{"id":263395,"date":"2022-03-10T16:00:36","date_gmt":"2022-03-10T10:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=263395"},"modified":"2022-03-17T09:18:31","modified_gmt":"2022-03-17T03:48:31","slug":"mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Subodh Abhyankar and Satyendra Kumar Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal which was filed being aggrieved ofthe order passed by Single Judge wherein he quashed the earlier impugned order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate whereby custody of the children of the appellant was given to her husband (respondent 4). The Single Judge had only partly granted relief by not giving any express direction restoring the custody of the children in favour of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel appearing for the appellant had submitted that despite the petition being allowed and the impugned order being quashed, the appellant\/petitioner had got no relief as custody of her both the sons have not been given to her, despite the fact that their custody was illegally obtained by the respondent 4 in the first place.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel appearing for the respondent 4, on the other hand had opposed the prayer and it was submitted that no interference was called for as the aforesaid order had been passed by the Single Judge after having an interaction with the respondent 5 and 6, who had expressed their willingness to reside with their father the respondent 4 only.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court was of the view that it was true that both respondent 5 and 6 are minor, however, the age of 16 years is not such an age where a child, given a choice, is not able to make up his or her mind as to his or her inclination to reside with either of the parents. In the present case, this choice has been exercised in favour of the father and thus, despite agreeing with the contentions of the appellant\/petitioner regarding the legality of the impugned order, the Writ Court has not found it to be appropriate to hand over the custody of the children to the appellant\/petitioner\/wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that in the present case, it was nobody&#8217;s case that respondent 4 was in any manner incompetent or was having such vices which may prejudice the interest of the children in his company. Thus, the appeal was dismissed.[Jaya Chakravarti v. State of Madhya Pradesh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pGE7345H\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine MP 450<\/b><\/a>, decided on 02-03-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Shri Prateek Maheshwari, Counsel for the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Smt Archana Kher, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent 1 to 3\/State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Shri A. K. Saxena, Counsel for the respondent 4 to 6<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Subodh Abhyankar and Satyendra Kumar Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal which was filed being <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,3227,3229],"class_list":["post-263395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-custody","tag-minor"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Subodh Abhyankar and Satyendra Kumar Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal which was filed being\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-03-10T10:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-17T03:48:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-03-10T10:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-17T03:48:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Subodh Abhyankar and Satyendra Kumar Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal which was filed being","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-03-10T10:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-17T03:48:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/","name":"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-03-10T10:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-17T03:48:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/10\/mp-hc-technical-objections-cannot-come-in-way-of-custody-court-allows-16-year-old-to-choose-to-live-with-father\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Technical objections cannot come in way of custody; Court allows 16-year-old to choose to live with father"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/24\/endorsement-of-not-claimed-cannot-be-read-as-refusal-to-accept-the-service-of-summons-under-order-v-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":263395,"position":0},"title":"Endorsement of \u2018not claimed\u2019 cannot be read as \u2018refusal to accept\u2019 the service of summons under Order V CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. allowed an appeal filed by the appellant-wife challenging an ex-parte order passed by a District Judge under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. Vide the order impugned, custody of the minor girl aged 7 years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":82711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/29\/custody-of-a-minor-child-cannot-be-denied-to-a-working-mother\/","url_meta":{"origin":263395,"position":1},"title":"Custody of a minor child cannot be denied to a working mother","author":"Saba","date":"October 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Gujarat: While examining the legality and validity of the\u00a0 impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Family Court, the Bench comprising of\u00a0 M.R. Shah and A.S. Supehia, JJ., dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant father whereby he wanted the permanent custody of his minor son\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/08\/del-hc-earlier-order-of-maintenance-under-dv-act-is-no-bar-for-wife-claiming-maintenance-under-s-24-of-hindu-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":263395,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Earlier order of maintenance under DV Act is no bar for wife claiming maintenance under S. 24 of Hindu Marriage Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ. allowed an appeal filed by the appellant-wife against the order of the Family Court whereby two applications filed by her against the respondent-husband were dismissed. The appellant had filed two applications -- one under Section 24 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/custody-of-minor-girl-child-granted-to-mother-as-per-section-6-hmg-act-considerations-while-deciding-matters-reiterated-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":263395,"position":3},"title":"Custody of minor girl child granted to mother as per Section 6 HMG Act; considerations while deciding matters reiterated: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal seeking review of the family court order directing the custody of girl child to be given to her mother. The family court had granted custody of the girl child, aged 4 years,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260993,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/can-court-compel-a-parent-to-go-aboard-with-child-in-a-habeas-corpus-case-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":263395,"position":4},"title":"Can Court compel a parent to go abroad with child in a habeas corpus case? Supreme Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a habeas corpus case the Division Bench Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka*, JJ., held that in a case for custody of the child the rights of the parties to a custody dispute (parents) are irrelevant. However, adding an exception, the Bench stated, \u00a0\u201cWe may note here\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-68.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":62451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/20\/spouse-asserting-right-on-basis-of-interim-orders-in-child-custody-proceedings-cannot-be-allowed-to-withdraw-and-yet-continue-to-take-benefit-of-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":263395,"position":5},"title":"Spouse asserting right on basis of interim orders in child custody proceedings cannot be allowed to withdraw and yet continue to take benefit of order","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Hearing a child custody proceeding during which an interesting question arose for consideration, the Court observed that a spouse seeking custody of children under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, and obtaining interim orders cannot be allowed to withdraw from the proceedings and yet continue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=263395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/263395\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=263395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=263395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=263395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}