{"id":263627,"date":"2022-03-14T10:00:04","date_gmt":"2022-03-14T04:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=263627"},"modified":"2022-03-25T10:11:30","modified_gmt":"2022-03-25T04:41:30","slug":"raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Manindra Mohan Shrivastava CJ and Madan Gopal Vyas J. disposed of the petition and rejected the request to file rejoinder and kept it open to file a properly constituted petition.<\/p>\n

The instant writ petition was filed by the petitioners making certain allegations that works under MGNREGA have not been done as per the claim of the authorities and without proper work either having been completed or fully done, various bills have been raised and public fund has been siphoned.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that after going through the petition, we find that though there are allegations made in the petition, there is no prima facie <\/em>material along with the petition to sustain the allegations of the petitioners.<\/strong><\/p>\n

It was also stated that in the reply filed by the respondents, it is submitted that subsequent to filing of the petition, an enquiry on the complaints as made in the petition was carried out but complaints were found to be frivolous, baseless and politically motivated. The Divisional Commissioner order indicates that the enquiry was made after filing of the petition. The main grievance in the petition was that despite complaints being made, no enquiry was being conducted. Therefore, it appeared that some enquiry was made and order was passed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioners prayed that he may be permitted to place on record various materials to sustain his allegations by way of filing rejoinder.<\/p>\n

The Court held \u201cIf there are no specific allegations contained in the petition, it cannot be allowed to be supplied by way of rejoinder as that is not the scope of rejoinder.\u201d<\/p>\n

The court further kept it open for the petitioners to file a properly constituted petition to demonstrate by clinching material sustaining allegations of either work done, not done or not fully done, yet payments made under the MGNREGA scheme of the Government.[Sawai Singh Sodha v. State of Rajasthan, 2022 SCC OnLine Raj 525<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-03-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

Appearances<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s): Mr. Shyam Paliwal<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Beniwal<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Manindra Mohan Shrivastava CJ and Madan Gopal Vyas J. disposed of the petition and rejected <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[23034,29785,37346,30265,2509,48850],"class_list":["post-263627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-allegations","tag-law","tag-legal","tag-petition","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-rejoinder"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Manindra Mohan Shrivastava CJ and Madan Gopal Vyas J. disposed of the petition and rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-14T04:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-25T04:41:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-14T04:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-25T04:41:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Manindra Mohan Shrivastava CJ and Madan Gopal Vyas J. disposed of the petition and rejected","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-14T04:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-25T04:41:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/","name":"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-03-14T04:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-25T04:41:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/raj-hc-rejected-the-request-for-supply-of-rejoinder-in-absence-of-specific-allegations-in-the-petition-directed-to-file-a-properly-constituted-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC rejected the request for supply of rejoinder in absence of specific allegations in the petition; Directed to file a properly constituted petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":289129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/10\/lawyer-bodys-petition-filed-with-an-oblique-motive-to-vilify-judges-delhi-high-court-imposes-fine-of-inr-50000-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":263627,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court imposes fine of INR 50,000 for filing a petition with an oblique motive to vilify judges","author":"Editor","date":"April 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that \u201cthe petition was a mala fide attempt to throw mud on the reputation of the incumbent and is a gross abuse of process.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218642,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/26\/inx-media-case-sc-dismisses-p-chidambarams-plea-against-cbi-arrest-money-laundering-hearing-to-be-continued-tomorrow\/","url_meta":{"origin":263627,"position":1},"title":"INX Media Case| SC dismisses P Chidambaram’s plea against CBI arrest; Money Laundering hearing to be continued tomorrow","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0 The bench of R Banumathi and A S Bopanna, JJ has extended the protection from arrest given to former finance minister P Chidambaram in the INX Media money laundering case lodged by the Enforcement Directorate till Tuesday. The bench also dismissed the petition filed by senior Congress leader\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/30\/non-filing-of-affidavit-in-form-25-is-it-fatal-for-maintainability-of-election-petition-supreme-court-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":263627,"position":2},"title":"Non-filing of affidavit in Form 25; Is it fatal for maintainability of election petition? Supreme Court decides","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce there is an affidavit, albeit not in Form 25, the appropriate course would be to permit an affidavit to be filed in Form 25.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263298,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/09\/raj-hc-citizen-approaching-court-in-a-public-interest-jurisdiction-holds-greater-duty-to-make-full-research-pil-dismissed-due-to-lack-of-necessary-evidence-presented\/","url_meta":{"origin":263627,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | \u201cCitizen approaching Court in a public interest jurisdiction holds greater duty to make full research\u201d PIL dismissed due to lack of necessary evidence presented","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and Rekha Borana, J. dismissed the petition and kept it open for the petitioners to file a fresh public interest petition. A PIL was filed by the petitioners sustaining serious allegations with respect to mismanagement of respondent 2 Arth Credit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":317722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/19\/know-thy-judge-justice-manindra-mohan-shrivastava-42nd-chief-justice-of-rajasthan-high-court-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":263627,"position":4},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, the 42nd Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice M.M. Shrivastava was appointed by the President as new Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court on 02-02-2024 and took charge of his new office on 06-02-2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-Manindra-Mohan-Shrivastava-Rajasthan-High-Court-Chief-Justice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-Manindra-Mohan-Shrivastava-Rajasthan-High-Court-Chief-Justice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-Manindra-Mohan-Shrivastava-Rajasthan-High-Court-Chief-Justice.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Justice-Manindra-Mohan-Shrivastava-Rajasthan-High-Court-Chief-Justice.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/23\/judiciary-candidate-by-mistake-applied-as-dependent-of-freedom-fighter-allahabad-hc-allows-to-provisionally-appear-in-mains-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":263627,"position":5},"title":"Judiciary candidate by mistake applied as \u2018Dependent of Freedom Fighter\u2019; Allahabad High Court allows her to provisionally appear in mains exam","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court granted two weeks' time to UPPSC to file a reply and the candidate one week thereafter to file a rejoinder affidavit","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263627\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}