{"id":262877,"date":"2022-03-02T09:00:32","date_gmt":"2022-03-02T03:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=262877"},"modified":"2022-03-02T12:38:42","modified_gmt":"2022-03-02T07:08:42","slug":"february-roundup-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/02\/february-roundup-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"82 Reports from 21 High Courts: Hijab Row, Uphaar Case, Child Custody Battles, Drug Menace and more | February RoundUp 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

82 reports on High Court Judgments to read from February 2022.<\/span><\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
\n

Allahabad High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Bail<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>22-year-old woman, burnt and buried due to demand of dowry: All HC denies bail to accused husband<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Noting the brutality with wife a 22-year-old lady and mother of a one year\u2019s infant child in causing her death, beating her cruelly by \u201cher husband\u201d Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, J. held that the said act was not only grave in nature but heinous also.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Law on S. 311 CrPC <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Power to the Court to summon a material witness or to examine a person present in Court or to recall a witness already examined: All HC discusses<\/span><\/h4>\n

Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J., while addressing a matter with regard to recalling of the witnesses expressed that, Section 311 of the Code confers a wide discretion on the Court to act as the exigencies of justice require.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Law on Recovery of Maintenance<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Limitation of 1 year for recovery of maintenance under S. 125(3) of CrPC and the law on enforcement to claim order of maintenance under S. 128 CrPC: All HC explains<\/span><\/h4>\n

Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., while addressing a matter regarding recovery of maintenance amount, expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201cSentencing to jail can only be seen as a means of recovering the amount of arrears and not a mode of discharging liability.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Andhra Pradesh High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

If the de facto complainant feels insulted as he was beaten in front of public and if he takes a hasty decision to commit suicide; will the accused be held responsible in the eyes of law?<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy J. partly allowed the petition by quashing FIR for the offence punishable under Sections 306 r\/w 116 IPC.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Bail<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

AP HC considered alleged attempt to threatening witness as a vague allegation; Cancellation of bail sought was rejected<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201c\u2026<\/strong>nothing was brought to the notice of the police or the investigating agency stating that the accused are interfering with course of investigation by way of threatening the witnesses through their men.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Bombay High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Law on Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

In a land dispute, a person subjected to grievous injury with the use of \u2018Khurpi\u2019: Will he be punished under S. 326 or 325 Penal Code, 1860? Bom HC explains<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and N.R. Borkar, JJ., upheld the decision of the Trial Court in a case of causing grievous injury voluntarily.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Bail<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Constant quarrels between husband and wife: Bom HC observes while granting bail to husband accused of dowry and cruelty<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sarang V. Kotwal, J., on noting that the husband and wife cannot live together and there were constant quarrels between them, granted bail to the husband who was accused under the provisions of Dowry Prohibition Act and Penal Code, 1860.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Provocation by Wife<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Wife subjected husband to humiliation by publicly calling him impotent and abusing him resulting in assault by husband: Husband will be convicted for murder or culpable homicide? Bom HC analyses<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ., modified the conviction of a husband who in provocation by wife on being subjected to abuses assaulted wife.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Abetment to Suicide<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Employer setting big targets, not granting leave and not accepting resignation would be acts in normal course of business: Bom HC grants anticipatory bail to employer accused of abetting suicide committed by employee<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Sarang V. Kotwal, J., addressed a matter wherein an employer was accused of abetting the suicide of an employee.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Law on Custody <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

9-year-old child prefers to stay with mother\u2019s father and his family members and shows animosity towards father: Whether father will get custody of child or not? Bom HC decides<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Addressing a matter wherein a child\u2019s mother was diagnosed with cancer due to which she started living at her parental home with the child, and after the passing of the mother, a custody battle arose between the father of the child and the father and brother of wife,\u00a0<\/strong>Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and N.J. Jamdar, JJ., noted animosity of the child towards his father, to which the Court expressed that, the same must have occurred due to \u2018parental alienation syndrome\u2019.<\/p>\n

