face of the record. A Public Interest Litigation Writ Petition was made by certain persons against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291009,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/section-34-of-arbitration-act-a-well-reasoned-arbitral-award-cannot-be-interfered-with-delhi-high-court-on-limited-scope-of-interference-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":264118,"position":1},"title":"[Section 34 of Arbitration Act] A well-reasoned arbitral award cannot be interfered with: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Arbitral Tribunal is a creature of Contract, and the Contract is the only basis on which the Learned Tribunal should adjudicate, apart from the general provisions of law and jurisprudence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":176824,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/19\/supervisory-jurisdiction-high-court-art-227-limited-narrow\/","url_meta":{"origin":264118,"position":2},"title":"Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 227 is limited and narrow","author":"Saba","date":"December 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Court recently dismissed a revision petition assailing the order of Addl. District Judge noting that in supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court, over subordinate Courts, the scope of judicial review is very limited and narrow. The order assailed by the petitioner was a consented order and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/doctrine-of-merger-not-attracted-by-dismissed-slp-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":264118,"position":3},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court with or without reasons, will not attract the Doctrine of Merger: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising the review jurisdiction, it must be borne in mind that review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and must strictly be confined to the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Doctrine of Merger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/10\/31\/court-rejects-nithari-killings-accused-surendra-koli-s-plea-for-review-of-his-death-sentence\/","url_meta":{"origin":264118,"position":4},"title":"Court rejects \u2018Nithari Killings\u2019 accused Surendra Koli\u2019s plea for review of his death sentence","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 31, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Considering the review petition seeking to review the death sentence and grant an open hearing to Surendra Koli, the chief accused of the ghastly Nithari Killings, the 3 Judge Bench comprising H.L. Dattu, C.J and A.R. Dave and S.A. Bode, JJ. rejected the petition stating that there is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-dismisses-review-application-for-lack-of-any-error-found-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-cannot-be-disguised-as-appeal-for-re-hearing\/","url_meta":{"origin":264118,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses review application for lack of any error found apparent on the face of record; cannot be disguised as appeal for re- hearing","author":"Editor","date":"July 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Fateh Deep Singh, J., dismissed a review application on the ground that no mistake or error was found on the records which would be self-evident, and any interpretation put forth by the applicant cannot be considered at this juncture according to Order 47 Rule 1\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=264118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264118\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/264150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=264118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=264118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=264118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}