{"id":26301,"date":"2015-11-17T10:46:54","date_gmt":"2015-11-17T05:16:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=26301"},"modified":"2015-11-17T10:46:54","modified_gmt":"2015-11-17T05:16:54","slug":"cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arms Act, 1959 \u2014 Ss. 7, 20, 23, 25, 27 and 30 \u2014 Applicability of 1959 Act:<\/strong> Recovery of large quantity of unlicensed and unauthorised arms and ammunition from crew members of foreign vessel intercepted in Indian territorial waters, attracts provisions of Arms Act for initiating prosecution. [State of T.N. v. Mariya Anton Vijay, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_9_SCC_294\">(2015) 9 SCC 294<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 12 R. 6 \u2014 Power under \u2014 Nature of and Considerations for exercise of:<\/strong> Expression \u201cmay\u201d suggests power of court under Or. 12 R. 6 CPC is discretionary and cannot be claimed as of right. Judgment on admission is not a matter of right. Where defendants raised objections which go to root of the case, it would not be appropriate to exercise discretion under Or. 12 R. 6 CPC. [S.M. Asif v. Virender Kumar Bajaj, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_9_SCC_287\">(2015) 9 SCC 287<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 22 R. 10 \u2014 Continuance of suit against person on whom interest in suit property devolves during pendency of suit:<\/strong> Where the interest in the suit property has devolved upon the second defendant on the basis of the alleged gift deed, the suit may be continued against such second defendant. For the sake of continuance of the suit against the persons upon whom such interest has devolved during the pendency of the suit, leave of the court has to be obtained. Leave can be obtained only by that person upon whom interest has devolved during the pendency of the suit, otherwise, there may be preposterous results, as such a party might be unaware of the pending litigation and the same would not be consequently feasible. If a duty is cast upon him then in such an eventuality he is bound by the decree even in case of failure to apply for leave. Therefore, as a rule of prudence, the initial duty lies upon the person on whom such an interest has devolved upon any such property to apply for leave of the court in case the factum of devolution was within his knowledge or with due diligence could have been known by him. [Kirpal Kaur v. Jitender Pal Singh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_9_SCC_356\">(2015) 9 SCC 356<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2014 Ss. 227, 228 and 319 \u2014 Discharge:<\/strong> Remedy of discharge is not applicable in case of accused summoned under S. 319. Standard of proof employed for summoning a person as an accused under S. 319 CrPC, is higher than the standard of proof employed for framing a charge against an accused. Thus, it does not stand to reason that a person who is summoned as an accused to stand trial and added as such to the proceedings on basis of a stricter standard of proof can be allowed to be discharged from the proceedings on the basis of a lesser standard of proof such as a prima facie connection with the offence necessary for charging the accused. [Jogendra Yadav v. State of Bihar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_9_SCC_244\">(2015) 9 SCC 244<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (Determination of Network Tariff for City or Local Natural Gas Distribution Networks and Compression Charge for CNG) Regulations, 2008 \u2014 Regns. 3 and 4 \u2014 Validity:<\/strong> Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (Determination of Network Tariff for City or Local Natural Gas Distribution Networks and Compression Charge for CNG) Regulations, 2008 purportedly made under S. 22 of 2006 Act are ultra vires parent Act (Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006) since parent statute does not empower Board to fix any tariff of a consumer of natural gas. [Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board v. Indraprastha Gas Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_9_SCC_209\">(2015) 9 SCC 209<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Arms Act, 1959 \u2014 Ss. 7, 20, 23, 25, 27 and 30 \u2014 Applicability of 1959 Act: Recovery of large quantity of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":102451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arms Act, 1959 \u2014 Ss. 7, 20, 23, 25, 27 and 30 \u2014 Applicability of 1959 Act: Recovery of large quantity of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-17T05:16:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-17T05:16:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":557,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cases Reported\",\"SCC Weekly\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-17T05:16:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/scccover-28.1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/17\\\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2","og_description":"Arms Act, 1959 \u2014 Ss. 7, 20, 23, 25, 27 and 30 \u2014 Applicability of 1959 Act: Recovery of large quantity of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-11-17T05:16:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2","datePublished":"2015-11-17T05:16:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/"},"wordCount":557,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","articleSection":["Cases Reported","SCC Weekly"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/","name":"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","datePublished":"2015-11-17T05:16:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/17\/cases-reported-in-2015-scc-vol-9-october-28-2015-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cases Reported in 2015 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2015 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/2022-scc-vol-10-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":26301,"position":0},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 1","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Commercial Courts Act, 2015 \u2014 S. 12-A \u2014 Rejection of plaint for non-compliance with S. 12-A i.e. in cases where no urgent interim relief is sought, requirement of pre-institution mediation has not been complied with: S. 12-A of the 2015 Act, held, is mandatory. Any suit (where no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image79.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":206907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/rejection-or-renewal-of-arms-licence-must-be-based-only-on-the-grounds-given-under-section-14-of-the-arms-act-1959-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":26301,"position":1},"title":"Rejection or renewal of arms licence must be based only on the grounds given under Section 14 of the Arms Act, 1959: Kerala HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anu Sivaraman, J. allowed a civil writ petition seeking quashing of an order whereby petitioner\u2019s application for renewal of arms licence was rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr K.R. Sunil submitted that the reason stated for rejection was that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":31831,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/06\/2015-scc-vol-10-december-21-2015-part-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":26301,"position":2},"title":"2015 SCC Vol. 10 December 21, 2015 Part 4","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 6, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 Or. 37 R. 3 \u2014 Summary suit \u2014 Leave to Defend: Where the defendant has raised a triable issue or a reasonable defence, the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend. Leave is granted to defend even in cases where the defendant upon disclosing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":166064,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/01\/2017-scc-vol-9-october-28-2017-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":26301,"position":3},"title":"2017 SCC Vol. 9 October 28, 2017 Part 2","author":"Saba","date":"November 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Advocates \u2014 Government Law Officers\/Counsel\/Pleader \u2014 Cancellation of tenure-based appointment \u2014 Tenure expiring during pendency of appeal \u2014 Relief: In this case there was cancellation of appointments of respondents who were working as Additional GP\/AGP\/APP under Rule 30(5), Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointments, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984 vide\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/scccover-28.1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366333,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/12\/section-13-1a-cca-2015-supreme-court-rejection-of-plain-or-vii-rule-11-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":26301,"position":4},"title":"Order rejecting plaint under Or VII R 11 CPC is appealable under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court distinguished Bank of India v. Maruti Civil Works, 2023 SCC OnLine Bom 2667, noting that it dealt with orders under Order VII Rules 10 and 11(d) CPC, which are not appealable under Order XLIII CPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 13(1A) CCA 2015","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Section-131A-CCA-2015.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/25\/will-carrying-of-toy-gun-in-public-attract-s-25-of-arms-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":26301,"position":5},"title":"AP HC | Will carrying of toy gun in public attract S. 25 of Arms Act? Bail granted to a man giving stills as a hero with an air gun in a cinema theatre","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J., allowed the criminal petition and granted bail to the petitioners. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is 33 years who went to the cinema theatre on the date of release of a film along with one air gun\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26301\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/102451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}