{"id":263806,"date":"2022-03-17T09:00:56","date_gmt":"2022-03-17T03:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=263806"},"modified":"2022-03-25T09:15:32","modified_gmt":"2022-03-25T03:45:32","slug":"reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): <\/strong>The Coram of Justice Venugopal. M, Judicial Member and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member, held <em>that \u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present Company Appeal was focused on being dissatisfied with the order of the National Company Law Tribunal in rejecting the petition filed under Section 66(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and granting liberty to file a fresh application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The reason for the filing the company petition by the appellant was seeking an order confirming the reduction of share capital.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant\/company had sought relief to confirm the reduction of issued, subscribed and paid-up equity share capital of the petitioner company (appellant) as resolved by the Members in the Annual General Meeting by passing the special resolution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the pre-mordial plea of the appellant was that the NCLT had failed to appreciate the creeping in of an \u2018inadvertent typographical error\u2019 figuring in the extract of the Minutes of the Meeting characterizing the special resolution as a unanimous ordinary resolution. Moreover, the appellant had fulfilled all the statutory requirements of its own \u2018Articles of Association\u2019 which had resulted in the dismissal of the petition seeking approval of \u2018Reduction of Share Capital\u2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On behalf of the Respondents, it was represented that the members of the Appellant\/Company at the \u2018Annual General Meeting\u2019 that took place among other things resolved that pursuant to Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 and subject to other requisite approvals, the paid-up share capital of the Company would reduce from its present level of Rs 67,47,90,000\/- to Rs 4,90,00,000\/-.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis and Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Resolution passed in the \u2018Annual general Meeting\u2019 of the appellant\u2019s company under Section 66 of the Companies Act was found to be in order by the respondents. Registrar of Companies, Delhi found that the appellant had filed the said resolution keeping in tune with the ingredients of Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">A \u2018special resolution\u2019 is required to determine those matters for which the Act requires a \u2018special resolution\u2019 and except these matters in all other situations an \u2018Ordinary Resolution\u2019 is to be passed.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Conclusion<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tribunal after subjectively satisfying itself that the appellant has tacitly admitted its creeping in of typographical error in the extract of the minutes and also taking into consideration of 1<sup>st<\/sup> respondent\u2019s stand that the appellant had filed the special resolutions with it, which satisfied the requirement of Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 and allows the appeal by setting aside the impugned order passed by the NCLT, thereby confirming the reduction of share capital of the appellant.[Economy Hotels India Service (P) Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9LYPUYg9\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine NCLAT 653<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-8-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Tribunal:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Appellant: Mr. Sujoy Dutta, Mr. Satvinder Singh, Mr. NPS Chawla and Mr. Surek Kant Baxy, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondent: Mr. P S Singh, Advocate for ROC, Ms. Chetna Kandtal, Company Prosecutor for R1 and R2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Venugopal. M, Judicial Member and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member, held <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":262229,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[27634,29785,42834,22014,12521,36471,47463],"class_list":["post-263806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-companies-act","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-share-capital","tag-special-resolution"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-17T03:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-25T03:45:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-17T03:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-25T03:45:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":569,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Companies Act\",\"law\",\"Legal News\",\"NCLAT\",\"NCLT\",\"share capital\",\"Special Resolution\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Tribunals\\\/Commissions\\\/Regulatory Bodies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-17T03:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-25T03:45:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/NCLAT_New.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888,\"caption\":\"NCLAT\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/17\\\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT | SCC Times","description":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT","og_description":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-17T03:30:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-25T03:45:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT","datePublished":"2022-03-17T03:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-25T03:45:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/"},"wordCount":569,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","keywords":["Companies Act","law","Legal News","NCLAT","NCLT","share capital","Special Resolution"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/","name":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","datePublished":"2022-03-17T03:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-25T03:45:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","width":1331,"height":888,"caption":"NCLAT"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/18\/reduction-of-share-capital-is-a-matter-of-domestic-concern-nclat-confirms-reduction-of-the-share-capital-approved-by-the-shareholders-of-precious-energy-services-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":263806,"position":0},"title":"&#8220;Reduction of Share Capital is a matter of domestic concern&#8221;; NCLAT confirms reduction of the share capital approved by the shareholders of Precious Energy Services Ltd.","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): While deciding the instant appeal filed by Precious Energy Services Ltd., against the order of NCLT holding the reduction of share capital to be against the interests of the company; the Bench of Justice Anant Bijay Singh (Judicial Member) and Shreesha Merla\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199742,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":263806,"position":1},"title":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), dismissed an appeal filed by the Financial Creditor, holding it to be sans merit. The appeal was filed by the appellant Bank (Financial Creditor) against the order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201165,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":263806,"position":2},"title":"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed seeking reduction in penalty imposed on the defaulting company and its Directors. The penalty was imposed on the company and its Directors for defaulting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/11\/procedural-orders-directing-consolidation-of-related-petitions-not-appealable-under-section-421-of-companies-act-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":263806,"position":3},"title":"Procedural orders directing consolidation of related petitions not appealable under Section 421 of Companies Act: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT criticized the appellants for unnecessarily burdening the Tribunal with excessive documentation, voluminous records and citations of little value, thereby wasting Tribunal\u2019s resources and acting contrary to professional ethics.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":263806,"position":4},"title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT&#8217;s order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","author":"Ritu","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a matter concerning advancement of \u20b9360 crore loan by Hewlett Packard Enterprise India in violation of Section185 which only permit granting of loan for repayment of the loan and not for any other reason, the NCLT imposed \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/19\/nclat-shareholder-of-company-locus-stands-to-file-petition-under-s-2523-of-companies-act-for-revival-of-the-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":263806,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | Shareholder of company has locus standi to file petition under S. 252(3) of Companies Act for revival of the company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) observed that a shareholder of a company is entitled to file a petition for the revival of the company. The name of one\u00a0\"Venku Hospitals (P)Ltd.\" was struck off from the Register\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263806\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/262229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}