Read more, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Appeal<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Appellate court can reverse the finding and sentence of the trial court ordering re-trial<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ. allowed an appeal against conviction of the Appellant by the Trial Court. The appellant was convicted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Penal Code, 1860, (\u201cIPC\u201d) read with Section 34 IPC. He was sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 15,000.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Transparency in Functioning<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Disqualification of Sarpanch in suspicion of benefitting her close relations by allotting work under Panchayat\u2019s order, without establishment of direct or indirect involvement as per S. 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act: Is it correct? Bom HC analyses<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Quoting a phrase from a story of a Roman Ruler Julius Caesar that, \u201cCaesar\u2019s wife should be above suspicion\u201d, Bharati H. Dangre, J., remarked that,<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026those who are vested with the powers are to be made more accountable and transparent in their functioning and subjected to social audit with a view to minimize their discretionary decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

COVID-19<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Cinema Halls, Theaters, Malls, Restaurants, etc. permitted to carry on business with 50% capacity but banquet halls\/Mangal Karyalaya & lawns not permitted with same capacity: Bom HC issues notice<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Anil L. Pansare, JJ., addressed a petition wherein a grievance was filed stating that an unreasonable classification resulting in impermissible discrimination had been made by the respondents as Cinema Halls, Theaters, Malls, Restaurants and also other establishments have been permitted to carry on their business or operations with 50% capacity of the customers or attendees, provided customers or attendees are armed with two doses of vaccination, and whereas, Mangal Karyalaya\/ Banquet Halls and Lawns where marriage functions are held and solemnised are not being permitted to carry on their business and operations with the same capacity of persons who have taken both the doses of vaccination.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Consumer Protection<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Consumer Protection Act requires State Government to constitute a State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and create circumstances to its effective functioning: Bom HC at Goa directs State of Goa to ensure filling up of vacant positions expeditiously<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Stating that the State Administration comprises several IAS Officers, the least expected out of them is to find the solution to problems, so that State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission functions effectively, The Division Bench of M.S. Sonak and R.N. Laddha, JJ., directed the State of Goa to ensure that the post of President and 3 other members of the Commission which are vacant be filled expeditiously.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dead Person<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Notice to a dead person under S. 148 of Income Tax Act cannot be issued: Bom HC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of K.R. Shriram and N.J. Jamdar, JJ., reiterated that notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to a dead person cannot be issued.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Legal Profession<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201cNotaries operating from public taxis around vicinity of Court\u201d: Dignity of the profession needs to be maintained and the legal profession cannot be allowed to function from the streets | Bom HC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ., requested the Department of Legal Affairs to give due consideration to this Court\u2019s Order and the Report dated 9-12-2021 submitted by Nausher Kohli, Advocate whilst enacting the Draft Bill.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Murder or Culpable Homicide?<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Husband killed wife brutally in a heat of passion leaving husband with a wounded pride: Bom HC decides whether the said offence will come under \u201cMurder\u201d or \u201cCulpable Homicide not amounting to Murder<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Stating that, in the moment of anger spouses almost forgot about the two children who were hardly three years old at the time of incident, the Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and Prithiviraj K. Chavan, JJ., found that the case of a husband killing wife with a knife was a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Arbitration<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Bombay HC rejects argument that a dispute cannot be referred for arbitration on account of fraud: Read why<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

B.P. Colabawalla, J., addressed an arbitration application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Gangubai Kathiawadi <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Can after certification granted by Board, public exhibition of a film be prohibited? Bom HC answers<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

In respect to petitions with regard to the release of movie Gangubai Kathiawadi, Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ and M.S Karnik, J., while expressing that \u201cOnce the film is granted a certificate by the competent statutory authority, i.e. the Board, the producer or distributor of the film has every right to exhibit the film in a hall unless, of course, the said certificate is modified\/nullified by a superior authority\/Court\u201d, held that, there cannot be any kind of obstruction for the exhibition of a film, which is certified, unless the said certificate is challenged and Court stays its operation.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Divorce<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

If husband and wife get their marriage registered under Special Marriage Act & under Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 as well, would this require them to get nullity of marriage under both Acts or one? Court decides<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

