{"id":261411,"date":"2022-02-10T11:00:54","date_gmt":"2022-02-10T05:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=261411"},"modified":"2022-02-18T10:02:22","modified_gmt":"2022-02-18T04:32:22","slug":"tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tripura High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. decided over a bunch of petitions which had a similar question pertaining to exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the lead matter was that mother of respondent was a Group-D staff in the office of the Superintendent of Police (Procurement) under the Department of Home, Government of Tripura. She got the job on compassionate ground since her husband Shekhar Chakraborty died while in service. She expired on 07-11-2016 leaving behind two daughters. One of the daughter applied to the State Government seeking appointment on compassionate ground as per the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government. Since her application was kept pending without any decision, she filed petition in the court in front of Single Judge and an order was passed with directions to the respondents to consider her representation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pursuant to which State respondents considered the representation and passed an order rejecting respondent\u2019s application on the ground that as she was a married daughter she was not eligible to compassionate appointment under die-in-harness scheme. This order was again challenged. Single Judge held that portion of the notification dated 19.05.2017 making exclusion of married daughters from the purview of the die-in-harness scheme was unconstitutional and directed the State respondents (appellants herein) to consider the application. Thus, the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court explained that very object of die-in-harness scheme is to provide urgent relief to mitigate the hardships arising out of the death of the earning member of the family. Numerous situations can be contemplated where there may be none other than the married daughter to support the family of the deceased Government servant. Such a situation having arisen, object of the die-in-harness scheme to relieve the family of the deceased Government servant of emergent financial crisis by providing compassionate appointment to an eligible member would be frustrated if the married daughter, who is otherwise eligible for such appointment, is kept beyond the purview of the scheme only on the basis of her marital status. <em>Marriage does not break the bond between a daughter and her parents as it does not do between a son and his parents. A crisis in the family of her parents equally worries a married daughter. As such, there is no rationale behind exclusion of a married daughter from the scheme<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court concluded that a die-in-harness policy inasmuch as it operates as a disqualification in the case of a married woman, as against a married man must be held to be discriminatory and such policy, tested on the touchstone of Articles 14 to 16 of the Constitution, cannot be held to be valid. Appeal was dismissed with directions to consider the applications for compassionate appointment received from the respondents afresh.[State of Tripura v. Debashri Chakraborty, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Rgc55FKZ\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine Tri 58<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-02-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Appellant(s): Mr D. Bhattacharya, GA. Mr M. Debbarma, Addl. GA. Mr Soumyadeep Saha<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondent(s): Mr P. Roy Barman, Sr. Adv., Mr Somik Deb, Sr. Adv., Mr H.K. Bhowmik, Mr Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Mr K. Nath and\u00a0 Mrs R. Chakraborty<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. decided over a bunch of petitions which had <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[28754,35428,2626],"class_list":["post-261411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compassionate-grounds","tag-die-in-harness","tag-married_daughter"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. decided over a bunch of petitions which had\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-10T05:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-02-18T04:32:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-10T05:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-18T04:32:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses","og_description":"Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. decided over a bunch of petitions which had","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-10T05:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-02-18T04:32:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/","name":"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-02-10T05:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-18T04:32:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/tri-hc-exclusion-of-married-daughters-from-the-die-in-harness-scheme-of-the-state-government-discriminatory-court-discusses\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Exclusion of married daughters from the die-in-harness scheme of the State Government discriminatory? Court discusses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/17\/excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-art-14-15-and-16-rajasthan-high-court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion\/","url_meta":{"origin":261411,"position":0},"title":"Excluding married daughters from compassionate appointment violative of Art. 14, 15 and 16; Rajasthan High Court overrules judgments supporting exclusion","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Yardstick, for extending the benefit of compassionate Appointment should be dependency of the dependents on the deceased government servant and, therefore, their marital status only should not be an impediment for consideration on compassionate ground.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Excluding-married-daughters-from-compassionate-appointment-violative-of-Art.-14-15-and-16-Rajasthan-High-Court-overrules-judgments-supporting-exclusion-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283464,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/rejection-of-compassionate-appointment-for-married-daughters-violative-of-articles-14-and-15-punjab-haryana-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":261411,"position":1},"title":"Rejection of Compassionate Appointment for married daughters violative of Articles 14 and 15: Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The division bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court noted that the object of such schemes is to grant appointments to dependent family members falling under specific categories on compassionate grounds.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image42.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":297879,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/regardless-of-their-marital-status-daughters-may-apply-for-compassionate-appointments-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":261411,"position":2},"title":"Can a married daughter apply for compassionate appointment in State Government Jobs? Allahabad High Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad high Court said that there is no plausible reason why the proposal made by the Institutional Service Board for striking down the word \u2018unmarried\u2019 occurring in Regulation 104 of Regulations 1975 could be turned down by the State Government.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/hp-hc-whether-a-daughter-upon-marriage-ceases-to-be-a-part-of-the-family-for-the-purpose-of-seeking-compassionate-appointment-against-her-deceased-father-hc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":261411,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Whether a daughter upon marriage ceases to be a part of the family for the purpose of seeking compassionate appointment against her deceased father; HC elucidates","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Sureshwar Thakur and Chander Bhusan Barowalia JJ., while allowing the present petition said, \u201cMarriage neither alters the relationship between the married daughters with her parents nor creates severance of a relationship. A son remains a son and his marriage does not alter\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":316098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/dismissal-of-married-daughter-for-compassionate-appointment-is-arbitrary-orissa-hc-reiterates-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":261411,"position":4},"title":"Dismissal of married daughter\u2019s candidacy for compassionate appointment is arbitrary and violative of Constitution: Orissa HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The policy of the State Government which disqualifies a 'married' daughter and excludes her from consideration for compassionate appointment, apart from being arbitrary and discriminating, is a retrograde step.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/23\/allahabad-high-court-recruitment-of-dependents-of-government-servants-dying-in-harness-rules-1974-wife-entitled-to-compassionate-appointment-before-sister\/","url_meta":{"origin":261411,"position":5},"title":"Allahabad High Court| [Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974] Wife entitled to compassionate appointment before sister","author":"Editor","date":"August 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Neeraj Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition which was filed with prayer for directing the respondents to grant the representation for compassionate appointment of the petitioner holding that sister can't claim benefit of Compassionate Appointment in presence of wife under U.P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261411\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}