{"id":262437,"date":"2022-02-25T12:00:01","date_gmt":"2022-02-25T06:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=262437"},"modified":"2022-03-04T08:54:08","modified_gmt":"2022-03-04T03:24:08","slug":"balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court:<\/strong> Ravindra Maithani, J. dismissed an appeal that challenged an order given by the court of Civil Judge pertaining to cancellation of gift deed.<\/p>\n

Appellant was aggrieved by that part of order by which an ad-interim injunction was not granted. He had purchased an agricultural property in the year 1989 and his father, Manmohan Thapar constructed a resort thereupon. In the year 2007, father insisted for construction of the resort, but the appellant was not in a position to undertake that task at that point of time. He insisted the appellant and his brother to transfer the shares in the property, in his favour to facilitate the requisite permission and licenses for construction of resort and the same were transferred on 13-04-2007.<\/p>\n

In the year 2015, the appellant came to know about the marriage of Manmohan Thapar with the respondent, who was working as a Secretary with Manmohan Thapar. Respondent furnished herself as unmarried, though she was married and had a child. Manmohan Thapar expired on 26-07-2019 and the appellant came to know about his will dated 18-11-2006 in the year 2019. The property was mutated in the name of respondent on the basis of the gift deed dated 27-02-2013.<\/p>\n

The suit was filed for the cancellation of the Gift deed as also for permanent injunction. The appellant also moved an application under Order 39 Rules 1& 2 of the Code. The Court below observed that there was no ground to grant ex-parte ad-interim-injunction and issued notice.<\/p>\n

The appellant and his brother transferred their shares in the property to him in the year 2007. Therefore, it was argued that this will was not genuine.<\/p>\n

When they came to know about the gift deed, the respondent mutated her name in the revenue records. It was the case that mutation was done on the basis of gift deed which was allegedly executed sometimes in the year 2013. The respondent was recorded tenure holder.<\/p>\n

Without making any further observation with regard to merits of the case, the Court was of the view that the Court had not committed any error in denying to issue ex-parte temporary injunction to the appellant. The appeal was dismissed.[Samir Thapar v. Tiny Kesag Ligtsang Thapar, 2022 SCC OnLine Utt 68<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-02-2022]<\/p>\n

\n

Mr U. K. Uniyal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.<\/p>\n

Mr V. S. Rathore, AGA for the State<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: Ravindra Maithani, J. dismissed an appeal that challenged an order given by the court of Civil Judge pertaining to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33977,2943,17331],"class_list":["post-262437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deed","tag-injunction","tag-will"],"yoast_head":"\nUtt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-25T06:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-04T03:24:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-25T06:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-04T03:24:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction | SCC Times","description":"Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction","og_description":"Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-25T06:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-04T03:24:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/","name":"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-02-25T06:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-04T03:24:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/25\/balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-to-be-proved-in-order-to-seek-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to be proved in order to seek ex-parte ad-interim-injunction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/08\/grant-of-injunction\/","url_meta":{"origin":262437,"position":0},"title":"Megh HC | Grant of injunction cannot be claimed by a party as a matter of right nor can it be denied by the Court arbitrarily; Court dismisses petition on the question of effective possession","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H. S. Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court by way of this application under Order 6 of Meghalaya (Jurisdiction over District Council Courts) Order, 2014. The appellant claimed that he was running a hostel in a building\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215823,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/raj-hc-temporary-injunction-not-granted-when-there-was-an-irreparable-loss-to-the-party-against-whom-it-was-prayed\/","url_meta":{"origin":262437,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Temporary injunction not granted when there was an irreparable loss to the party against whom it was prayed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sabina, J. dismissed the appeal on the ground that party will suffer an irreparable loss if the application was allowed.\u00a0 An appeal was made challenging the order which was made on an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and\u00a0 2 read with Section 151 of Code of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204507,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/29\/party-within-his-rights-to-cancel-a-conditional-transfer-deed-executed-for-consideration-before-completion-of-condition-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":262437,"position":2},"title":"Party within his rights to cancel a conditional transfer deed executed for consideration before completion of condition: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of Arun Mishra and Indira Banerjee, JJ. allowed an appeal while setting aside the judgment and order of the Kerala High Court concerning a \u2018gift deed\u2019. In the present case, the facts of the case are that the appellant executed a purported gift deed in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/son-in-law-and-his-right-on-father-in-laws-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":262437,"position":3},"title":"Son-in-law and his right on Father-in-laws property | Claim that he was adopted as a member of family subsequent to marriage with daughter: Know what Ker HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: N. Anil Kumar, J., decided a matter wherein the son-in-law claimed his right on father-in-law\u2019s property while pleading that he was adopted by his wife\u2019s family after marriage and hence had a right on the property. Plaintiff aged 69 years was the respondent in the appeal claiming\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":280096,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/21\/delhi-high-court-institution-running-a-charitable-hospital-on-public-land-was-made-to-suffer-the-rigors-of-cancellation-of-lease-deed-and-vacation-of-property-is-a-travesty-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":262437,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court | Cancellation of lease deed of Institution running a charitable hospital on public land a travesty of justice","author":"Editor","date":"December 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It is travesty of justice that an institution contributing for noble cause being that of running a charitable hospital on a public land and providing for sound research and treatment facilities has been made to suffer the rigors of cancellation of the Lease Deed and vacation of the property. Being\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":269151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/28\/extent-existence-and-expiry-of-interim-orders-a-judicial-enigma-part-i\/","url_meta":{"origin":262437,"position":5},"title":"Extent, Existence and Expiry of Interim Orders – A Judicial Enigma [Part I]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Siddharth R. Gupta\u2020 and Mayank Bansal\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 51","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-295.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262437"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262437\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}