G.S. Kulkarni, J., expressed that, there is no provision under legislations, that if a marriage between the same couple is annulled under a competent law as enacted by the Parliament, it can as well be of a legal effect in the corresponding enactment.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Calcutta High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bail<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

S. <\/strong>37 of the NDPS Act mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act: Cal HC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Bibhas Ranjan De and Debangsu Basak, JJ., while addressing a bail application in a case under NDPS Act, remarked that,<\/p>\n

Section 37 of the NDPS Act mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Sexual Assault<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

14-yr old girl subjected to penetrative sexual assault by man who called her grand daughter: Is girl\u2019s complaint vital to form basis of conviction? Cal HC explains<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Joymalya Bagchi and Bivas Pattanayak, JJ., in a penetrative sexual assault case of a 14-year-old girl, expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201cCrime against woman is increasing as a whole. Such type of crime is a direct insult to the human dignity of the society and therefore imposition of any inadequate sentence not only results in injustice to the victim and the society in general but also stimulates criminal activities.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Trademark<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Disparagement or mere puffery? Court decides in matter of offending\/misleading advertisements [Dabur India v. Baidyanath Ayurved]<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Saraf, J. decided on a petition which was filed seeking remedy against impugned advertisements disparaging the goodwill and reputation of the petitioner and its product.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Chhattisgarh High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Jurisdiction<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Limited jurisdiction has been given to the High Court confined to the substantial question of law only<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Anoop Kumar Dhand J. dismissed the appeal as it does not fulfill the requirement mandated under Section 30 of Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, 1923.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

If the party is able to make out an exceptional case and the court finds irretrievable injustice would occur if writ jurisdiction is not invoked, High Courts do have the power to entertain the writ petition<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sam Koshy J. partly allowed the petition and partly disposed of the petition expressing no opinion on the termination notice issued against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Child Custody<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Due to father\u2019s field job, mother granted custody of child: Did Chh HC also grant contact and visitation right to father? Read<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

In a child custody battle, the Division Bench of Goutam Bhaduri and Rajani Dubey, JJ., reiterated the position of law in the Supreme Court\u2019s decision of\u00a0Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan<\/em>,\u00a0(2020) 3 SCC 67<\/a>, wherein it was held that the court cannot provide one happy home with two parents to the child then let the child have the benefit of two happy homes with one parent each, further this Court granted visitation and contact right to the father.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Desertion<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

If husband brings home concubine due to which wife leaves house, would that lead to desertion by wife? Chh HC explains<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Goutam Bhaduri and Rajani Dubey, JJ., expressed that,<\/p>\n

\u201cIf the husband keeps another lady; gives shelter to her; and proceeds to have child with the said lady and for that reason if the first wife has to leave the matrimonial home because of physical and mental torture meted out to her it cannot be presumed as a desertion on the part of wife.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Delhi High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Trademark Dispute<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Baazi v. WinZo | Trademark is used by a manufacturer or service provider to distinguish products from those of competitors: Here\u2019s how Winzo appeared dishonest and unfair in adopting Baazi<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201cWhen people are satisfied with the products supplied by a manufacturer or service provider, they buy them on the basis of the trade mark and over time it becomes popular and well known. Thus, the use of a similar or identical trademark by a competitor in the same product would lead unwary customers to believe that it originates from the same source.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Deadly Weapons<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Whether a \u2018blade\u2019 would be covered under S. 397 IPC as a deadly weapon? Del HC explains in view of settled position of law<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Mukta Gupta, J., explained under what circumstances would Section 397 of penal Code, 1860 would be attracted.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Law on Bail <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Investigation complete, charge sheet filed, accused in jail since 6 months: Read whether Del HC grants bail<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Dhari Singh, J., granted bail while referring to a catena of Supreme Court decisions with regard to the law on bail.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

