{"id":261844,"date":"2022-02-16T17:00:54","date_gmt":"2022-02-16T11:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=261844"},"modified":"2022-02-25T09:56:05","modified_gmt":"2022-02-25T04:26:05","slug":"review-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/","title":{"rendered":"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Expressing that, <strong><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review,<\/span><\/strong> Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A review petition was filed wherein the petitioners\/defendant submitted that order of the Court dated 7-1-2022 allowing in part the application moved by the respondent\/plaintiff under Order XI Rules 2 and 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1907 was liable to be reviewed, as erroneous directions were issued on the basis of an erroneous understanding of the facts of the matter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioners\/defendants were gravely aggrieved by the directions issued by this Court to produce their third-party agreements, since the findings on the basis of which, the directions were issued, were contrary to the submission made by the parties.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis, Law and Discussion<\/span><\/h4>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">\u201cScope of a review is extremely limited.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The errors raised by the petitioners\/defendants required the Court to delve into the materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating the materials and further, decide the application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench found the Senior Counsel\u2019s submission to be right, that such a course of action as stated above would be relevant in an appeal.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">\u201cAn error which is not self-evident and has to be detected by a process of reasoning cannot be described as an error apparent on the face of the record, justifying the court exercising its power of review.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court also observed that, fresh and additional material cannot be pressed into service to seek a review of an order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench added that the normal principle is that what is pronounced by the Court is final, else, there must be some manifest wrong caused leading to miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #333399;\">Settled Law<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A review can by no means be an appeal in disguise where an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, as has been sought to be urged in the present matter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #333399;\">Review or Appeal?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court noted that the emphasis had been on the erroneous understanding of the pleadings of the parties which resulted in erroneous conclusions, hence rehearing was not possible to correct all the said \u201cerrors\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above, Court stated that \u201cError\u201d has to be an error apparent on the face of the record to attract the provisions of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC and must be a patent error which alone can be looked into in review proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court also reiterated the summary of principles governing review petitions as laid down in <em>Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NQHiT615\">(2013) 8 SCC 320<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Considering the above-stated decision, Bench held that no interference was needed for exercising review jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, in view of the above discussion, the review petition was dismissed. [Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Vivo Mobile Communication Co. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NVw8sP30\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Del 470<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-2-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Advocates before the Court:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For the Plaintiff:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chander Lall, Senior Advocate with Ashutosh Kumar, Swamil Dey, Vrinda Bagaria, Munesh Sharma, Vinod Chauhan and Ananya Chugh, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For the Defendants:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Saikrishna Rajagopal, Julien George, Anu Paarcha, Arjun Gadhoke, Avijit Kumar, Aniruddh Bhatia, Skanda Shekhar, N. Parvati &amp; Vivek Ayyagari, Advocates for D-1 &amp; D-2<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nupur Aggarwal &amp; Maanav Kumar, Advocates for D-3<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":260899,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,2543,48633,29785,42834,2897],"class_list":["post-261844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-asha-menon","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-Review"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-16T11:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-02-25T04:26:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-16T11:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-25T04:26:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":581,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/01\\\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"Justice Asha Menon\",\"law\",\"Legal News\",\"Review\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/\",\"name\":\"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/01\\\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-16T11:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-25T04:26:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/01\\\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/01\\\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/16\\\/review-jurisdiction\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light | SCC Times","description":"Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light","og_description":"Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-16T11:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-02-25T04:26:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light","datePublished":"2022-02-16T11:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-25T04:26:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/"},"wordCount":581,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","keywords":["Appeal","Delhi High Court","Justice Asha Menon","law","Legal News","Review"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/","name":"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","datePublished":"2022-02-16T11:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-25T04:26:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Expressing that, Minor mistakes of inconsequential importance are insufficient to seek a review, Asha Menon, J., elaborated that, while seeking review of orders passed in a Civil Suit, the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC have to be satisfied, which would not equate the hearing with the original hearing of the case or a hearing in an appeal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/review-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Law on Review | Can review be sought wherein Court has to delve into materials, apply its mind afresh after re-evaluating materials? Del HC throws light"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/07\/sc-collegium-recommends-4-judicial-officers-to-be-appointed-as-judges-of-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":261844,"position":0},"title":"SC Collegium recommends 4 Judicial Officers to be appointed as Judges of Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for appointment of following four Judicial Officers as Judges of the Delhi High Court: Shri Talwant Singh, Rajnish Bhatnagar Ms Asha Menon Shri Brijesh Sethi On the basis of interaction and having regard to all relevant factors, the Collegium is of the considered view that S\/Shri (1) Talwant Singh,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/delhi-hc-orders-of-appointment-of-4-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":261844,"position":1},"title":"Delhi HC | Orders of appointment of 4 Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"President is pleased to appoint the following as the Judges of the Delhi High Court: Talwant Singh Rajnish Bhatnagar Asha Menon Brijesh Sethi [Notification dt. 22-05-2019] Ministry of Law and Justice","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256068,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/26\/law-on-testamentary-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":261844,"position":2},"title":"Law on Testamentary Proceedings | Prior to proving a Will, its execution is to be proved first by an attesting witness? Del HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., explained the concept of proving a Will by an attesting witness. The chamber appeal was preferred by the appellants contesting the order passed by Joint Registrar permitting the attesting witness to be examined prior to the petitioner. Analysis, Law and Decision High Court concluded\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236527,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/30\/del-hc-surprised-at-advocates-moving-court-for-legal-opinion-hc-dismisses-application-under-s-151-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":261844,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;Surprised&#8221; at advocates moving Court for legal opinion, HC dismisses application under S. 151 CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon, JJ., dismissed an application filed under Section 151 CPC expressing surprise that advocates moved the application seeking the legal opinion of the Court. The present application was filed invoking Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279604,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/14\/delhi-high-court-when-a-prayer-to-appoint-an-arbitrator-has-been-heard-and-rejected-the-same-relief-cannot-be-sought-by-filing-a-review-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":261844,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court | When a prayer to appoint an Arbitrator has been heard and rejected, the same relief cannot be sought by filing a review petition","author":"Editor","date":"December 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Mere expression \u201cplace of arbitration\u201d cannot be the basis to determine the intention of the parties that they have intended that place as the \u201cSeat of Arbitration\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":198318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/09\/review-petition-of-the-nirbhaya-gangrape-convicts-dismissed-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":261844,"position":5},"title":"Review petition of the \u2018Nirbhaya\u2019 Gangrape convicts dismissed: Supreme Court [Judgment]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere has to be an error apparent on the face of\u00a0record\u00a0leading to miscarriage of justice to exercise the review jurisdiction under Article 137.\u201d Supreme Court:\u00a0While envisaging the essence of Article 137 of the Constitution of India by stating that\u00a0\u201cArticle 137 empowers the Supreme Court to review any judgment pronounced or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261844\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/260899"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}