4 years as undertrial, 2 witnesses examined out of 14, no probability of trial to be concluded in near future: Whether Del HC will grant bail to accused under S. 37(b)(ii) of NDPS Act? Read<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Chandra Dhari Singh, J., granted bail to an accused on being satisfied with \u201creasonable grounds\u201d as per Section 37 (b)(ii) of the NDPS Act, 1985.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Judicial Separation<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Can judicial separation be granted instead of divorce for which party has approached the Court? Read what Del HC says<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Expressing that the Family Court\u2019s decision was based on optimism and hope rather than the actual factual matrix of the case, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., while addressing a matter wherein matrimonial dispute occurred between the parties, observed that,<\/p>\n

\u201c..a decree of judicial separation can be rescinded by the same court; but a decree of divorce can be reversed only by a judicial order: either in review or in appeal. If it is passed\u00a0ex parte<\/em>, it may be recalled on an application being made for that purpose.”<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Money Laundering<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Money laundering offence under PMLA is, layered and multi-fold and includes stages preceding and succeeding offence of laundering money: Del HC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

While expressing the object of PMLA Act Chandra Dhari Singh, J., expressed that, offence of money laundering is threefold including the stages of placement, whereby the criminals place the proceeds of crime to the general and genuine financial system, layering, whereby such proceeds of crime are spread into various transactions within the financial system and finally, integration, where the criminals avail the benefits of crime as untainted money.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Uphaar Case <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Manner in which judicial records tampered revealed well-planned & methodical attempt to subvert justice system: Suspending sentence of Ansal brothers would amount eroding faith of public? Read Del HC\u2019s decision<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Stating that the manner in which Court records tampered was insidious and revealed a well-planned and methodical attempt to subvert the justice system in order to escape conviction in the Main Uphaar Case,\u00a0<\/strong>Subramonium Prasad, J., held that since the matter relates to tampering of judicial record, the same has to be decided expeditiously in order to ensure faith of the public in the judicial system.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Law on Review <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Expressing that,\u00a0Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review,<\/strong>\u00a0Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Eviction<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Group of leading artistes asked to vacate Government allotted premises under Discretionary Quota: Right to continue in public premises infinitely? Detailed report<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Expressing that a state of indecision could not have given rise to a legitimate expectation, Yashwant Varma, J., held that, while the petitioners undisputedly were illustrious and pre-eminent exponents in their respective fields of the classical arts, the Court was not shown any material which may justify the continued retention of public premises in Delhi or that they would be unable to propagate the classical arts in any other State or city of the nation.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Shared Household<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Where the residence is a shared household, would it create any embargo upon owner to claim eviction against his daughter-in-law? Read what Del HC says<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Yogesh Khanna, J., held that right of residence under Section 19 of the Domestic Violence Act is not an indefeasible right of residence in a shared household, especially when the daughter-in-law is pitted against aged father-in-law and mother-in-law.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Section 138 NI Act<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Vicarious Liability of Directors of Company for offences committed under S. 138 NI Act: Person claiming to not being able to manage business due to his age, could this be accepted as defence? Del HC answers<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Subramonium Prasad, J., addressed a matter pertaining to vicarious liability of directors of the company alleged for offences under Section 138 NI Act.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Passport<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Adoptive Father of a minor girl seeks issuance of her passport with details of adoptive parents so that she could write her TOEFL examination: Here\u2019s what Del HC directed<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Kameswar Rao, J., addressed a matter wherein a minor child was not able to apply for a passport either in the name of her biological parents or in the name of her adoptive parents, was unable to pursue her academics in the USA.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Other<\/strong><\/p>\n

Power under Article 227 of Constitution of India cannot be exercised to upset conclusions, howsoever erroneous they may be, unless there was something grossly wrong or unjust: Del HC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Asha Menon, J., while expressing the scope of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India dismissed the present petition.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Gujarat High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Will<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Opportunity of being heard needs to be granted; Court decided in matter of the Will of Guru Ranchhoddas<\/span><\/h4>\n

A.P. Thaker, J. decided over a petition wherein the case of the petitioner was that the properties in question were originaly private properties of Guru Keshavdas, and after the death of Guru Keshavdas, Guru Karsandas became the Mahant and succeeded the properties under his Will. On the death of Guru Karsandas his chela Guru Atmaram became Mahant and succeeded to the properties of Guru Karsandas under his Will dated 08.12.1941. Thereafter, Guru Atmaram died leaving his Will dated 06-05-1947, appointing Guru Ranchhodas as Chela.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Himachal Pradesh High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Couples have to make their choice at the threshold between career prospects and family life; HP HC observes in a case where a mother seeks job transfer to be with her daughter<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201c\u2026<\/strong>mandamus is a public remedy and this remedy lies, when a public authority fails to perform the duty entrusted to it by law.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inherent Power<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Instead of filing an appeal before the Sessions Court petitioner rushed to this Court invoking its inherent power. Can High Court exercise its inherent power? Read J&K and Ladakh HC\u2019s decision<\/span><\/h4>\n

Mohd. Akram Chowdhury, J., reiterated the settled position of law that if an alternate efficacious remedy is available under the statute, the inherent power of this Court cannot be invoked.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Jharkhand High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Lokayukta<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Does Lokayukta have power to pass directions upon disciplinary authority to take action against erring officials? Jharkhand HC elaborates in light of Jharkhand Lokayukta Act, 2001<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., addresses a very pertinent question of whether the Jharkhand Lokayukta Act, 2001 provides power for issuance of direction upon the disciplinary authority to take action against erring officials or can it\u2019s order be limited to a recommendation.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Kerala High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Cruelty<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Is not taking treatment for mental illness to bring out a peaceful family atmosphere a form of cruelty and thus, a ground for divorce? HC answers<\/span><\/h4>\n

In an interesting case the Division Bench of A.Muhamed Mustaque and C.R. Sophy Thomas, JJ., held that not taking treatment for mental illness in order to bring out a peaceful and harmonious family atmosphere can also be counted as cruelty to the persons at the receiving end.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

If Court finds that marriage failed due to incompatibility, but one of the parties withholds consent for mutual separation, would that be \u2018Cruelty\u2019? Kerala HC elaborates<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Expressing that, \u201cIf the conduct and character of one party causes misery and agony to the other spouse, the element of cruelty to the spouse would surface, justifying grant of divorce\u201d,\u00a0<\/em>the Division bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Sophy Thomas, JJ., held that, Court cannot leave the life of a spouse to the mercy of the opposite spouse.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Constitutional & Statutory Obligation<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Whether State empowered to reject medical reimbursement for treatment being from unrecognized department of recognized hospital? HC decides<\/span><\/h4>\n

Murali Purushothaman, J., held that there is a Constitutional as well a statutory obligation on the part of the State to bear the expenses for treatment of the government servant and his family.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Reservation<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201cMarrying a Christian man would not wipe off the benefit of reservation granted to a scheduled caste persons\u201d, HC reiterates caste of a person is to be decided on the basis of birth<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J., held that marrying a Christian man would not wipe off the benefit of a reservation granted to scheduled caste persons.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Corporal Punishment<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Teacher administering moderate and reasonable force to enforce discipline in classroom, can be exposed to criminal prosecution? Kerala HC answers<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

While explaining that inflicting corporal punishment on a Child by a parent or teacher is forbidden, Dr Kauser Edappagath, J., observed that,<\/p>\n

\u201cHurt of a less serious crime is not forbidden when inflicted in the reasonable chastisement of a child by a parent or by a school teacher.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Registration of Marriage<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

If a foreign embassy doesn\u2019t issue \u2018Single Status Certificate\u2019 or NOC of an OCI card holder, can Declarations and Certificates be accepted for registration of marriage in India? Ker HC answers<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

While addressing a matter wherein an Indian Citizen intended to soleminse and register his marriage with a British Citizen, an OCI card holder, N. Nagaresh, J., held that f a foreign Embassy does not issue a Single Status Certificate or NOC due to the law, rules and regulations prevailing in that country, Declarations or Certificates evidencing the same should be accepted in India for registration of marriage.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Tobacco at residence<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

If a person keeps tobacco at residence, would that amount to being an offence? Ker HC answers<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

While addressing a matter for an offence alleged under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, Juvenile Justice Act and Kerala Police Act, Dr Kauser Edappagath, J., expressed that mere keeping tobacco at residence would not amount to being an offence.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Admin of WhatsApp Group<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Can an Admin of a messaging service group be held criminally liable for the offensive content posted by member of a group? Kerala HC addresses<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

While addressing the question of whether the creator or administrator of a WhatsApp group is criminally liable for offensive content posted by a group member, Dr Kauser Edappagath, J., held that a person can be criminally liable for the acts of another if they are party to the offence.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Karnataka High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Hijab Case <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

When Karnataka High Court temporarily restrained students from wearing hijab, religious flags, saffron shawls, etc.: Read Court\u2019s interim order<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

While expressing that,\u00a0\u201cEndless agitations and closure of educational institutions indefinitely are not happy things to happen\u201d<\/em>, the Bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ and Krishna S Dixit and JM Khazi, JJ.,\u00a0restrained all the students regardless of their religion or faith from wearing saffron shawls (Bhagwa), scarfs, hijab, religious flags or the like within the classroom, until further orders.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Sentence<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Conviction sentence not to affect career and not be treated as a remark for employment; Kar HC confined the sentence to fine only in accordance with Ss. 279 and 337 IPC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J., disposed of the petition and modified the judgment of the appellate court.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

GST Exemption<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Whether GST exemption can be claimed for leasing out residential premises as hostel to students and working professionals? Kar HC answers<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and M.I. Arun, JJ., addressed whether GST exemption can be claimed for leasing of residential premises as a hostel to students and working professionals.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Madras High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Negotiable Instruments Act<\/span><\/h4>\n

Whether proceedings under Ss. 138 and 141 of NI Act can be initiated against corporate debtor during moratorium period? Madras HC answers<\/span><\/h4>\n

Sathish Kumar, J., while addressing a matter with regard to the dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, held that the moratorium provision contained in Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, would apply only to corporate debtor, but the natural persons mentioned in Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act continue to be statutorily liable under Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instrument Act.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Religious Practice<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201cOne of the basic tenets to be followed by every Hindu is tolerance. Tolerance must be his own community or religion and in particular, to also to every other religious practice\u201d: Madras HC<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201cFundamental Rights and Duties are sacrosanct and binding on the Courts which adjudicate issues relating to the religion.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>MBBS Seat<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

CBI\u2019s self-contained note cannot form basis for rejecting application for increase of MBBS Seat; HC directs NMC to consider the application afresh<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Arun Kumar Sharma, JJ., quashed the National Medical Commission\u2019s decision rejecting L.N. Medical College & Research Centre\u2019s application for increase of MBBS seats.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Writ of Mandamus<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Provision for redressal of grievance in matter of radiation by mobile tower exists; Permission for installation can\u2019t be revoked<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Nandita Dubey, J. heard a petition which was filed seeking issuance of the writ of mandamus to the respondents to take appropriate effective steps against the Reliance Telecom Services not to permit them for installation of the mobile tower in the premises of Jai Hind School, V.V. Giri Ward, Pipariya.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Departmental Inquiry<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Desirable to stay the departmental proceedings till conclusion of the criminal case; Court prohibits Department to continue inquiry<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Atul Sreedharan, J. decided on a petition which was filed by the petitioner who was aggrieved by the departmental proceedings against him on the identical charges by the CBI in the criminal case.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Land Acquisition<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

What would be an appropriate factor by which market value of land was to be multiplied to assess the compensation in the case where the land was situated in the rural area? [NH- 148N land acquisition]<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Vivek Rusia and Rajendra Kumar Verma, JJ. took up a bunch of petitions which had similar facts that the petitioners were owners of agricultural land that came under the acquisition for construction of 12 lanes Delhi-Mumbai Expressway i.e. NH-148N under the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956 (\u2018the NH Act of 1956\u2019).\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Acquittal<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Unless the acquittal in criminal trial is honourable\/clean, the employer has enough discretion to find a candidate to be unfit for employment<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Sheel Nagu and Sunita Yadav, JJ. while hearing a petition under Article 227 against order the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench., dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Meghalaya High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Meghalaya Civil Service and the Meghalaya Police Service<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

There is no question of apples and orange being put in the same basket: Court calls State\u2019s action foolish and justification of such act real tragedy<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sanjib Banerjee, CJ. while deciding in the matter between groups of persons in the Meghalaya Civil Service and the Meghalaya Police Service, pertaining to seniority between or among them, disposed the writ petition in favour of petitioners.<\/p>\n

Read report, here…<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Rape Case | Confession<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Unequivocal confession leads to dismissal of appeal in a Rape case with minor<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division bench of Sanjib Banerjee, CJ. and W. Diengdoh, J. dismissed the appeal which was filed on behalf of the convict with counsel engaged by the Legal Services Authority.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Police Service<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

\u201cIt is elementary that when the law requires a certain thing to be done in a particular manner, it has to be done in such manner or not at all\u201d; Court upholds the dismissal of police official for passing information to outlaws<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

\u201c….the appellant had links with the banned outfit and had passed on information about police movements and operations to the outlawed organisation\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Orissa High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Ever-growing stock of seized vehicles<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

PIL filed about the ever-growing stock of seized vehicles and other properties in the various police stations in the State of Odisha; Directions issued<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Muralidhar, CJ. issued directions regarding the ever-growing stock of seized vehicles and other properties in the various police stations in the State of Odisha<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Drug Menace<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201cDrug menace has become deep rooted and is taking its toll like a slow poison for the young generation\u201d; HC expresses anguish over callously casual approach of officers<\/span><\/h4>\n

In a case exposing callous attitude of authorities while dealing with drug menace in the State of Punjab, Meenakshi I. Mehta, J., observed that in some paras of the Statu sreports\/Reply, the police officers concerned had mentioned the tablets, allegedly recovered as \u2018CLAVIDOL-100 SR\u2019 whereas in certain other paras the same had been described as \u2018CLOVIDOL-100 SR\u2019. Criticizing the lackadaisical attitude of officers, the Bench remarked\u2026<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

State of Punjab which was known as one of the prosperous States is now at the brink of drug-trafficking<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Expressing that,\u00a0State of Punjab which was known as one of the prosperous States is now at the brink of drug-trafficking<\/em>, Harnaresh Singh Gill, J., held that in order to curb the menace of drug trafficking the accused person are to be dealt with stringently even at the stage of granting her\/him bail in NDPS Act cases involving commercial quantity.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Patna High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Mental Health<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Mental health of a person and\/or treatment of those who are in need, more so during the time of Covid-19, is the least priority of the State Government<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ and S. Kumar, J., directed the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar to take all steps ensuring the establishment of State Mental Health Authority as per Section 45 of the Mental Health Care Act, 2017.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Rajasthan High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Compensation | Motor Vehicle <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Money cannot substitute a life lost but an effort has to be made for grant of just compensation having uniformity in approach; Court observes in a MV accident case demanding higher compensation<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Birendra Kumar J. allowed the appeal and enhanced the award considering the settled guidelines in the subsequent judgments to reach at \u201cjust compensation\u201d.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Customs Act<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

DRI officer is not Competent Authority to issue show cause notice and adjudicate the same as \u201cproper officer\u201d; Show cause notice set aside<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

A Division Bench of Akil Kumar, CJ and Sameer Kureshi, J. allowed the writ petition and set aside the proceedings issued by show cause notice and subsequent demands confirmed by OIO.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Rajasthan Public Service Commission<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

It would be open for RPSC to conduct written main examination on the rescheduled date, Single Judge bench order stayed<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi CJ and Sudesh Bansal J. stayed the impugned judgment and left it open for RPSC to conduct a written main examination on the rescheduled date.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Compassionate Appointment<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201c\u2026on the ground of delay itself, the heir of the deceased employee shall not be entitled to appointment on compassionate ground.\u201d; Raj HC observes in a case where delay is of almost 13 years<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

A Division Bench of Manindra Mohan Srivastava and Anoop Kumar Dhand, JJ. dismissed the petition on the ground that the writ petition filed by the petitioners is without any substance.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Transfer<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Accepting requests for inter-district transfer can lead to chain reaction and at times considerable administrative difficulties; Raj HC observes while dealing a case related to inter-district transfer<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

A Division bench of Akil Kureshi CJ and Madan Gopal Vyas J. dismissed the petition stating that nothing would come in the way of the petitioner in seeking inter-district transfer if the Government rules and regulations recognize any such policy.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Tripura High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Qualifying Examination<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

No grievance for non-selection; Court finds criteria fixed by ONGC clear and categorical<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. dismissed a petition which was filed by the petitioner who was appointed as Junior Security Supervisor at (A-1 Level) in the category of Scheduled Tribe and had appeared for the computer-based test and physical standard test conducted by the ONGC. It was alleged that in the selection process the petitioner was awarded 72 marks but was not selected whereas the candidate (respondent 3) who got only 66.10 marks was wrongly and illegally selected by the respondent 2.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Conjugal Rights<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Whether maintenance granted to the wife under S. 125 CrPC can be cancelled in view of husband\u2019s obtaining a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and wife\u2019s refusal for the same?<\/span><\/h4>\n

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., decided on a petition which was filed by the petitioner challenging order passed by the Additional Judge, Family Court which stated that the petitioner was not entitled to any maintenance allowance under section 125 Cr.P.C from her husband in view of her refusal to restore conjugal relationship with her husband pursuant to the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge for restitution of conjugal rights.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Bail<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Tests provided under S.37(1)(ii) of the NDPS Act should qualify in order to seek bail; Court rejects application<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., rejected a bail application which was filed for releasing the accused on bail who had been undergoing imprisonment since 16-09-2021 under NDPS Act, 1985. Successive applications of the accused for pre-arrest bail were rejected.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Die-in-Harness Scheme<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. decided over a bunch of petitions which had a similar question pertaining to exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Migratory Birds<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

More than 1000 \u2018Rare\u2019 Birds dead, no carcasses found; Court directs committee inspection<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Division Bench of S.G. Chattopadhyay and Indrajit Mahanty, JJ., took up a PIL which was filed on the basis of press reports that in the Sukhsagar water body of Udaipur, Khilpara, large number of migratory birds of more than 1000 in numbers were found dead. Notices were issued and following the directions of this Court a report had come to be filed by the State wherein the State had taken note of the fact that many migratory birds come and find sanctuary in water bodies in the State of Tripura and they come all the way from Spain, Portugal, South East France, Italy and North Western Africa and have all been listed as \u201cRare\u201d birds by the European Union, but it seems that the same has been detailed as localized by the State.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Uttaranchal High Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Right to Information<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Husband seeking personal information such as salary of wife under Right to Information Act, 2005; Whether acceptable or not?<\/span><\/h4>\n

\u201c\u2026.The only exception as to the information given under the Act under Section 8 of the RTI Act, is an exemption from disclosure of information.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Termination of Pregnancy<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Compelling to continue pregnancy, infringement under Art. 21; Rape victim allowed to terminate Intrauterine Fetus of 28 weeks 5 days<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Alok Kumar Verma, J., decided on a petition which was filed by the father of the minor petitioner to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent to ensure immediate medical termination of petitioner\u2019s pregnancy after taking all precautions as required to be taken medically and legally.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bail<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Denial of bail on sole ground of apprehension that he may commit crime again, overturned by the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

R.C. Khulbe, J. granted bail in a criminal revision petition moved against the order of Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), Dehradun as well as a judgment by Addl. Sessions Judge (POCSO)\/FTC, Dehradun against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Read report, here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

8 Legal Stories of the Week: From High Courts to District Courts<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n